Safety of biologic therapy in kidney and liver transplant recipients with systemic inflammatory diseases: a real-world study from Israel.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Victoria Furer, Omer Kersh, Mark Berman, Ayelet Grupper, Liane Rabinowich, Hagit Peleg, Elisheva Pokroy-Shapira, Ori Elkayam
{"title":"Safety of biologic therapy in kidney and liver transplant recipients with systemic inflammatory diseases: a real-world study from Israel.","authors":"Victoria Furer, Omer Kersh, Mark Berman, Ayelet Grupper, Liane Rabinowich, Hagit Peleg, Elisheva Pokroy-Shapira, Ori Elkayam","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keaf303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Safety is a concern for solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients with systemic inflammatory diseases (SID) treated with biologic therapy. This study evaluated the safety of biologic therapy in SOT recipients with SID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study between 2000-2024 included 20 biologic-treated SOT recipients with SID matched to 56 SOT recipients controls without SID not treated with biologic therapy. The study compared post-transplant safety outcomes, with serious infections defined as the primary outcome. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis evaluated time-to-safety event outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The biologic-treated group included patients with mainly inflammatory bowel disease and Familial Mediterranean Fever treated with TNF and IL-1 inhibitors, respectively, with 60% (n = 12) treated with biologics over 5 years post-SOT. There was a non-significant trend for serious infections in the biologic-treated group vs controls, 40% (n = 8) vs 23.21% (n = 13), p= 0.15, with urinary tract infection being the most prevalent in both groups. Recurrent serious infections were more prevalent in the biologic-treated group vs controls, 20% (n = 4) vs 12.5% (n = 2), p= 0.029. No opportunistic infections were observed. No graft rejection occurred in the biologic-treated group compared with 5.37% in controls. Cancer rates were comparable in the biologic-treated group vs controls, 15% vs 7.14%, p= 0.3. There were 2 deaths attributed to COVID-19 infection and a car accident compared with none in the control group, p= 0.003. There were 6 cases of biologic treatment discontinuation, mainly due to loss of efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This real-world cohort based on 5-year follow-up since the post-SOT biologic initiation supports the feasibility of biologic therapy in SOT recipients with SID.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaf303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Safety is a concern for solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients with systemic inflammatory diseases (SID) treated with biologic therapy. This study evaluated the safety of biologic therapy in SOT recipients with SID.

Methods: This retrospective study between 2000-2024 included 20 biologic-treated SOT recipients with SID matched to 56 SOT recipients controls without SID not treated with biologic therapy. The study compared post-transplant safety outcomes, with serious infections defined as the primary outcome. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis evaluated time-to-safety event outcomes.

Results: The biologic-treated group included patients with mainly inflammatory bowel disease and Familial Mediterranean Fever treated with TNF and IL-1 inhibitors, respectively, with 60% (n = 12) treated with biologics over 5 years post-SOT. There was a non-significant trend for serious infections in the biologic-treated group vs controls, 40% (n = 8) vs 23.21% (n = 13), p= 0.15, with urinary tract infection being the most prevalent in both groups. Recurrent serious infections were more prevalent in the biologic-treated group vs controls, 20% (n = 4) vs 12.5% (n = 2), p= 0.029. No opportunistic infections were observed. No graft rejection occurred in the biologic-treated group compared with 5.37% in controls. Cancer rates were comparable in the biologic-treated group vs controls, 15% vs 7.14%, p= 0.3. There were 2 deaths attributed to COVID-19 infection and a car accident compared with none in the control group, p= 0.003. There were 6 cases of biologic treatment discontinuation, mainly due to loss of efficacy.

Conclusion: This real-world cohort based on 5-year follow-up since the post-SOT biologic initiation supports the feasibility of biologic therapy in SOT recipients with SID.

肾和肝移植受者系统性炎症性疾病生物治疗的安全性:一项来自以色列的真实世界研究
目的:对于接受生物疗法治疗系统性炎症性疾病(SID)的实体器官移植(SOT)受者来说,安全性是一个值得关注的问题。本研究评估了SOT受体伴SID的生物治疗的安全性。方法:这项2000-2024年间的回顾性研究纳入了20例经生物治疗的SID的SOT受者,与56例未经生物治疗的非SID的SOT受者相匹配。该研究比较了移植后的安全结果,并将严重感染定义为主要结果。Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估了事件的安全时间。结果:生物制剂治疗组主要包括分别接受TNF和IL-1抑制剂治疗的炎症性肠病和家族性地中海热患者,其中60% (n = 12)在sot后5年内接受生物制剂治疗。生物制剂治疗组与对照组相比,严重感染的趋势不显著,分别为40% (n = 8)和23.21% (n = 13), p= 0.15,两组中尿路感染最为普遍。与对照组相比,生物治疗组复发性严重感染更为普遍,20% (n = 4) vs 12.5% (n = 2), p= 0.029。未见机会性感染。生物治疗组未发生排斥反应,对照组为5.37%。生物治疗组与对照组的癌症发病率相当,15% vs 7.14%, p= 0.3。2例死亡归因于COVID-19感染和1例车祸,对照组无死亡,p= 0.003。生物治疗终止6例,主要原因是失去疗效。结论:这一真实世界的队列研究基于自SOT后生物启动的5年随访,支持了SOT受者SID生物治疗的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology
Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1091
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press. Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信