Primary Prophylaxis for High-Risk Varices in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus Delayed Hepatic Decompensation: A Retrospective, Propensity Score Matching Study.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2025-05-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHC.S520318
Yu-Jen Chen, Ming-Chih Hou, Tsung-Chieh Yang, Pei-Chang Lee, Hsiao-Sheng Lu, Hui-Chun Huang, Yi-Hsiang Huang, Jiing-Chyuan Luo
{"title":"Primary Prophylaxis for High-Risk Varices in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus Delayed Hepatic Decompensation: A Retrospective, Propensity Score Matching Study.","authors":"Yu-Jen Chen, Ming-Chih Hou, Tsung-Chieh Yang, Pei-Chang Lee, Hsiao-Sheng Lu, Hui-Chun Huang, Yi-Hsiang Huang, Jiing-Chyuan Luo","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S520318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The prevalence of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is high in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). There was no evidence of whether primary prophylaxis is beneficial in reducing hepatic decompensation in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical records of 445 patients with pathology or radiology-confirmed HCC and PVTT from January 2013 to December 2022 were reviewed, 142 patients having concurrent high-risk varices (HRV) without hepatic decompensation were enrolled. Patients were divided into the prophylaxis group and non-prophylaxis group. Propensity score matching was used for group comparison. The primary endpoint was decompensation-free survival (DFS), and the secondary endpoints were the incidence of esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of EVB was higher in the non-prophylaxis group than in the prophylaxis group (46.8% VS 21%, p = 0.001). DFS was longer in the prophylaxis group than in the non-prophylaxis group (84 days vs 66 days, p = 0.009). There was no difference in OS between two groups. In multivariate analysis, primary prophylaxis was associated with longer DFS (HR 0.806, p = 0.017); Immunotherapy (IO) was associated with longer DFS and OS; Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage D was associated with shorter DFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary prophylaxis delays hepatic decompensation in HCC patients with PVTT. The incidence of EVB was also lower in the prophylaxis group, particularly in those treated with NSBB. First-line IO treatment is independently associated with better DFS and OS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"12 ","pages":"1057-1067"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12127523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S520318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The prevalence of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is high in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). There was no evidence of whether primary prophylaxis is beneficial in reducing hepatic decompensation in these patients.

Methods: Clinical records of 445 patients with pathology or radiology-confirmed HCC and PVTT from January 2013 to December 2022 were reviewed, 142 patients having concurrent high-risk varices (HRV) without hepatic decompensation were enrolled. Patients were divided into the prophylaxis group and non-prophylaxis group. Propensity score matching was used for group comparison. The primary endpoint was decompensation-free survival (DFS), and the secondary endpoints were the incidence of esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) and overall survival (OS).

Results: The incidence of EVB was higher in the non-prophylaxis group than in the prophylaxis group (46.8% VS 21%, p = 0.001). DFS was longer in the prophylaxis group than in the non-prophylaxis group (84 days vs 66 days, p = 0.009). There was no difference in OS between two groups. In multivariate analysis, primary prophylaxis was associated with longer DFS (HR 0.806, p = 0.017); Immunotherapy (IO) was associated with longer DFS and OS; Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage D was associated with shorter DFS and OS.

Conclusion: Primary prophylaxis delays hepatic decompensation in HCC patients with PVTT. The incidence of EVB was also lower in the prophylaxis group, particularly in those treated with NSBB. First-line IO treatment is independently associated with better DFS and OS.

肝细胞癌和门静脉肿瘤血栓迟发性肝失代偿患者高危静脉曲张的初级预防:回顾性倾向评分匹配研究
背景与目的:肝细胞癌(HCC)和门静脉肿瘤血栓(PVTT)患者临床显著性门静脉高压症(CSPH)患病率高。没有证据表明初级预防是否有利于减少这些患者的肝功能失代偿。方法:回顾2013年1月至2022年12月445例病理或影像学证实的HCC和PVTT患者的临床资料,其中142例合并高危静脉曲张(HRV),无肝代偿。患者分为预防组和非预防组。采用倾向评分匹配进行组间比较。主要终点为无失代偿生存期(DFS),次要终点为食管静脉曲张出血(EVB)发生率和总生存期(OS)。结果:非预防组EVB发病率高于预防组(46.8% VS 21%, p = 0.001)。预防组的DFS比非预防组长(84天vs 66天,p = 0.009)。两组间OS无差异。在多变量分析中,初级预防与较长的DFS相关(HR 0.806, p = 0.017);免疫治疗(IO)与更长的DFS和OS相关;巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC) D期与较短的DFS和OS相关。结论:初级预防可延缓肝细胞癌合并PVTT患者肝功能失代偿。预防组EVB的发病率也较低,特别是在接受NSBB治疗的组中。一线IO治疗与更好的DFS和OS独立相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信