National trends in neoadjuvant systemic therapy utilization in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer from 2016-2021: The impact of the KATHERINE trial.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Lauren N Cohen, Christine C Rogers, Jan Irene C Lloren, Sailaja Kamaraju, Lubna N Chaudhary, Chiang-Ching Huang, Adrienne N Cobb, Puneet Singh, Amanda L Kong, Mediget Teshome, Chandler S Cortina
{"title":"National trends in neoadjuvant systemic therapy utilization in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer from 2016-2021: The impact of the KATHERINE trial.","authors":"Lauren N Cohen, Christine C Rogers, Jan Irene C Lloren, Sailaja Kamaraju, Lubna N Chaudhary, Chiang-Ching Huang, Adrienne N Cobb, Puneet Singh, Amanda L Kong, Mediget Teshome, Chandler S Cortina","doi":"10.1007/s10549-025-07750-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) for HER2 + breast cancer (HER2 + BC) has historically been used to downstage disease to facilitate surgical de-escalation; however, in 2019, the KATHERINE trial identified a survival benefit to adjuvant T-DM1 for those with residual disease after NST. We aimed to determine national rates of NST for patients with cT1-2 N0 M0 HER2 + BC and identify factors associated with receipt of NST vs upfront surgery with adjuvant systemic therapy (US-AST).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of women with cT1-2 N0 M0 HER2 + BC was performed using the National Cancer Database from 2016-2021. ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, Fisher's Exact tests, and a multivariable logistic regression analysis were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>54,449 patients met inclusion: 30,546 (56.1%) received US-AST and 19,562 (35.9%) received NST. NST utilization increased from 31.1% in 2016-17 to 43.3% in 2020-21. On regression analysis, women diagnosed in 2020-21 were more likely to receive NST (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.8-2.0). Populations less likely to receive NST included NH-Black women (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.8-0.95), age ≥ 70 (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.8), increasing comorbidities (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9), and Medicare insurance (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.8). Patients with cT2 disease were more likely to receive NST vs those with cT1 disease (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From 2016-2021, national rates of NST for patients with cT1-2 N0 HER2 + BC significantly increased. Race/ethnicity and insurance type were associated with receipt of NST underscoring ongoing disparities in care. Future studies are needed to determine the impact of the disparate rates of NST utilization on oncologic outcomes, given the survival benefit with adjuvant T-DM1 in those with residual disease after NST.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07750-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) for HER2 + breast cancer (HER2 + BC) has historically been used to downstage disease to facilitate surgical de-escalation; however, in 2019, the KATHERINE trial identified a survival benefit to adjuvant T-DM1 for those with residual disease after NST. We aimed to determine national rates of NST for patients with cT1-2 N0 M0 HER2 + BC and identify factors associated with receipt of NST vs upfront surgery with adjuvant systemic therapy (US-AST).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of women with cT1-2 N0 M0 HER2 + BC was performed using the National Cancer Database from 2016-2021. ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, Fisher's Exact tests, and a multivariable logistic regression analysis were used.

Results: 54,449 patients met inclusion: 30,546 (56.1%) received US-AST and 19,562 (35.9%) received NST. NST utilization increased from 31.1% in 2016-17 to 43.3% in 2020-21. On regression analysis, women diagnosed in 2020-21 were more likely to receive NST (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.8-2.0). Populations less likely to receive NST included NH-Black women (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.8-0.95), age ≥ 70 (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.8), increasing comorbidities (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9), and Medicare insurance (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.8). Patients with cT2 disease were more likely to receive NST vs those with cT1 disease (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: From 2016-2021, national rates of NST for patients with cT1-2 N0 HER2 + BC significantly increased. Race/ethnicity and insurance type were associated with receipt of NST underscoring ongoing disparities in care. Future studies are needed to determine the impact of the disparate rates of NST utilization on oncologic outcomes, given the survival benefit with adjuvant T-DM1 in those with residual disease after NST.

2016-2021年早期her2阳性乳腺癌患者新辅助全身治疗使用的全国趋势:KATHERINE试验的影响
目的:HER2 +乳腺癌(HER2 + BC)的新辅助全身治疗(NST)历来被用于降低疾病的分期,以促进手术降级;然而,在2019年,KATHERINE试验确定了辅助T-DM1对NST后残留疾病患者的生存益处。我们的目的是确定cT1-2 N0 M0 HER2 + BC患者的全国NST率,并确定与接受NST与术前辅助全身治疗(US-AST)相关的因素。方法:使用2016-2021年国家癌症数据库对cT1-2 N0 M0 HER2 + BC女性进行回顾性队列研究。采用方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis检验、卡方检验、Fisher’s Exact检验和多变量logistic回归分析。结果:54,449例患者符合纳入标准:30,546例(56.1%)接受US-AST治疗,19,562例(35.9%)接受NST治疗。NST利用率从2016-17年的31.1%增加到2020-21年的43.3%。在回归分析中,2020-21年确诊的女性更有可能接受NST (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.8-2.0)。较不可能接受NST的人群包括nh -黑人女性(OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.8-0.95)、年龄≥70岁(OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.8)、合并症增加(OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9)和医疗保险(OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.8)。与cT1患者相比,cT2患者更有可能接受NST治疗(p结论:从2016-2021年,全国cT1-2 N0 HER2 + BC患者的NST发生率显著增加。种族/民族和保险类型与接受NST有关,强调了护理中的持续差异。未来的研究需要确定不同的NST使用率对肿瘤预后的影响,考虑到辅助T-DM1对NST后残留疾病患者的生存益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信