Late Preterm Antenatal Corticosteroids in Pregestational and Gestational Diabetic Pregnancies.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lylach Haizler-Cohen, Maria C Alzamora, Nicole R Legro, Leila Eter, Tasha Freed, Suditi Rahematpura, Ayah Arafat, Victoria Greenberg, Sara N Iqbal
{"title":"Late Preterm Antenatal Corticosteroids in Pregestational and Gestational Diabetic Pregnancies.","authors":"Lylach Haizler-Cohen, Maria C Alzamora, Nicole R Legro, Leila Eter, Tasha Freed, Suditi Rahematpura, Ayah Arafat, Victoria Greenberg, Sara N Iqbal","doi":"10.1055/a-2624-8405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to evaluate the association between late preterm antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) administration and the incidence of hypoglycemia and respiratory complications in neonates born to individuals with pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Multi-center retrospective cohort study between 2016 and 2022. Pregnant people with PGDM or GDM who presented in the late preterm period with concern for preterm delivery were included. The indication for admission was classified as preterm labor, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, poorly controlled diabetes, or other maternal/fetal indications. Exclusion criteria included multifetal gestations, fetal anomalies, stillbirths, prior course of ACS, or no anticipation for delivery in the next 7 days. The primary outcome was neonatal hypoglycemia. Secondary outcomes included composite respiratory morbidity, composite nonrespiratory morbidity, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, length of NICU stay, and neonatal death. Multivariable regression models were used to calculate the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for the outcomes after adjusting for an indication for admission, gestational age at delivery, and neonatal birth weight. Outcome data were then stratified by diabetes type (PGDM vs. GDM) and completion status of the ACS course (partial vs. complete). For PGDM pregnancies, outcome data were additionally stratified by glycemic control.In the study period, 453 patients (126 with PGDM and 327 with GDM) were included. Of those, 265 (58.5%) received ACS, and 188 (41.5%) did not. There were no significant differences in neonatal hypoglycemia and composite respiratory morbidity between the ACS and non-ACS groups, including in the subgroup analysis of PGDM and GDM pregnancies. However, late preterm ACS was associated with reductions in supplemental oxygen use, mechanical ventilation, and respiratory distress syndrome when a complete course of ACS was administered. In PGDM pregnancies, neonatal outcomes did not differ between the ACS and non-ACS groups, regardless of glycemic control.Late preterm ACS administration in diabetic pregnancies was not associated with increased neonatal hypoglycemia or improvements in composite respiratory morbidity. · Late preterm steroids in diabetic pregnancies are not associated with neonatal hypoglycemia.. · Composite respiratory morbidity is not improved in this setting.. · Glycemic control does not impact neonatal outcomes with late preterm steroid use..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2624-8405","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the association between late preterm antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) administration and the incidence of hypoglycemia and respiratory complications in neonates born to individuals with pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Multi-center retrospective cohort study between 2016 and 2022. Pregnant people with PGDM or GDM who presented in the late preterm period with concern for preterm delivery were included. The indication for admission was classified as preterm labor, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, poorly controlled diabetes, or other maternal/fetal indications. Exclusion criteria included multifetal gestations, fetal anomalies, stillbirths, prior course of ACS, or no anticipation for delivery in the next 7 days. The primary outcome was neonatal hypoglycemia. Secondary outcomes included composite respiratory morbidity, composite nonrespiratory morbidity, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, length of NICU stay, and neonatal death. Multivariable regression models were used to calculate the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for the outcomes after adjusting for an indication for admission, gestational age at delivery, and neonatal birth weight. Outcome data were then stratified by diabetes type (PGDM vs. GDM) and completion status of the ACS course (partial vs. complete). For PGDM pregnancies, outcome data were additionally stratified by glycemic control.In the study period, 453 patients (126 with PGDM and 327 with GDM) were included. Of those, 265 (58.5%) received ACS, and 188 (41.5%) did not. There were no significant differences in neonatal hypoglycemia and composite respiratory morbidity between the ACS and non-ACS groups, including in the subgroup analysis of PGDM and GDM pregnancies. However, late preterm ACS was associated with reductions in supplemental oxygen use, mechanical ventilation, and respiratory distress syndrome when a complete course of ACS was administered. In PGDM pregnancies, neonatal outcomes did not differ between the ACS and non-ACS groups, regardless of glycemic control.Late preterm ACS administration in diabetic pregnancies was not associated with increased neonatal hypoglycemia or improvements in composite respiratory morbidity. · Late preterm steroids in diabetic pregnancies are not associated with neonatal hypoglycemia.. · Composite respiratory morbidity is not improved in this setting.. · Glycemic control does not impact neonatal outcomes with late preterm steroid use..

妊娠期和妊娠期糖尿病妊娠的晚期早产产前糖皮质激素。
目的:本研究旨在评估晚期早产儿ACS给药与PGDM和GDM患者所生新生儿低血糖和呼吸系统并发症发生率之间的关系。研究设计:2016-2022年多中心回顾性队列研究。妊娠期晚期出现妊娠期糖尿病或妊娠期糖尿病且有早产风险的孕妇被纳入研究对象。早产的指征分为早产、早产产前胎膜破裂或母体/胎儿指征。排除标准包括多胎妊娠、胎儿异常、死产、既往ACS病程或未来7天内无分娩预期。主要结局是新生儿低血糖。次要结局包括复合呼吸道发病率、复合非呼吸道发病率、新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院、NICU住院时间和新生儿死亡。采用多变量回归模型计算经分娩胎龄和新生儿出生体重调整后的结果的优势比和95%置信区间。然后根据糖尿病类型(PGDM vs . GDM)和给药剂量对结果数据进行分层。对于妊娠期糖尿病孕妇,结果数据还根据血糖控制进行分层。结果:研究期间共纳入453例患者(PGDM 126例,GDM 327例)。其中265例(58.5%)接受ACS治疗,188例(41.5%)未接受ACS治疗。包括妊娠期糖尿病和妊娠期糖尿病亚组分析在内,ACS组和非ACS组在新生儿低血糖和复合呼吸系统发病率方面无显著差异。然而,当给予两剂ACS时,晚期早产儿ACS与补充氧使用、机械通气和呼吸窘迫综合征的减少有关。在妊娠期糖尿病孕妇中,无论血糖控制情况如何,ACS组和非ACS组的新生儿结局没有差异。结论:糖尿病妊娠晚期早产儿服用ACS与新生儿低血糖升高或复合呼吸系统发病率改善无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信