Use of outcome harvesting to understand the outcomes of a COVID-19 pandemic leadership and management program in six countries

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Nicole B. Carbone , Nathalie Alberto , Kate Henderson , Nina Pruyn , Wawira Munyi , Paul Waibale , Briana Lucido
{"title":"Use of outcome harvesting to understand the outcomes of a COVID-19 pandemic leadership and management program in six countries","authors":"Nicole B. Carbone ,&nbsp;Nathalie Alberto ,&nbsp;Kate Henderson ,&nbsp;Nina Pruyn ,&nbsp;Wawira Munyi ,&nbsp;Paul Waibale ,&nbsp;Briana Lucido","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global response to COVID-19 highlighted gaps in pandemic preparedness and response. The Leading and Managing for Results in Pandemics (LMRP) program was developed to strengthen the capacity of public health leaders responding to COVID-19. To assess the influence of the program on applying leadership and management practices and on pandemic readiness, a mixed methods outcome harvesting evaluation approach was adapted. Quantitative programmatic data and supplemental qualitative program participant interview data were analyzed to inform draft outcomes. Program participants validated outcomes, which were then updated, triangulated, and used to inform recommendations. The results illustrated increases in applying leadership and management practices, and improvements in team dynamics and morale. Themes from the qualitative interviews included strengthened teamwork, leadership skills, and ability to manage disease outbreaks and future pandemics. The validated outcomes described improvements in leadership and management skills, pandemic readiness, and interpersonal skills following LMRP participation. The evaluation found evidence that LMRP program participants gained knowledge, skills, and tools, which they applied to perform more effectively as a team and to lead preparation for and management of public health emergencies and disease outbreaks. The program brought about positive changes in the systems and processes through which participants approach their work and apply the leading and managing practices to collaboratively work towards a common goal. Similar evaluation approaches should be utilized to understand and contribute to the limited available evidence on the effect of capacity strengthening programs on developing and applying leadership and management skills.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 102619"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000862","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global response to COVID-19 highlighted gaps in pandemic preparedness and response. The Leading and Managing for Results in Pandemics (LMRP) program was developed to strengthen the capacity of public health leaders responding to COVID-19. To assess the influence of the program on applying leadership and management practices and on pandemic readiness, a mixed methods outcome harvesting evaluation approach was adapted. Quantitative programmatic data and supplemental qualitative program participant interview data were analyzed to inform draft outcomes. Program participants validated outcomes, which were then updated, triangulated, and used to inform recommendations. The results illustrated increases in applying leadership and management practices, and improvements in team dynamics and morale. Themes from the qualitative interviews included strengthened teamwork, leadership skills, and ability to manage disease outbreaks and future pandemics. The validated outcomes described improvements in leadership and management skills, pandemic readiness, and interpersonal skills following LMRP participation. The evaluation found evidence that LMRP program participants gained knowledge, skills, and tools, which they applied to perform more effectively as a team and to lead preparation for and management of public health emergencies and disease outbreaks. The program brought about positive changes in the systems and processes through which participants approach their work and apply the leading and managing practices to collaboratively work towards a common goal. Similar evaluation approaches should be utilized to understand and contribute to the limited available evidence on the effect of capacity strengthening programs on developing and applying leadership and management skills.
利用成果收集了解六个国家COVID-19大流行领导和管理项目的成果
2019冠状病毒病的全球应对凸显了大流行防范和应对方面的差距。制定了大流行成果领导和管理(LMRP)项目,以加强公共卫生领导人应对COVID-19的能力。为了评估该方案对应用领导和管理做法以及对大流行病准备的影响,采用了一种混合方法成果收获评估方法。定量项目数据和补充的定性项目参与者访谈数据进行分析,为草案结果提供信息。项目参与者验证了结果,然后对结果进行更新、三角测量,并用于提供建议。结果表明,领导力和管理实践的应用有所增加,团队动力和士气也有所改善。定性访谈的主题包括加强团队合作、领导技能以及管理疾病暴发和未来大流行的能力。经过验证的结果描述了参与LMRP后在领导和管理技能、大流行准备和人际交往能力方面的改进。评估发现,有证据表明,LMRP项目参与者获得了知识、技能和工具,他们将这些知识、技能和工具应用于更有效的团队工作,并领导公共卫生紧急情况和疾病暴发的准备和管理。该计划在系统和过程中带来了积极的变化,通过参与者接近他们的工作,并应用领导和管理实践,协同工作,实现共同的目标。应该利用类似的评估方法来理解和贡献有限的现有证据,证明能力加强计划对发展和应用领导和管理技能的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信