Utility of Activity Measure for Postacute Care Scoring in Predicting Symptomatic Deep Venous Thromboembolism in Free Tissue Transfer.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Nikitha Potturi, Kelsey Gray, Stephanie H Carpentier, Stephanie Hamlin, James T Thompson
{"title":"Utility of Activity Measure for Postacute Care Scoring in Predicting Symptomatic Deep Venous Thromboembolism in Free Tissue Transfer.","authors":"Nikitha Potturi, Kelsey Gray, Stephanie H Carpentier, Stephanie Hamlin, James T Thompson","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Free tissue transfer (FTT) can be associated with limited postoperative mobility, increasing the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Currently, no standardized protocol for anticoagulation in FTT exists. VTE risk has been calculated using the Caprini score, which is based on preoperative assessments and lacks real-time data on postoperative mobility. The Activity Measure for Postacute Care (AM-PAC) score assesses patients' activity limitations and rehabilitation needs postoperatively. We hypothesize that AM-PAC score will correlate with postoperative VTE in FTT patients and may be a useful adjunct to the Caprini score in anticoagulation decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review was completed of patients undergoing FTT for breast or lower extremity reconstruction at a single institution from 2012 to 2023. Data were collected on patient demographics, donor and recipient site, AM-PAC score, Caprini score, postoperative VTE, and medical comorbidities. A composite score was calculated using equally weighted AM-PAC and Caprini scores. Data were analyzed using Wilcox rank-sum tests with a significance level of 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 78 patients who underwent breast or lower extremity FTT with an inpatient AM-PAC score evaluation. Six patients developed VTE postoperatively. There was no significant association between VTE and Caprini or AM-PAC scores, but patients with VTE had significantly higher composite scores (P = 0.033), with a higher odds ratio than Caprini or AM-PAC scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with VTE had significantly higher composite scores than patients without VTE. This may support utilizing AM-PAC score as an adjunct to Caprini score to guide postoperative anticoagulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 6S Suppl 4","pages":"S531-S533"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Free tissue transfer (FTT) can be associated with limited postoperative mobility, increasing the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Currently, no standardized protocol for anticoagulation in FTT exists. VTE risk has been calculated using the Caprini score, which is based on preoperative assessments and lacks real-time data on postoperative mobility. The Activity Measure for Postacute Care (AM-PAC) score assesses patients' activity limitations and rehabilitation needs postoperatively. We hypothesize that AM-PAC score will correlate with postoperative VTE in FTT patients and may be a useful adjunct to the Caprini score in anticoagulation decision-making.

Methods: A review was completed of patients undergoing FTT for breast or lower extremity reconstruction at a single institution from 2012 to 2023. Data were collected on patient demographics, donor and recipient site, AM-PAC score, Caprini score, postoperative VTE, and medical comorbidities. A composite score was calculated using equally weighted AM-PAC and Caprini scores. Data were analyzed using Wilcox rank-sum tests with a significance level of 0.05.

Results: There were 78 patients who underwent breast or lower extremity FTT with an inpatient AM-PAC score evaluation. Six patients developed VTE postoperatively. There was no significant association between VTE and Caprini or AM-PAC scores, but patients with VTE had significantly higher composite scores (P = 0.033), with a higher odds ratio than Caprini or AM-PAC scores.

Conclusions: Patients with VTE had significantly higher composite scores than patients without VTE. This may support utilizing AM-PAC score as an adjunct to Caprini score to guide postoperative anticoagulation.

活动测量在急性后护理评分中预测游离组织移植中症状性深静脉血栓栓塞的效用。
背景:游离组织移植(FTT)可能与术后活动受限相关,增加静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的风险。目前,FTT的抗凝治疗还没有标准化的方案。静脉血栓栓塞风险的计算使用capriti评分,该评分基于术前评估,缺乏术后活动能力的实时数据。急性后护理活动测量(AM-PAC)评分评估患者的活动限制和术后康复需求。我们假设AM-PAC评分与FTT患者术后静脉血栓栓塞相关,并可能在抗凝决策中作为Caprini评分的有用辅助。方法:回顾性分析2012年至2023年在同一医院接受FTT乳房或下肢重建的患者。收集患者人口统计数据、供体和受体部位、AM-PAC评分、capriini评分、术后静脉血栓栓塞和医疗合并症。使用相同权重的AM-PAC和capriti分数计算复合分数。数据分析采用Wilcox秩和检验,显著性水平为0.05。结果:78例患者接受了乳房或下肢FTT并进行了住院AM-PAC评分评估。6例患者术后发生静脉血栓栓塞。VTE与capriti、AM-PAC评分无显著相关性,但VTE患者的综合评分显著高于capriti、AM-PAC评分(P = 0.033),优势比高于capriti、AM-PAC评分。结论:静脉血栓栓塞患者的综合评分明显高于无静脉血栓栓塞患者。这可能支持AM-PAC评分作为capriti评分的辅助来指导术后抗凝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信