Victoria Furer, Omer Kersh, Mark Berman, Ayelet Grupper, Liane Rabinowich, Hagit Peleg, Elisheva Pokroy-Shapira, Ori Elkayam
{"title":"Safety of biologic therapy in kidney and liver transplant recipients with systemic inflammatory diseases: a real-world study from Israel.","authors":"Victoria Furer, Omer Kersh, Mark Berman, Ayelet Grupper, Liane Rabinowich, Hagit Peleg, Elisheva Pokroy-Shapira, Ori Elkayam","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keaf303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Safety is a concern for solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients with systemic inflammatory diseases (SIDs) treated with biologic therapy. This study evaluated the safety of biologic therapy in SOT recipients with SIDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study between 2000 and 2024 included 20 biologic-treated SOT recipients with SIDs matched to 56 SOT control recipients without SIDs, not treated with biologic therapy. The study compared post-transplant safety outcomes, with serious infections defined as the primary outcome. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis evaluated time-to-safety event outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The biologic-treated group included patients with SIDs, mainly with IBD and FMF treated with TNF and IL-1 inhibitors, respectively, 60% (n = 12) of whom were treated with biologics over 5 years post-SOT. There was a non-significant trend for serious infections in the biologic-treated group vs controls, 40% (n = 8) vs 23.21% (n = 13), P = 0.15, with urinary tract infections being the most prevalent in both groups. Recurrent serious infections were more prevalent in the biologic-treated group vs controls, 20% (n = 4) vs 12.5% (n = 2), P = 0.029. No opportunistic infections were observed. No graft rejection occurred in the biologic-treated group, compared with 5.37% in the control group. Cancer rates in the biologic-treated group were comparable with those in the control group, 15% vs 7.14%, P = 0.3. There were two deaths in the biologic-treated group (one attributed to COVID-19 infection and one from a car accident), compared with none in the control group, P = 0.003. There were six cases of biologic treatment discontinuation, mainly due to loss of efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This real-world cohort with 5-year follow-up since the post-SOT biologic initiation supported the feasibility of biologic therapy in SOT recipients with SIDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"5372-5378"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaf303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Safety is a concern for solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients with systemic inflammatory diseases (SIDs) treated with biologic therapy. This study evaluated the safety of biologic therapy in SOT recipients with SIDs.
Methods: This retrospective study between 2000 and 2024 included 20 biologic-treated SOT recipients with SIDs matched to 56 SOT control recipients without SIDs, not treated with biologic therapy. The study compared post-transplant safety outcomes, with serious infections defined as the primary outcome. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis evaluated time-to-safety event outcomes.
Results: The biologic-treated group included patients with SIDs, mainly with IBD and FMF treated with TNF and IL-1 inhibitors, respectively, 60% (n = 12) of whom were treated with biologics over 5 years post-SOT. There was a non-significant trend for serious infections in the biologic-treated group vs controls, 40% (n = 8) vs 23.21% (n = 13), P = 0.15, with urinary tract infections being the most prevalent in both groups. Recurrent serious infections were more prevalent in the biologic-treated group vs controls, 20% (n = 4) vs 12.5% (n = 2), P = 0.029. No opportunistic infections were observed. No graft rejection occurred in the biologic-treated group, compared with 5.37% in the control group. Cancer rates in the biologic-treated group were comparable with those in the control group, 15% vs 7.14%, P = 0.3. There were two deaths in the biologic-treated group (one attributed to COVID-19 infection and one from a car accident), compared with none in the control group, P = 0.003. There were six cases of biologic treatment discontinuation, mainly due to loss of efficacy.
Conclusion: This real-world cohort with 5-year follow-up since the post-SOT biologic initiation supported the feasibility of biologic therapy in SOT recipients with SIDs.
期刊介绍:
Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press.
Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.