Black and Hispanic Women's Views on LUTS Treatment and a Home-Based Intervention.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Oluwateniola Brown, Eloisa Serrano, Julia Geynisman-Tan, Melissa Simon, James W Griffith, Kimberly Kenton
{"title":"Black and Hispanic Women's Views on LUTS Treatment and a Home-Based Intervention.","authors":"Oluwateniola Brown, Eloisa Serrano, Julia Geynisman-Tan, Melissa Simon, James W Griffith, Kimberly Kenton","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine facilitators and barriers to treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms among care-seeking Black and Hispanic women and to explore perspectives on \"SUPPORT,\" a self-directed, 8-week, home-based intervention combining education, bladder retraining, pelvic floor muscle training, and cognitive behavior therapy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a qualitative observational study. We recruited a convenience sample of care-seeking women with lower urinary tract symptoms who self-identified as Black race or Hispanic ethnicity and were English or Spanish speaking. We conducted focus groups in the participants' primary language. Two authors analyzed the focus group transcripts using modified grounded theory techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 27 participants and conducted 7 focus groups. There were 13 non-Hispanic Black and 14 Hispanic participants. The mean ± SD age of the cohort was 49 ± 14 years. Barriers reported by both Black and Hispanic participants included (1) unfamiliarity with treatment options and negative perceptions of procedural treatments, (2) unsatisfactory interactions with the health care team, (3) travel distance for treatment, and (4) resources. Barriers distinct to Spanish-speaking and Black participants were inadequate interpreter services and feeling blocked from accessing care by clinic staff, respectively. Facilitators of treatment included (1) patient-centered clinical environments, (2) streamlined financial assistance services, and (3) shared treatment decision making. Most participants found the SUPPORT intervention concept promising for reducing psychosocial stress related to lower urinary tract symptoms and potentially overcoming various barriers to treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants reported multilevel barriers to lower urinary tract treatments. The concept of the SUPPORT intervention was acceptable to participants and may overcome barriers to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to examine facilitators and barriers to treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms among care-seeking Black and Hispanic women and to explore perspectives on "SUPPORT," a self-directed, 8-week, home-based intervention combining education, bladder retraining, pelvic floor muscle training, and cognitive behavior therapy.

Study design: This was a qualitative observational study. We recruited a convenience sample of care-seeking women with lower urinary tract symptoms who self-identified as Black race or Hispanic ethnicity and were English or Spanish speaking. We conducted focus groups in the participants' primary language. Two authors analyzed the focus group transcripts using modified grounded theory techniques.

Results: We enrolled 27 participants and conducted 7 focus groups. There were 13 non-Hispanic Black and 14 Hispanic participants. The mean ± SD age of the cohort was 49 ± 14 years. Barriers reported by both Black and Hispanic participants included (1) unfamiliarity with treatment options and negative perceptions of procedural treatments, (2) unsatisfactory interactions with the health care team, (3) travel distance for treatment, and (4) resources. Barriers distinct to Spanish-speaking and Black participants were inadequate interpreter services and feeling blocked from accessing care by clinic staff, respectively. Facilitators of treatment included (1) patient-centered clinical environments, (2) streamlined financial assistance services, and (3) shared treatment decision making. Most participants found the SUPPORT intervention concept promising for reducing psychosocial stress related to lower urinary tract symptoms and potentially overcoming various barriers to treatment.

Conclusion: Participants reported multilevel barriers to lower urinary tract treatments. The concept of the SUPPORT intervention was acceptable to participants and may overcome barriers to treatment.

黑人和西班牙裔妇女对LUTS治疗和家庭干预的看法。
目的:本研究旨在研究寻求护理的黑人和西班牙裔妇女治疗下尿路症状的促进因素和障碍,并探讨“支持”的观点,“支持”是一种自我指导的、为期8周的、以家庭为基础的干预,结合教育、膀胱再训练、盆底肌肉训练和认知行为治疗。研究设计:本研究为定性观察性研究。我们招募了一个方便的样本,自认是黑人或西班牙裔,会说英语或西班牙语,有下尿路症状的求医妇女。我们以参与者的主要语言进行焦点小组讨论。两位作者使用改进的扎根理论技术分析了焦点小组记录。结果:我们招募了27名参与者,进行了7个焦点小组。有13名非西班牙裔黑人和14名西班牙裔参与者。队列的平均±SD年龄为49±14岁。黑人和西班牙裔参与者报告的障碍包括(1)对治疗方案的不熟悉和对程序性治疗的负面看法,(2)与卫生保健团队的互动不满意,(3)治疗的旅行距离,以及(4)资源。西班牙语和黑人参与者的明显障碍分别是翻译服务不足和感觉无法获得诊所工作人员的护理。促进治疗的因素包括:(1)以患者为中心的临床环境;(2)精简的财政援助服务;(3)共享治疗决策。大多数参与者发现,支持干预概念有望减少与下尿路症状相关的社会心理压力,并有可能克服各种治疗障碍。结论:参与者报告了下尿路治疗的多级障碍。支持干预的概念为参与者所接受,并可能克服治疗障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信