Effect of transverse versus midline periumbilical incision on incisional hernia and short-term outcomes after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery: multicentre, open-label, randomized clinical trial.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
BJS Open Pub Date : 2025-05-07 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zraf062
Soo Young Lee, Soo Yeun Park, Gi Won Ha, Gyung Mo Son, Dong Keon Yon, Chang Hyun Kim
{"title":"Effect of transverse versus midline periumbilical incision on incisional hernia and short-term outcomes after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery: multicentre, open-label, randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Soo Young Lee, Soo Yeun Park, Gi Won Ha, Gyung Mo Son, Dong Keon Yon, Chang Hyun Kim","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to assess the effect of a periumbilical transverse incision compared with a periumbilical midline incision in reducing incisional hernia and improving short-term outcomes after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre, open-label, randomized clinical trial was conducted at four high-volume hospitals in Korea, between April 2021 and February 2023. Patients were eligible if they were aged ≥ 20 years and had pathologically confirmed colon cancer. Block randomization was undertaken in a 1 : 1 ratio to transverse versus midline groups, stratified by tumour location. The primary endpoint was the incidence of radiological incisional hernia at 12 months after surgery. The secondary endpoints included symptomatic incisional hernia and short-term outcomes such as outcomes during surgery, complications at 30 days after surgery, pain after surgery, hospital stay after surgery, and patient-reported questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 174 enrolled patients, 155 were analysed for primary outcome (79 in transverse group and 76 in midline group). Radiological incisional hernia was significantly less frequent in the transverse group (6%) compared with the midline group (18%) 12 months after surgery (P = 0.022); however, there was no significant difference in the incidence of symptomatic incisional hernia between the two groups (3 versus 8%; P = 0.162). Surgical outcomes, complications after surgery, pain, and length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the two groups. The transverse group had a shorter incision length (mean(standard deviation) 5.0(0.8) versus 5.3(0.8) cm; P = 0.027) and higher cosmesis score (18.0(3.2) versus 16.6(2.7); P = 0.006) than the midline group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A periumbilical transverse incision significantly reduced radiological incisional hernia compared with a midline incision in laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. Clinical Research Information Service registration number: KCT0006082 (https://cris.nih.go.kr).</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12131159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraf062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the effect of a periumbilical transverse incision compared with a periumbilical midline incision in reducing incisional hernia and improving short-term outcomes after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery.

Methods: This multicentre, open-label, randomized clinical trial was conducted at four high-volume hospitals in Korea, between April 2021 and February 2023. Patients were eligible if they were aged ≥ 20 years and had pathologically confirmed colon cancer. Block randomization was undertaken in a 1 : 1 ratio to transverse versus midline groups, stratified by tumour location. The primary endpoint was the incidence of radiological incisional hernia at 12 months after surgery. The secondary endpoints included symptomatic incisional hernia and short-term outcomes such as outcomes during surgery, complications at 30 days after surgery, pain after surgery, hospital stay after surgery, and patient-reported questionnaires.

Results: Of 174 enrolled patients, 155 were analysed for primary outcome (79 in transverse group and 76 in midline group). Radiological incisional hernia was significantly less frequent in the transverse group (6%) compared with the midline group (18%) 12 months after surgery (P = 0.022); however, there was no significant difference in the incidence of symptomatic incisional hernia between the two groups (3 versus 8%; P = 0.162). Surgical outcomes, complications after surgery, pain, and length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the two groups. The transverse group had a shorter incision length (mean(standard deviation) 5.0(0.8) versus 5.3(0.8) cm; P = 0.027) and higher cosmesis score (18.0(3.2) versus 16.6(2.7); P = 0.006) than the midline group.

Conclusion: A periumbilical transverse incision significantly reduced radiological incisional hernia compared with a midline incision in laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. Clinical Research Information Service registration number: KCT0006082 (https://cris.nih.go.kr).

脐周横切线与中线切口对腹腔镜结肠癌手术后切口疝和短期预后的影响:多中心、开放标签、随机临床试验
背景:本研究旨在评估脐周横向切口与脐周中线切口在腹腔镜结肠癌手术后减少切口疝和改善短期预后方面的效果。方法:这项多中心、开放标签、随机临床试验于2021年4月至2023年2月在韩国四家大医院进行。年龄≥20岁且病理证实为结肠癌的患者入选。横线组和中线组按1:1的比例进行分组随机化,按肿瘤位置分层。主要终点是术后12个月放射切口疝的发生率。次要终点包括有症状的切口疝和短期结果,如手术期间的结果、手术后30天的并发症、手术后疼痛、手术后住院时间和患者报告的问卷。结果:174例入组患者中,155例进行了主要结局分析(横行组79例,中行组76例)。术后12个月,横切线组放射切口疝发生率(6%)明显低于中线组(18%)(P = 0.022);然而,两组在有症状的切口疝发生率上无显著差异(3% vs 8%;P = 0.162)。手术结果、术后并发症、疼痛和住院时间在两组之间没有显著差异。横切组切口长度较短(平均(标准差)5.0(0.8)比5.3(0.8)cm;P = 0.027)和更高的美容评分(18.0(3.2)比16.6(2.7);P = 0.006)高于中线组。结论:在腹腔镜结肠癌手术中,脐周横切口较中线切口能显著减少放射学切口疝。临床研究信息服务注册号:KCT0006082 (https://cris.nih.go.kr)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信