Validation of (self-collected) capillary blood using a topper collection system as alternative for venous sampling for 15 common clinical chemistry analytes.
Rümeysa Geujar, Dilana Treffers, Maaike Roelofs, Anna van Dongen, Kalpana Ramkisoensing, Rixt Even, Huub H van Rossum
{"title":"Validation of (self-collected) capillary blood using a topper collection system as alternative for venous sampling for 15 common clinical chemistry analytes.","authors":"Rümeysa Geujar, Dilana Treffers, Maaike Roelofs, Anna van Dongen, Kalpana Ramkisoensing, Rixt Even, Huub H van Rossum","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2025-0148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Home blood sampling for clinical purposes has gained much interest. This study validates the recently developed Topper-based capillary blood collection procedure for 15 commonly used chemistry analytes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 study participants (21 healthy volunteers and 99 patients) were enrolled. A venous sample was obtained and then participants were asked to self-collect blood by the Topper system (SelfSafeSure Blood Collection Devices). Collected sera were analyzed for 15 common clinical chemistry analytes and the serum indices on a Cobas Pro (Roche) system. Spearman correlations, Passing-Bablok regression analysis, and Bland-Altman difference analysis were performed. Comparability was determined using allowable bias criteria based on biological variation (EFLM database).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 113 out of 120 (94 %) self-collections a sample was obtained that allowed for the analysis of at least one analyte. Bland-Altman difference analysis showed that glucose and uncorrected AST did not meet the minimum bias criterion, creatinine and albumin were within the minimum bias criterion and urea and calcium were within the desirable bias criterion. ALP, corrected AST, ALT, total- HDL- and LDL-cholesterol, CRP, GGT, total protein and triglycerides were all within the optimal bias criterion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates that self-collected capillary blood can be used as a reliable alternative to venous sampling for most, if not all, analytes studied. Based on the analyte stability prior to sample processing, home sampling appears to be a reliable sampling option for a selection of these analytes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0148","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Home blood sampling for clinical purposes has gained much interest. This study validates the recently developed Topper-based capillary blood collection procedure for 15 commonly used chemistry analytes.
Methods: A total of 120 study participants (21 healthy volunteers and 99 patients) were enrolled. A venous sample was obtained and then participants were asked to self-collect blood by the Topper system (SelfSafeSure Blood Collection Devices). Collected sera were analyzed for 15 common clinical chemistry analytes and the serum indices on a Cobas Pro (Roche) system. Spearman correlations, Passing-Bablok regression analysis, and Bland-Altman difference analysis were performed. Comparability was determined using allowable bias criteria based on biological variation (EFLM database).
Results: In 113 out of 120 (94 %) self-collections a sample was obtained that allowed for the analysis of at least one analyte. Bland-Altman difference analysis showed that glucose and uncorrected AST did not meet the minimum bias criterion, creatinine and albumin were within the minimum bias criterion and urea and calcium were within the desirable bias criterion. ALP, corrected AST, ALT, total- HDL- and LDL-cholesterol, CRP, GGT, total protein and triglycerides were all within the optimal bias criterion.
Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that self-collected capillary blood can be used as a reliable alternative to venous sampling for most, if not all, analytes studied. Based on the analyte stability prior to sample processing, home sampling appears to be a reliable sampling option for a selection of these analytes.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically.
CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France).
Topics:
- clinical biochemistry
- clinical genomics and molecular biology
- clinical haematology and coagulation
- clinical immunology and autoimmunity
- clinical microbiology
- drug monitoring and analysis
- evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers
- disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes)
- new reagents, instrumentation and technologies
- new methodologies
- reference materials and methods
- reference values and decision limits
- quality and safety in laboratory medicine
- translational laboratory medicine
- clinical metrology
Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!