Debarati Bhanja, Junjia Zhu, Hannah Wilding, Jorge Benavides-Vasquez, Leonardo de Macedo Filho, Ahmad Ozair, Camille Moeckel, Aarav Badani, Jinpyo Hong, Jeffrey Sivik, Joseph J. Drabick, Colette R. Pameijer, Kim Margolin, Manmeet Ahluwalia, Alireza Mansouri
{"title":"A population-level real-world analysis and single-center validation of melanoma brain metastasis epidemiology following dual-agent immunotherapy","authors":"Debarati Bhanja, Junjia Zhu, Hannah Wilding, Jorge Benavides-Vasquez, Leonardo de Macedo Filho, Ahmad Ozair, Camille Moeckel, Aarav Badani, Jinpyo Hong, Jeffrey Sivik, Joseph J. Drabick, Colette R. Pameijer, Kim Margolin, Manmeet Ahluwalia, Alireza Mansouri","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-2681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Melanoma brain metastases (MBM) are common in advanced melanoma and linked to poor prognosis. Preventing MBM can improve survival and reduce morbidity. While dual-agent immunotherapy (dIT) improves survival, its role in MBM prevention is unclear. We compared MBM incidence, overall survival (OS), and brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS) between dIT and single-agent immunotherapies (sIT). Experimental Design: A real-world multi-institutional database identified melanoma patients without MBM at immunotherapy (IT) initiation. Patients were stratified by anti-CTLA4, anti-PD1, and combo anti-CTLA4/anti-PD1 (dIT) treatment. MBM incidences were measured within 5 years post-IT initiation and compared with risk ratios (RR). In a complementary single-institution cohort, median OS and BMFS were compared between dIT, anti-CTLA4, and anti-PD1 via log-rank tests and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models. Results: TriNetX identified 8,287 patients receiving anti-CTLA (3,205), anti-PD1 (3,218), and dIT (1,864). MBM incidence was significantly lower in dIT (8.6%) and anti-PD1 (7.8%) vs. anti-CTLA4 (12.2%) cohorts, (RR[95% CI], 0.72[0.61-0.86] and 0.63[0.57-0.70], respectively). There was no significant difference in MBM incidence between anti-PD1 (7.8%) and dIT (8.6%) (RR[95% CI], 1.13[0.93-1.36]). In the single-institution analysis (n=119), 2-year OS probabilities were 90%, 80%, and 95%, and 2-year BMFS probabilities were 72.7%, 80%, and 95.7%, in the dIT, anti-CTLA4, and anti-PD1 cohorts, respectively. DIT and anti-PD1 showed improved early-phase protection against MBM development. Number of metastatic sites was significantly associated with MBM development (HR 2.36; 95% CI [1.22-4.58]; p=0.01). Conclusions: These findings highlight dIT’s potential role in primary prophylaxis against MBM, with anti-PD1 as the likely work horse agent. Prospective studies are warranted.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-2681","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Melanoma brain metastases (MBM) are common in advanced melanoma and linked to poor prognosis. Preventing MBM can improve survival and reduce morbidity. While dual-agent immunotherapy (dIT) improves survival, its role in MBM prevention is unclear. We compared MBM incidence, overall survival (OS), and brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS) between dIT and single-agent immunotherapies (sIT). Experimental Design: A real-world multi-institutional database identified melanoma patients without MBM at immunotherapy (IT) initiation. Patients were stratified by anti-CTLA4, anti-PD1, and combo anti-CTLA4/anti-PD1 (dIT) treatment. MBM incidences were measured within 5 years post-IT initiation and compared with risk ratios (RR). In a complementary single-institution cohort, median OS and BMFS were compared between dIT, anti-CTLA4, and anti-PD1 via log-rank tests and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models. Results: TriNetX identified 8,287 patients receiving anti-CTLA (3,205), anti-PD1 (3,218), and dIT (1,864). MBM incidence was significantly lower in dIT (8.6%) and anti-PD1 (7.8%) vs. anti-CTLA4 (12.2%) cohorts, (RR[95% CI], 0.72[0.61-0.86] and 0.63[0.57-0.70], respectively). There was no significant difference in MBM incidence between anti-PD1 (7.8%) and dIT (8.6%) (RR[95% CI], 1.13[0.93-1.36]). In the single-institution analysis (n=119), 2-year OS probabilities were 90%, 80%, and 95%, and 2-year BMFS probabilities were 72.7%, 80%, and 95.7%, in the dIT, anti-CTLA4, and anti-PD1 cohorts, respectively. DIT and anti-PD1 showed improved early-phase protection against MBM development. Number of metastatic sites was significantly associated with MBM development (HR 2.36; 95% CI [1.22-4.58]; p=0.01). Conclusions: These findings highlight dIT’s potential role in primary prophylaxis against MBM, with anti-PD1 as the likely work horse agent. Prospective studies are warranted.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.