A Review of Methods for Long-Term Electric Load Forecasting

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Thangjam Aditya, Sanjita Jaipuria, Pradeep Kumar Dadabada
{"title":"A Review of Methods for Long-Term Electric Load Forecasting","authors":"Thangjam Aditya,&nbsp;Sanjita Jaipuria,&nbsp;Pradeep Kumar Dadabada","doi":"10.1002/for.3248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Long-term load forecasting (LTLF) has been a fundamental least-cost planning tool for electric utilities. In the past, utilities were monopolies and paid less attention to uncertainty in their LTLF methodologies. Nowadays, such casualness is pricey in competitive markets because utilities need to examine the financial implications of forecast uncertainty for survival. Hence, the aim of this paper is to critique the LTLF research trends with a focus on uncertainty quantification (UQ). For this purpose, we examined 40 LTLF articles published between January 2003 and February 2021. We found that UQ is a nascent area of LTLF research. Our review found two approaches to UQ in LTLF: probabilistic scenario analysis and direct probabilistic methods. The former approach is more helpful to risk analysts but has major caveats in addressing interdependencies of socioeconomic and climate scenarios. We identified very little LTLF research that examines uncertainties associated with climate extremes, distributed generation resources, and demand-side management. Lastly, there is enormous potential for mitigating financial risks by embracing asymmetric cost functions in LTLF research. Future LTLF researchers can work on these identified gaps to help utilities in risk estimation, cost-reliability balancing, and estimation of reserve margin under climate change.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47835,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forecasting","volume":"44 4","pages":"1403-1423"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/for.3248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long-term load forecasting (LTLF) has been a fundamental least-cost planning tool for electric utilities. In the past, utilities were monopolies and paid less attention to uncertainty in their LTLF methodologies. Nowadays, such casualness is pricey in competitive markets because utilities need to examine the financial implications of forecast uncertainty for survival. Hence, the aim of this paper is to critique the LTLF research trends with a focus on uncertainty quantification (UQ). For this purpose, we examined 40 LTLF articles published between January 2003 and February 2021. We found that UQ is a nascent area of LTLF research. Our review found two approaches to UQ in LTLF: probabilistic scenario analysis and direct probabilistic methods. The former approach is more helpful to risk analysts but has major caveats in addressing interdependencies of socioeconomic and climate scenarios. We identified very little LTLF research that examines uncertainties associated with climate extremes, distributed generation resources, and demand-side management. Lastly, there is enormous potential for mitigating financial risks by embracing asymmetric cost functions in LTLF research. Future LTLF researchers can work on these identified gaps to help utilities in risk estimation, cost-reliability balancing, and estimation of reserve margin under climate change.

电力负荷长期预测方法综述
长期负荷预测(LTLF)已成为电力公司最低成本规划的基本工具。过去,公用事业公司是垄断企业,对LTLF方法中的不确定性关注较少。如今,在竞争激烈的市场中,这种随意性是昂贵的,因为公用事业公司需要检查预测不确定性对生存的财务影响。因此,本文的目的是批判LTLF的研究趋势,重点是不确定性量化(UQ)。为此,我们研究了2003年1月至2021年2月期间发表的40篇LTLF文章。我们发现昆士兰大学是LTLF研究的一个新兴领域。我们的综述发现了LTLF中UQ的两种方法:概率情景分析和直接概率方法。前一种方法对风险分析师更有帮助,但在处理社会经济和气候情景的相互依赖性方面存在重大缺陷。我们发现很少有LTLF研究涉及与极端气候、分布式发电资源和需求侧管理相关的不确定性。最后,通过在LTLF研究中采用不对称成本函数,可以极大地降低财务风险。未来的LTLF研究人员可以研究这些已确定的差距,以帮助公用事业公司进行风险评估、成本可靠性平衡和气候变化下储备边际的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forecasting is an international journal that publishes refereed papers on forecasting. It is multidisciplinary, welcoming papers dealing with any aspect of forecasting: theoretical, practical, computational and methodological. A broad interpretation of the topic is taken with approaches from various subject areas, such as statistics, economics, psychology, systems engineering and social sciences, all encouraged. Furthermore, the Journal welcomes a wide diversity of applications in such fields as business, government, technology and the environment. Of particular interest are papers dealing with modelling issues and the relationship of forecasting systems to decision-making processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信