Protocol: Applying co-production and peer research approaches with community organisations to develop a blueprint for the centre for Co-Production and Peer Research (CoPPeR) network.

NIHR open research Pub Date : 2025-04-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3310/nihropenres.13886.1
Nazish Mahmood, Rosemary R C McEachan, Bridget Lockyer, Chloe Parekh, Chris Cartwright, Daniel Balaz, Gulsoom Akhtar, Jennifer Hall, Lauren Batty, Tahira Amin, Zille Huma Dogra, Shahid Islam
{"title":"Protocol: Applying co-production and peer research approaches with community organisations to develop a blueprint for the centre for Co-Production and Peer Research (CoPPeR) network.","authors":"Nazish Mahmood, Rosemary R C McEachan, Bridget Lockyer, Chloe Parekh, Chris Cartwright, Daniel Balaz, Gulsoom Akhtar, Jennifer Hall, Lauren Batty, Tahira Amin, Zille Huma Dogra, Shahid Islam","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13886.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community inclusive approaches in research contribute to the quality and impact of health outcomes, yet communities often lack considerable influence over research processes. The Co-Production and Peer Research (CoPPeR) network aims to redress this gap by fostering equitable partnerships between communities, researchers, and policymakers. This paper outlines the protocol for establishing the CoPPeR network in Bradford, UK, where community-driven research initiatives are crucial for addressing local health disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will implement four work-packages using participatory research methods and citizen science approaches. We will collaborate with four community organisations, each located in geographically distinct neighbourhoods serving diverse communities. Together we will co-produce citizen science projects to explore the impact of local environments on residents' health and wellbeing. We will build capacity through providing funding and training to community organisations who will recruit 20 peer researchers across the four areas to design, implement, and analyse their individual research projects. We will co-evaluate the co-production processes in a concomitant way through stakeholder workshops. Finally, we will explore the readiness and opportunities for statutory health and research partners to embed the CoPPeR network.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anticipated results include comprehensive case studies revealing the factors which affect health and wellbeing in each of the case study sites along with the mechanisms of co-production strategies for enhancing community influence in research. The evaluation will provide us with evidence on what works for which communities; this will be crucial to support our plans for developing a network to augment efforts to advance community inclusive approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CoPPeR network aims to enable long-term sustainable partnership between researchers, decision makers and seldom heard communities which will enable effective co-production of research and policy. By detailing our experiences and outcomes we hope that others, both in the UK and internationally, can learn from and replicate our approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"5 ","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12123296/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13886.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community inclusive approaches in research contribute to the quality and impact of health outcomes, yet communities often lack considerable influence over research processes. The Co-Production and Peer Research (CoPPeR) network aims to redress this gap by fostering equitable partnerships between communities, researchers, and policymakers. This paper outlines the protocol for establishing the CoPPeR network in Bradford, UK, where community-driven research initiatives are crucial for addressing local health disparities.

Methods: We will implement four work-packages using participatory research methods and citizen science approaches. We will collaborate with four community organisations, each located in geographically distinct neighbourhoods serving diverse communities. Together we will co-produce citizen science projects to explore the impact of local environments on residents' health and wellbeing. We will build capacity through providing funding and training to community organisations who will recruit 20 peer researchers across the four areas to design, implement, and analyse their individual research projects. We will co-evaluate the co-production processes in a concomitant way through stakeholder workshops. Finally, we will explore the readiness and opportunities for statutory health and research partners to embed the CoPPeR network.

Results: Anticipated results include comprehensive case studies revealing the factors which affect health and wellbeing in each of the case study sites along with the mechanisms of co-production strategies for enhancing community influence in research. The evaluation will provide us with evidence on what works for which communities; this will be crucial to support our plans for developing a network to augment efforts to advance community inclusive approaches.

Conclusion: The CoPPeR network aims to enable long-term sustainable partnership between researchers, decision makers and seldom heard communities which will enable effective co-production of research and policy. By detailing our experiences and outcomes we hope that others, both in the UK and internationally, can learn from and replicate our approach.

议定书:与社区组织应用合作生产和同行研究方法,为合作生产和同行研究中心(CoPPeR)网络制定蓝图。
背景:研究中的社区包容性方法有助于提高健康结果的质量和影响,但社区往往对研究过程缺乏相当大的影响力。合作生产和同行研究(CoPPeR)网络旨在通过促进社区、研究人员和决策者之间的公平伙伴关系来弥补这一差距。本文概述了在英国Bradford建立CoPPeR网络的协议,在那里,社区驱动的研究活动对于解决当地的卫生差距至关重要。方法:我们将采用参与式研究方法和公民科学方法实施四个工作包。我们将与四个社区组织合作,每个组织位于地理位置不同的社区,为不同的社区提供服务。我们将共同开展公民科学项目,探索当地环境对居民健康和福祉的影响。我们将通过向社区组织提供资金和培训来建设能力,这些组织将在这四个领域招募20名同行科学家来设计、实施和分析他们的个人研究项目。我们将通过利益相关方研讨会,共同评估合作生产过程。最后,我们将探讨法定卫生和研究伙伴嵌入铜网的准备情况和机会。结果:预期的结果包括全面的案例研究,揭示影响每个案例研究地点的健康和福祉的因素,以及加强社区在研究中的影响力的合作生产战略机制。评估将为我们提供证据,说明什么对哪些社区有效;这对于支持我们发展网络的计划至关重要,以加强推进社区包容性方法的努力。结论:CoPPeR网络的目标是在研究人员、决策者和很少听到的社区之间建立长期可持续的伙伴关系,这将使研究和政策的有效联合生产成为可能。通过详细介绍我们的经验和成果,我们希望英国和国际上的其他人可以学习和复制我们的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信