Wei Liu, Yingzhe Shao, Jie Liu, Juan Hao, Yuting Lu, Li Yang, Jinghua Wang, Xianjia Ning
{"title":"Long-Term Benefits of N-Butylphthalide in Preventing Ischemic Stroke Recurrence: A 12-Month Prospective Study.","authors":"Wei Liu, Yingzhe Shao, Jie Liu, Juan Hao, Yuting Lu, Li Yang, Jinghua Wang, Xianjia Ning","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S521562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the effects of 12 months of NBP treatment on stroke recurrence and examined the influence of age and gender on its efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort of 1109 patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke (IS) within six months was divided into NBP (n = 538) and control (n = 571) groups. The NBP group received NBP plus standard treatment, while the control group received standard treatment alone. Primary outcomes were recurrent ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke over 12 months. Secondary outcomes included functional status (modified Rankin Scale, m-RS) and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NBP reduced recurrent IS by 39% compared to controls (RR:0.61,95% CI:0.40-0.93, P=0.022) and total stroke events by 39.6% (RR:0.60,95% CI:0.40-0.91,P=0.016). Protective effects were more significant in males (RR:0.52,95% CI:0.30-0.91, P=0.021 vs RR:0.53,95% CI:0.40-0.91,P=0.021) and in patients under 70 years (P<0.05). Functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale and Barthel index) and all-cause mortality did not differ significantly between groups (all P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NBP significantly reduces stroke recurrence and overall vascular events, especially in males and younger patients. While it does not improve functional outcomes or mortality, NBP demonstrates substantial preventive value for recurrent strokes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22977,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"21 ","pages":"781-792"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12126106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S521562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated the effects of 12 months of NBP treatment on stroke recurrence and examined the influence of age and gender on its efficacy.
Methods: A prospective cohort of 1109 patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke (IS) within six months was divided into NBP (n = 538) and control (n = 571) groups. The NBP group received NBP plus standard treatment, while the control group received standard treatment alone. Primary outcomes were recurrent ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke over 12 months. Secondary outcomes included functional status (modified Rankin Scale, m-RS) and all-cause mortality.
Results: NBP reduced recurrent IS by 39% compared to controls (RR:0.61,95% CI:0.40-0.93, P=0.022) and total stroke events by 39.6% (RR:0.60,95% CI:0.40-0.91,P=0.016). Protective effects were more significant in males (RR:0.52,95% CI:0.30-0.91, P=0.021 vs RR:0.53,95% CI:0.40-0.91,P=0.021) and in patients under 70 years (P<0.05). Functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale and Barthel index) and all-cause mortality did not differ significantly between groups (all P>0.05).
Conclusion: NBP significantly reduces stroke recurrence and overall vascular events, especially in males and younger patients. While it does not improve functional outcomes or mortality, NBP demonstrates substantial preventive value for recurrent strokes.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas.
The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature.
As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.