{"title":"Investigation of the effectiveness of whitening toothpastes following bleaching treatments.","authors":"Tutku Baytok Kavci, Hande Kemaloğlu, Murat Türkün","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the laboratory effects of different whitening toothpastes on human anterior teeth that had undergone in-office bleaching with a 40% hydrogen peroxide (HP) agent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty caries-free human anterior teeth extracted for periodontal or orthodontic reasons were randomly assigned to five groups (n=10): Group 1 (Control) : Bleached but no toothpaste applied; Group 2: Ipana Kalsident Classic Taste toothpaste; Group 3: Colgate Optic White Expert toothpaste; Group 4: Signal White Now Gold toothpaste; Group 5: Opalescence Whitening toothpaste. Baseline and post-bleaching color measurements were performed using a digital spectrophotometer. Following bleaching with 40% HP (Opalescence Boost 40% PF), the control group was brushed with distilled water, while the experimental groups were brushed with the respective toothpastes twice daily for 30 days using a rechargeable toothbrush. Final color measurements were recorded, and color changes (ΔE₀₀) were calculated using the CIE2000 formula. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests (P= 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of whitening toothpastes after bleaching significantly enhanced tooth color. Opalescence Whitening exhibited the greatest effect, followed by Colgate Optic White Expert. Signal White Now Gold demonstrated significantly higher efficacy than Ipana Kalsident Classic Taste. However, no significant difference was observed between the control group and Ipana.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study demonstrated that whitening toothpastes play a beneficial role in maintaining and enhancing tooth color following in-office bleaching. Clinically, the use of an appropriate whitening toothpaste is recommended to prolong and optimize the results of bleaching procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"38 3","pages":"124-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the laboratory effects of different whitening toothpastes on human anterior teeth that had undergone in-office bleaching with a 40% hydrogen peroxide (HP) agent.
Methods: Fifty caries-free human anterior teeth extracted for periodontal or orthodontic reasons were randomly assigned to five groups (n=10): Group 1 (Control) : Bleached but no toothpaste applied; Group 2: Ipana Kalsident Classic Taste toothpaste; Group 3: Colgate Optic White Expert toothpaste; Group 4: Signal White Now Gold toothpaste; Group 5: Opalescence Whitening toothpaste. Baseline and post-bleaching color measurements were performed using a digital spectrophotometer. Following bleaching with 40% HP (Opalescence Boost 40% PF), the control group was brushed with distilled water, while the experimental groups were brushed with the respective toothpastes twice daily for 30 days using a rechargeable toothbrush. Final color measurements were recorded, and color changes (ΔE₀₀) were calculated using the CIE2000 formula. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests (P= 0.05).
Results: The use of whitening toothpastes after bleaching significantly enhanced tooth color. Opalescence Whitening exhibited the greatest effect, followed by Colgate Optic White Expert. Signal White Now Gold demonstrated significantly higher efficacy than Ipana Kalsident Classic Taste. However, no significant difference was observed between the control group and Ipana.
Clinical significance: This study demonstrated that whitening toothpastes play a beneficial role in maintaining and enhancing tooth color following in-office bleaching. Clinically, the use of an appropriate whitening toothpaste is recommended to prolong and optimize the results of bleaching procedures.
目的:评价不同美白牙膏对用40%过氧化氢(HP)剂进行室内漂白的人前牙的实验室效果。方法:50颗因牙周或正畸原因拔出的无龋人前牙随机分为5组(n=10): 1组(对照组):漂白但不涂牙膏;第二组:Ipana Kalsident经典口味牙膏;第三组:高露洁光白专家牙膏;第四组:Signal White Now Gold牙膏;第五组:乳白美白牙膏。基线和漂白后的颜色测量使用数字分光光度计进行。用40% HP (Opalescence Boost 40% PF)漂白后,对照组用蒸馏水刷牙,实验组用可充电牙刷每天刷两次牙膏,持续30天。记录最终的颜色测量结果,并使用CIE2000公式计算颜色变化(ΔE 00)。数据分析采用方差分析和Tukey检验(P= 0.05)。结果:牙齿漂白后使用美白牙膏可明显提高牙齿颜色。乳光美白效果最好,其次是高露洁光学美白专家。“信号白现金”的功效明显高于“伊帕纳·卡尔sident经典口味”。然而,对照组和Ipana之间没有明显差异。临床意义:本研究表明,美白牙膏在办公室漂白后对维持和增强牙齿颜色有有益的作用。临床上,建议使用适当的美白牙膏来延长和优化漂白程序的结果。
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.