Emergency Department Visits for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in the United States.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Melissa A Markowitz, Brad St Martin, Lisbet S Lundsberg, Nancy E Ringel
{"title":"Emergency Department Visits for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in the United States.","authors":"Melissa A Markowitz, Brad St Martin, Lisbet S Lundsberg, Nancy E Ringel","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Little is known regarding patient use of the emergency department for prolapse symptoms and the burden this use places on the health care system.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of emergency department visits in the United States for pelvic organ prolapse and associated patient and hospital demographics.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of emergency department presentations from 2016 to 2018 associated with a primary diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse. Data were obtained using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Emergency Department Samples. Descriptive analysis was used to identify sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the population presenting to the emergency department for prolapse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2016 and 2018, there were 14,101 annual emergency department visits for prolapse in the United States, which comprised less than 0.01% of all emergency department visits. Overall, 55.5% of patients were <65 years old and 62.5% had a household income of <50th percentile ($0-$58,999). The most common secondary diagnosis was hypertension (12.3%), and the most common secondary urogynecologic diagnosis was urinary tract infection or pyelonephritis (5.7%). No high-risk comorbidities were seen in 78.1% of patients. Most patients with prolapse were discharged (91.8%), although 5.8% were admitted and 1.5% were transferred for further care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emergency department presentation for pelvic organ prolapse is uncommon. Disproportionate emergency department use was seen for patients <65 years old and with low household income. Further initiatives can optimize outpatient workflows for urogynecologic care and expand community outreach efforts on prolapse education to reduce emergency department use for nonurgent concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Little is known regarding patient use of the emergency department for prolapse symptoms and the burden this use places on the health care system.

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of emergency department visits in the United States for pelvic organ prolapse and associated patient and hospital demographics.

Study design: This was a cross-sectional study of emergency department presentations from 2016 to 2018 associated with a primary diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse. Data were obtained using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Emergency Department Samples. Descriptive analysis was used to identify sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the population presenting to the emergency department for prolapse.

Results: Between 2016 and 2018, there were 14,101 annual emergency department visits for prolapse in the United States, which comprised less than 0.01% of all emergency department visits. Overall, 55.5% of patients were <65 years old and 62.5% had a household income of <50th percentile ($0-$58,999). The most common secondary diagnosis was hypertension (12.3%), and the most common secondary urogynecologic diagnosis was urinary tract infection or pyelonephritis (5.7%). No high-risk comorbidities were seen in 78.1% of patients. Most patients with prolapse were discharged (91.8%), although 5.8% were admitted and 1.5% were transferred for further care.

Conclusions: Emergency department presentation for pelvic organ prolapse is uncommon. Disproportionate emergency department use was seen for patients <65 years old and with low household income. Further initiatives can optimize outpatient workflows for urogynecologic care and expand community outreach efforts on prolapse education to reduce emergency department use for nonurgent concerns.

美国盆腔器官脱垂的急诊科就诊情况
重要性:关于患者因脱垂症状而使用急诊科以及这种使用对卫生保健系统造成的负担,我们知之甚少。目的:本研究的目的是评估美国盆腔器官脱垂的急诊就诊发生率以及相关的患者和医院人口统计数据。研究设计:这是一项横断面研究,研究了2016年至2018年与盆腔器官脱垂初步诊断相关的急诊科报告。数据采用国际疾病分类第十版临床修改代码,来自全国急诊科医疗成本与利用项目样本。描述性分析用于确定因脱垂而到急诊科就诊的人群的社会人口学和临床特征。结果:2016年至2018年,美国每年有14101例脱垂急诊就诊,占所有急诊就诊的不到0.01%。结论:盆腔器官脱垂的急诊表现并不常见。患者使用急诊科的比例过高
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信