The Importance of a Methodological Manual for Economic Evaluations in Healthcare Decision-Making in Ecuador.

IF 2 Q2 ECONOMICS
Ricardo Yajamín-Villamarín
{"title":"The Importance of a Methodological Manual for Economic Evaluations in Healthcare Decision-Making in Ecuador.","authors":"Ricardo Yajamín-Villamarín","doi":"10.1007/s41669-025-00585-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article provides an overview of Ecuador's Methodological Manual for Economic Evaluations of Health Technologies, emphasizing its importance, key methodological aspects, and relevance within the country's health technology assessment (HTA) framework. The manual establishes standardized guidelines for conducting economic evaluations, incorporating international best practices while adapting them to the national context. It outlines essential methodological components, including decision problem definition, economic evaluation types, cost estimation, use of decision models, and sensitivity analysis. Additionally, it highlights the role of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost-effectiveness thresholds in supporting evidence-based decision-making. Beyond its methodological contributions, the manual plays a crucial role in institutionalizing economic evaluations in Ecuador's healthcare system. By promoting transparency, consistency, and technical rigor, it strengthens the integration of economic evidence into policy decisions, ensuring efficient resource allocation. However, challenges persist, including limitations in technical capacity, data availability, and the need for further refinement of local cost-effectiveness thresholds and indirect cost valuation. This article also explores the broader policy implications of adopting the manual within Ecuador's HTA framework. Strengthening institutional capacity, improving data infrastructure, and fostering international collaboration will be essential to its successful implementation. By embedding economic evaluations into healthcare decision-making, Ecuador can enhance the sustainability of its health system, optimize expenditures, and improve access to cost-effective health technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19770,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-025-00585-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article provides an overview of Ecuador's Methodological Manual for Economic Evaluations of Health Technologies, emphasizing its importance, key methodological aspects, and relevance within the country's health technology assessment (HTA) framework. The manual establishes standardized guidelines for conducting economic evaluations, incorporating international best practices while adapting them to the national context. It outlines essential methodological components, including decision problem definition, economic evaluation types, cost estimation, use of decision models, and sensitivity analysis. Additionally, it highlights the role of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost-effectiveness thresholds in supporting evidence-based decision-making. Beyond its methodological contributions, the manual plays a crucial role in institutionalizing economic evaluations in Ecuador's healthcare system. By promoting transparency, consistency, and technical rigor, it strengthens the integration of economic evidence into policy decisions, ensuring efficient resource allocation. However, challenges persist, including limitations in technical capacity, data availability, and the need for further refinement of local cost-effectiveness thresholds and indirect cost valuation. This article also explores the broader policy implications of adopting the manual within Ecuador's HTA framework. Strengthening institutional capacity, improving data infrastructure, and fostering international collaboration will be essential to its successful implementation. By embedding economic evaluations into healthcare decision-making, Ecuador can enhance the sustainability of its health system, optimize expenditures, and improve access to cost-effective health technologies.

厄瓜多尔医疗保健决策中经济评估方法手册的重要性。
本文概述了厄瓜多尔的《卫生技术经济评估方法手册》,强调了其重要性、关键方法方面以及在该国卫生技术评估(HTA)框架中的相关性。该手册制订了进行经济评价的标准化准则,纳入国际最佳做法,同时使其适应本国情况。它概述了基本的方法论组成部分,包括决策问题定义、经济评估类型、成本估计、决策模型的使用和敏感性分析。此外,它强调了质量调整生命年(QALYs)和成本效益阈值在支持循证决策中的作用。除了方法上的贡献之外,该手册在厄瓜多尔医疗保健系统的经济评估制度化方面发挥着至关重要的作用。通过提高透明度、一致性和技术严谨性,它加强了将经济证据纳入决策的力度,确保了有效的资源配置。然而,挑战仍然存在,包括技术能力、数据可用性方面的限制,以及需要进一步完善当地成本效益阈值和间接成本估值。本文还探讨了在厄瓜多尔HTA框架内采用该手册的更广泛的政策影响。加强机构能力、改善数据基础设施和促进国际合作对其成功实施至关重要。通过将经济评估纳入医疗保健决策,厄瓜多尔可以增强其卫生系统的可持续性,优化支出,并改善获得具有成本效益的卫生技术的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics - Open focuses on applied research on the economic implications and health outcomes associated with drugs, devices and other healthcare interventions. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas:Economic analysis of healthcare interventionsHealth outcomes researchCost-of-illness studiesQuality-of-life studiesAdditional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in PharmacoEconomics -Open may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信