Nicole B. Carbone , Nathalie Alberto , Kate Henderson , Nina Pruyn , Wawira Munyi , Paul Waibale , Briana Lucido
{"title":"Use of outcome harvesting to understand the outcomes of a COVID-19 pandemic leadership and management program in six countries","authors":"Nicole B. Carbone , Nathalie Alberto , Kate Henderson , Nina Pruyn , Wawira Munyi , Paul Waibale , Briana Lucido","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global response to COVID-19 highlighted gaps in pandemic preparedness and response. The Leading and Managing for Results in Pandemics (LMRP) program was developed to strengthen the capacity of public health leaders responding to COVID-19. To assess the influence of the program on applying leadership and management practices and on pandemic readiness, a mixed methods outcome harvesting evaluation approach was adapted. Quantitative programmatic data and supplemental qualitative program participant interview data were analyzed to inform draft outcomes. Program participants validated outcomes, which were then updated, triangulated, and used to inform recommendations. The results illustrated increases in applying leadership and management practices, and improvements in team dynamics and morale. Themes from the qualitative interviews included strengthened teamwork, leadership skills, and ability to manage disease outbreaks and future pandemics. The validated outcomes described improvements in leadership and management skills, pandemic readiness, and interpersonal skills following LMRP participation. The evaluation found evidence that LMRP program participants gained knowledge, skills, and tools, which they applied to perform more effectively as a team and to lead preparation for and management of public health emergencies and disease outbreaks. The program brought about positive changes in the systems and processes through which participants approach their work and apply the leading and managing practices to collaboratively work towards a common goal. Similar evaluation approaches should be utilized to understand and contribute to the limited available evidence on the effect of capacity strengthening programs on developing and applying leadership and management skills.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 102619"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000862","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The global response to COVID-19 highlighted gaps in pandemic preparedness and response. The Leading and Managing for Results in Pandemics (LMRP) program was developed to strengthen the capacity of public health leaders responding to COVID-19. To assess the influence of the program on applying leadership and management practices and on pandemic readiness, a mixed methods outcome harvesting evaluation approach was adapted. Quantitative programmatic data and supplemental qualitative program participant interview data were analyzed to inform draft outcomes. Program participants validated outcomes, which were then updated, triangulated, and used to inform recommendations. The results illustrated increases in applying leadership and management practices, and improvements in team dynamics and morale. Themes from the qualitative interviews included strengthened teamwork, leadership skills, and ability to manage disease outbreaks and future pandemics. The validated outcomes described improvements in leadership and management skills, pandemic readiness, and interpersonal skills following LMRP participation. The evaluation found evidence that LMRP program participants gained knowledge, skills, and tools, which they applied to perform more effectively as a team and to lead preparation for and management of public health emergencies and disease outbreaks. The program brought about positive changes in the systems and processes through which participants approach their work and apply the leading and managing practices to collaboratively work towards a common goal. Similar evaluation approaches should be utilized to understand and contribute to the limited available evidence on the effect of capacity strengthening programs on developing and applying leadership and management skills.
期刊介绍:
Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.