Echoes of Bias: An Analysis of ChatGPT in Financial Planner–Client Dialogs

Chet R. Bennetts, Eric T. Ludwig
{"title":"Echoes of Bias: An Analysis of ChatGPT in Financial Planner–Client Dialogs","authors":"Chet R. Bennetts,&nbsp;Eric T. Ludwig","doi":"10.1002/cfp2.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines how the ChatGPT Model 3.5, a large language model, exhibits implicit bias when generating financial planning communications with varying racial identifiers. Using a structured testing framework with 25 combinations of advisor–client racial identifiers, we analyzed AI-generated emails explaining investment diversification. Through content and discourse analysis informed by Critical Algorithm Studies, we found that while core financial advice remained consistent, subtle linguistic variations emerged based on racial identifiers. These variations manifested primarily as unconscious adjustments in tone, cultural references, and language choice rather than substantive differences in financial guidance. Drawing on recent research in AI bias, we introduce a novel 2 × 2 matrix categorizing AI biases along dimensions of explicitness and intentionality. Our findings suggest that even in professional contexts, AI systems may reflect societal patterns encoded in their training data, potentially influencing advisor–client communications. As financial planners increasingly adopt AI tools for client communications and administrative tasks, understanding these subtle biases becomes crucial for maintaining professional standards and fiduciary responsibilities. This research contributes to the growing literature on AI applications in financial planning while highlighting important considerations for practitioners using AI-powered tools in their practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":100529,"journal":{"name":"FINANCIAL PLANNING REVIEW","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cfp2.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FINANCIAL PLANNING REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cfp2.70006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how the ChatGPT Model 3.5, a large language model, exhibits implicit bias when generating financial planning communications with varying racial identifiers. Using a structured testing framework with 25 combinations of advisor–client racial identifiers, we analyzed AI-generated emails explaining investment diversification. Through content and discourse analysis informed by Critical Algorithm Studies, we found that while core financial advice remained consistent, subtle linguistic variations emerged based on racial identifiers. These variations manifested primarily as unconscious adjustments in tone, cultural references, and language choice rather than substantive differences in financial guidance. Drawing on recent research in AI bias, we introduce a novel 2 × 2 matrix categorizing AI biases along dimensions of explicitness and intentionality. Our findings suggest that even in professional contexts, AI systems may reflect societal patterns encoded in their training data, potentially influencing advisor–client communications. As financial planners increasingly adopt AI tools for client communications and administrative tasks, understanding these subtle biases becomes crucial for maintaining professional standards and fiduciary responsibilities. This research contributes to the growing literature on AI applications in financial planning while highlighting important considerations for practitioners using AI-powered tools in their practice.

偏见的回声:对理财规划师-客户对话中的ChatGPT的分析
本研究考察了ChatGPT模型3.5(一个大型语言模型)在生成具有不同种族标识符的财务规划通信时如何表现出隐性偏见。使用包含25种顾问-客户种族标识符组合的结构化测试框架,我们分析了人工智能生成的解释投资多样化的电子邮件。通过Critical Algorithm Studies提供的内容和话语分析,我们发现,尽管核心财务建议保持一致,但基于种族标识符的微妙语言变化出现了。这些差异主要表现为语气、文化参考和语言选择方面的无意识调整,而不是财务指导方面的实质性差异。根据最近对人工智能偏差的研究,我们引入了一个新的2 × 2矩阵,沿显式和意向性维度对人工智能偏差进行分类。我们的研究结果表明,即使在专业环境中,人工智能系统也可能反映其训练数据中编码的社会模式,从而潜在地影响顾问与客户的沟通。随着理财规划师越来越多地采用人工智能工具进行客户沟通和管理任务,了解这些微妙的偏见对于维持专业标准和受托责任至关重要。这项研究有助于越来越多的关于人工智能在财务规划中的应用的文献,同时强调了从业者在实践中使用人工智能工具的重要考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信