Evaluating the Impact of a Second-Level Observation Unit on Patient Outcomes at a Large Academic Health Center with a Coexisting Type I Observation Unit.
Padageshwar Sunkara, Gary E Rosenthal, Chi-Cheng Huang, Gregory B Russell, Tareq S Islam, William C Lippert
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of a Second-Level Observation Unit on Patient Outcomes at a Large Academic Health Center with a Coexisting Type I Observation Unit.","authors":"Padageshwar Sunkara, Gary E Rosenthal, Chi-Cheng Huang, Gregory B Russell, Tareq S Islam, William C Lippert","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observation units (OUs) are a common healthcare delivery model for health systems across the United States. OUs vary from a type I to type IV based on several factors. Another category of OUs-second-level OUs-does not fit this traditional classification due to a different patient population composition and staffing model. The impact of a second-level OU in the setting of a coexisting type I OU has not been previously evaluated. As such, our study assesses the impact of patient outcomes in a second-level OU with a coexisting type I OU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We established a second-level OU comprising 14 beds on a medical-surgical floor. Patients designated as observation status who did not meet the criteria for the type I OU in the emergency department were cohorted on this unit and cared for by a multidisciplinary team that included nurses, case managers, pharmacists, and hospital medicine providers. We compared patient outcomes pre- and postsecond-level OU implementation for all observation status patients admitted to hospital medicine between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients cohorted on the second-level OU had a shorter length of stay (estimated reduction in 11.7 hours; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) and a lower conversion rate from observation to inpatient status (\"admission rate\"; 14.5% vs 57.7%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) in comparison to the nonintervention group; this led to a saving of 506.5 bed-days in comparison to the preimplementation phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of a second-level OU in the setting of a coexisting type I OU led to a reduced length of stay, admission rate, and bed-days saved.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"118 6","pages":"324-329"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001836","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Observation units (OUs) are a common healthcare delivery model for health systems across the United States. OUs vary from a type I to type IV based on several factors. Another category of OUs-second-level OUs-does not fit this traditional classification due to a different patient population composition and staffing model. The impact of a second-level OU in the setting of a coexisting type I OU has not been previously evaluated. As such, our study assesses the impact of patient outcomes in a second-level OU with a coexisting type I OU.
Methods: We established a second-level OU comprising 14 beds on a medical-surgical floor. Patients designated as observation status who did not meet the criteria for the type I OU in the emergency department were cohorted on this unit and cared for by a multidisciplinary team that included nurses, case managers, pharmacists, and hospital medicine providers. We compared patient outcomes pre- and postsecond-level OU implementation for all observation status patients admitted to hospital medicine between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019.
Results: Patients cohorted on the second-level OU had a shorter length of stay (estimated reduction in 11.7 hours; P < 0.0001) and a lower conversion rate from observation to inpatient status ("admission rate"; 14.5% vs 57.7%; P < 0.0001) in comparison to the nonintervention group; this led to a saving of 506.5 bed-days in comparison to the preimplementation phase.
Conclusions: Implementation of a second-level OU in the setting of a coexisting type I OU led to a reduced length of stay, admission rate, and bed-days saved.
期刊介绍:
As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.