Patient safety incidences: Perspectives of South African audiologists.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Suvishka Barath, Ntandoyenkosi L Msomi, Andrew J Ross
{"title":"Patient safety incidences: Perspectives of South African audiologists.","authors":"Suvishka Barath, Ntandoyenkosi L Msomi, Andrew J Ross","doi":"10.4102/safp.v67i1.6134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Patient safety incidents (PSIs) in audiology have received limited attention compared to other health care professions in South Africa, despite their potential to significantly impact patient well-being. This study explores audiologists' experiences of PSIs and the factors contributing to their emergence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A qualitative, contextual, descriptive exploratory research design was employed. Individual semi-structured online interviews were conducted with eight audiologists working in South Africa. The data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Participants highlighted that PSIs in audiology are often underestimated, yet they can profoundly affect patients' quality of life. Inadequate university training on PSIs was identified as a key contributing factor. Technological advancements, such as over-the-counter hearing aids and automated assessments, were viewed as potential risks without proper professional oversight. Organisational support varied, with clearer protocols observed in the public sector than in private practice. In addition, staff shortages and high workloads increased the likelihood of PSIs by compromising patient care. To mitigate these risks, participants recommended enhanced training, stricter regulation of hearing technologies and improved patient education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This study underscores the need for greater recognition and proactive management of PSIs in audiology. Addressing training gaps, strengthening organisational support and implementing regulatory measures for emerging technologies are essential to improving patient safety outcomes.Contribution: This study expands the understanding of PSIs in audiology and offers insights that can inform curriculum reform and professional development initiatives in South Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":22040,"journal":{"name":"South African Family Practice","volume":"67 1","pages":"e1-e9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Family Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v67i1.6134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Patient safety incidents (PSIs) in audiology have received limited attention compared to other health care professions in South Africa, despite their potential to significantly impact patient well-being. This study explores audiologists' experiences of PSIs and the factors contributing to their emergence.

Methods:  A qualitative, contextual, descriptive exploratory research design was employed. Individual semi-structured online interviews were conducted with eight audiologists working in South Africa. The data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis.

Results:  Participants highlighted that PSIs in audiology are often underestimated, yet they can profoundly affect patients' quality of life. Inadequate university training on PSIs was identified as a key contributing factor. Technological advancements, such as over-the-counter hearing aids and automated assessments, were viewed as potential risks without proper professional oversight. Organisational support varied, with clearer protocols observed in the public sector than in private practice. In addition, staff shortages and high workloads increased the likelihood of PSIs by compromising patient care. To mitigate these risks, participants recommended enhanced training, stricter regulation of hearing technologies and improved patient education.

Conclusion:  This study underscores the need for greater recognition and proactive management of PSIs in audiology. Addressing training gaps, strengthening organisational support and implementing regulatory measures for emerging technologies are essential to improving patient safety outcomes.Contribution: This study expands the understanding of PSIs in audiology and offers insights that can inform curriculum reform and professional development initiatives in South Africa.

患者安全事件:南非听力学家的观点。
背景:与南非其他卫生保健专业相比,听力学领域的患者安全事件(psi)受到的关注有限,尽管它们有可能显著影响患者的健康。本研究探讨听力学家对前耳鸣的经验及导致其出现的因素。方法:采用定性、情境、描述性的探索性研究设计。我们对8位在南非工作的听力学家进行了半结构化的在线访谈。数据分析采用Braun和Clarke的反身性主题分析。结果:参与者强调听力学中的psi通常被低估,但它们可以深刻地影响患者的生活质量。确定大学在psi方面的培训不足是一个关键因素。技术进步,如非处方助听器和自动评估,被视为潜在的风险,没有适当的专业监督。组织支持各不相同,公共部门的协议比私营部门更明确。此外,人员短缺和高工作量会影响患者护理,从而增加psi的可能性。为了减轻这些风险,与会者建议加强培训,严格监管听力技术并改善患者教育。结论:本研究强调了对听力学中PSIs的更多认识和积极管理的必要性。解决培训差距、加强组织支持和实施新兴技术的监管措施对于改善患者安全结果至关重要。贡献:本研究扩展了对听力学中psi的理解,并为南非的课程改革和专业发展倡议提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South African Family Practice
South African Family Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: South African Family Practice (SAFP) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, which strives to provide primary care physicians and researchers with a broad range of scholarly work in the disciplines of Family Medicine, Primary Health Care, Rural Medicine, District Health and other related fields. SAFP publishes original research, clinical reviews, and pertinent commentary that advance the knowledge base of these disciplines. The content of SAFP is designed to reflect and support further development of the broad basis of these disciplines through original research and critical review of evidence in important clinical areas; as well as to provide practitioners with continuing professional development material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信