Long-Term Benefits of N-Butylphthalide in Preventing Ischemic Stroke Recurrence: A 12-Month Prospective Study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Pub Date : 2025-05-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S521562
Wei Liu, Yingzhe Shao, Jie Liu, Juan Hao, Yuting Lu, Li Yang, Jinghua Wang, Xianjia Ning
{"title":"Long-Term Benefits of N-Butylphthalide in Preventing Ischemic Stroke Recurrence: A 12-Month Prospective Study.","authors":"Wei Liu, Yingzhe Shao, Jie Liu, Juan Hao, Yuting Lu, Li Yang, Jinghua Wang, Xianjia Ning","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S521562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the effects of 12 months of NBP treatment on stroke recurrence and examined the influence of age and gender on its efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort of 1109 patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke (IS) within six months was divided into NBP (n = 538) and control (n = 571) groups. The NBP group received NBP plus standard treatment, while the control group received standard treatment alone. Primary outcomes were recurrent ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke over 12 months. Secondary outcomes included functional status (modified Rankin Scale, m-RS) and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NBP reduced recurrent IS by 39% compared to controls (RR:0.61,95% CI:0.40-0.93, P=0.022) and total stroke events by 39.6% (RR:0.60,95% CI:0.40-0.91,P=0.016). Protective effects were more significant in males (RR:0.52,95% CI:0.30-0.91, P=0.021 vs RR:0.53,95% CI:0.40-0.91,P=0.021) and in patients under 70 years (P<0.05). Functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale and Barthel index) and all-cause mortality did not differ significantly between groups (all P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NBP significantly reduces stroke recurrence and overall vascular events, especially in males and younger patients. While it does not improve functional outcomes or mortality, NBP demonstrates substantial preventive value for recurrent strokes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22977,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"21 ","pages":"781-792"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12126106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S521562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the effects of 12 months of NBP treatment on stroke recurrence and examined the influence of age and gender on its efficacy.

Methods: A prospective cohort of 1109 patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke (IS) within six months was divided into NBP (n = 538) and control (n = 571) groups. The NBP group received NBP plus standard treatment, while the control group received standard treatment alone. Primary outcomes were recurrent ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke over 12 months. Secondary outcomes included functional status (modified Rankin Scale, m-RS) and all-cause mortality.

Results: NBP reduced recurrent IS by 39% compared to controls (RR:0.61,95% CI:0.40-0.93, P=0.022) and total stroke events by 39.6% (RR:0.60,95% CI:0.40-0.91,P=0.016). Protective effects were more significant in males (RR:0.52,95% CI:0.30-0.91, P=0.021 vs RR:0.53,95% CI:0.40-0.91,P=0.021) and in patients under 70 years (P<0.05). Functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale and Barthel index) and all-cause mortality did not differ significantly between groups (all P>0.05).

Conclusion: NBP significantly reduces stroke recurrence and overall vascular events, especially in males and younger patients. While it does not improve functional outcomes or mortality, NBP demonstrates substantial preventive value for recurrent strokes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

n -丁苯酞预防缺血性卒中复发的长期益处:一项12个月的前瞻性研究。
目的:本研究评价NBP治疗12个月对脑卒中复发的影响,并探讨年龄和性别对其疗效的影响。方法:对1109例6个月内非心栓塞性缺血性卒中(IS)患者进行前瞻性队列研究,分为NBP组(n = 538)和对照组(n = 571)。NBP组给予NBP加标准治疗,对照组单独给予标准治疗。主要结局是12个月内缺血性和出血性卒中复发。次要结局包括功能状态(改良Rankin量表,m-RS)和全因死亡率。结果:与对照组相比,NBP减少了39%的复发性IS (RR:0.61,95% CI:0.40-0.93, P=0.022),总卒中事件减少了39.6% (RR:0.60,95% CI:0.40-0.91,P=0.016)。在男性(RR:0.52,95% CI:0.30-0.91, P=0.021 vs RR:0.53,95% CI:0.40-0.91,P=0.021)和70岁以下患者(P0.05)中保护作用更为显著。结论:NBP可显著降低卒中复发和总体血管事件,尤其是在男性和年轻患者中。虽然它不能改善功能结果或死亡率,但NBP对复发性卒中具有重要的预防价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
139
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas. The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信