Maura Marcucci, Matthew T V Chan, Thomas W Painter, Sergey Efremov, Hector J Aguado, Sergey V Astrakov, Ydo V Kleinlugtenbelt, Ameen Patel, Juan P Cata, Mohammed Amir, Mikhail Kirov, Kate Leslie, Emmanuelle Duceppe, Flavia K Borges, Miriam de Nadal, Vikas Tandon, Giovanni Landoni, Valery V Likhvantsev, Vladimir Lomivorotov, Daniel I Sessler, María José Martínez-Zapata, Denis Xavier, Edith Fleischmann, Chew Yin Wang, Christian S Meyhoff, Maria Wittmann, David Torres, David Highton, Michael Jacka, Vishwanath B, Kelly Zarnke, Ravinder Singh Sidhu, Giorgio Oriani, Sabry Ayad, Steven Minear, Tristan E Weaver, Kurt Ruetzler, Claudia Brusasco, Joel L Parlow, Elizabeth Maxwell, Scott Miller, Marko Mrkobrada, Keyur Suresh Chandra Bhatt, Prashant Rahate, Ana Kowark, Giuseppe De Blasio, Sandra N Ofori, David Conen, Sadeesh Srinathan, Wojciech Szczeklik, Raja Jayaram, Richard K Ellerkmann, Mona Momeni, Ingrid Copland, Jessica Vincent, Kumar Balasubramanian, Zhuoru Li, Michael Ke Wang, Deyang Li, Michael H McGillion, Andrea Kurz, Mukul Sharma, Timothy G Short, P J Devereaux
{"title":"Effects of a Hypotension-Avoidance Versus a Hypertension-Avoidance Strategy on Neurocognitive Outcomes After Noncardiac Surgery.","authors":"Maura Marcucci, Matthew T V Chan, Thomas W Painter, Sergey Efremov, Hector J Aguado, Sergey V Astrakov, Ydo V Kleinlugtenbelt, Ameen Patel, Juan P Cata, Mohammed Amir, Mikhail Kirov, Kate Leslie, Emmanuelle Duceppe, Flavia K Borges, Miriam de Nadal, Vikas Tandon, Giovanni Landoni, Valery V Likhvantsev, Vladimir Lomivorotov, Daniel I Sessler, María José Martínez-Zapata, Denis Xavier, Edith Fleischmann, Chew Yin Wang, Christian S Meyhoff, Maria Wittmann, David Torres, David Highton, Michael Jacka, Vishwanath B, Kelly Zarnke, Ravinder Singh Sidhu, Giorgio Oriani, Sabry Ayad, Steven Minear, Tristan E Weaver, Kurt Ruetzler, Claudia Brusasco, Joel L Parlow, Elizabeth Maxwell, Scott Miller, Marko Mrkobrada, Keyur Suresh Chandra Bhatt, Prashant Rahate, Ana Kowark, Giuseppe De Blasio, Sandra N Ofori, David Conen, Sadeesh Srinathan, Wojciech Szczeklik, Raja Jayaram, Richard K Ellerkmann, Mona Momeni, Ingrid Copland, Jessica Vincent, Kumar Balasubramanian, Zhuoru Li, Michael Ke Wang, Deyang Li, Michael H McGillion, Andrea Kurz, Mukul Sharma, Timothy G Short, P J Devereaux","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-02841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative hemodynamic abnormalities have been associated with neurocognitive outcomes after noncardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of perioperative hypotension-avoidance versus hypertension-avoidance strategies on delirium and 1-year cognitive decline after noncardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03505723).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>54 centers, 19 countries.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>2603 high-vascular-risk patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, receiving 1 or more chronic antihypertensive medications (mean age, 70 years).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>In the hypotension-avoidance strategy, the intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) target was 80 mm Hg or greater; before and for 2 days after surgery, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors were withheld, and other chronic antihypertensive medications were administered for systolic blood pressures of 130 mm Hg or greater following an algorithm. In the hypertension-avoidance strategy, the intraoperative MAP target was 60 mm Hg or greater; all chronic antihypertensive medications were continued perioperatively.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Delirium on postoperative day 1 to 3 (primary outcome); decline of 2 points or more at the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) 1 year after surgery compared with baseline (secondary outcome).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>95 of 1310 patients (7.3%) in the hypotension-avoidance and 90 of 1293 patients (7.0%) in the hypertension-avoidance group had delirium (relative risk [RR], 1.04 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.38]). Among 701 patients who completed 1-year MoCA (full or telephone version), 129 of 347 (37.2%) in the hypotension-avoidance and 117 of 354 (33.1%) in the hypertension-avoidance group had a decline of 2 or more points (RR, 1.13 [CI, 0.92 to 1.38]). Nineteen percent in the hypotension-avoidance and 27% in the hypertension-avoidance strategy had hypotension requiring an intervention (RR, 0.63 [CI, 0.52 to 0.76]), mostly intraoperatively; only 5%, in both groups, had hypotension postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic challenged site participation in the substudy; although large, the sample size was lower than expected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no evidence of a difference in neurocognitive outcomes between the hypotension-avoidance and hypertension-avoidance strategies.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada; National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia; Research Grant Council, Hong Kong SAR, China.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"909-920"},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-02841","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Perioperative hemodynamic abnormalities have been associated with neurocognitive outcomes after noncardiac surgery.
Objective: To compare the effects of perioperative hypotension-avoidance versus hypertension-avoidance strategies on delirium and 1-year cognitive decline after noncardiac surgery.
Participants: 2603 high-vascular-risk patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, receiving 1 or more chronic antihypertensive medications (mean age, 70 years).
Intervention: In the hypotension-avoidance strategy, the intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) target was 80 mm Hg or greater; before and for 2 days after surgery, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors were withheld, and other chronic antihypertensive medications were administered for systolic blood pressures of 130 mm Hg or greater following an algorithm. In the hypertension-avoidance strategy, the intraoperative MAP target was 60 mm Hg or greater; all chronic antihypertensive medications were continued perioperatively.
Measurements: Delirium on postoperative day 1 to 3 (primary outcome); decline of 2 points or more at the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) 1 year after surgery compared with baseline (secondary outcome).
Results: 95 of 1310 patients (7.3%) in the hypotension-avoidance and 90 of 1293 patients (7.0%) in the hypertension-avoidance group had delirium (relative risk [RR], 1.04 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.38]). Among 701 patients who completed 1-year MoCA (full or telephone version), 129 of 347 (37.2%) in the hypotension-avoidance and 117 of 354 (33.1%) in the hypertension-avoidance group had a decline of 2 or more points (RR, 1.13 [CI, 0.92 to 1.38]). Nineteen percent in the hypotension-avoidance and 27% in the hypertension-avoidance strategy had hypotension requiring an intervention (RR, 0.63 [CI, 0.52 to 0.76]), mostly intraoperatively; only 5%, in both groups, had hypotension postoperatively.
Limitation: The COVID-19 pandemic challenged site participation in the substudy; although large, the sample size was lower than expected.
Conclusion: There was no evidence of a difference in neurocognitive outcomes between the hypotension-avoidance and hypertension-avoidance strategies.
Primary funding source: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada; National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia; Research Grant Council, Hong Kong SAR, China.
期刊介绍:
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.