Chensi Ouyang, Alexander Wang, Morgan Briggs, Grace Maszy, Hannah Lewis, Isabel Green, Meryl Alappattu, Georgine Lamvu
{"title":"Changes in Sexual Function After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy in Reproductive-Aged Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Chensi Ouyang, Alexander Wang, Morgan Briggs, Grace Maszy, Hannah Lewis, Isabel Green, Meryl Alappattu, Georgine Lamvu","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.05.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>One primary concern among patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) is postsurgical sexual function. Conflicting evidence exists due to variability in the sexual function measures, the menopause status of patients, and the inclusion of data from laparotomies. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of MIH on sexual function in premenopausal women while accounting for these confounders.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Data search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Science Direct, ProQuest, and EBSCO from inception to December 31, 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The initial search yielded 1124 papers, and 8 studies met eligibility criteria. Eligibility criteria included reporting on sexual function using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), MIH for benign and nonurogynecological conditions, and a study population of premenopausal women. MIH routes included laparoscopic and vaginal surgeries. The primary outcome of interest was a change in the total FSFI score and domains pre- and postsurgery.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>Meta-analysis was performed for each outcome using Cochrane Review Manager 5. Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using pre- and postsurgery FSFI scores. The mean difference between pre- and posthysterectomy FSFI scores showed a small statistically significant improvement in sexual function after surgery: -1.54 (CI -2.83, -0.25). There were small statistically significant improvements in sexual function in the domains of desire (-0.75, CI -1.34, -0.17), arousal (-0.85, CI -1.46, -0.25), orgasm (-0.46, CI -0.81, -0.12), and satisfaction (-0.69, CI -1.20, -0.18). There were no statistically significant changes in the domains of lubrication and pain. The level of evidence is low, with moderate heterogeneity and risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After hysterectomy with ovarian preservation, premenopausal women report small, yet statistically significant, improvement in overall sexual function, which is not likely clinically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.05.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: One primary concern among patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) is postsurgical sexual function. Conflicting evidence exists due to variability in the sexual function measures, the menopause status of patients, and the inclusion of data from laparotomies. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of MIH on sexual function in premenopausal women while accounting for these confounders.
Data sources: Data search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Science Direct, ProQuest, and EBSCO from inception to December 31, 2024.
Methods: The initial search yielded 1124 papers, and 8 studies met eligibility criteria. Eligibility criteria included reporting on sexual function using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), MIH for benign and nonurogynecological conditions, and a study population of premenopausal women. MIH routes included laparoscopic and vaginal surgeries. The primary outcome of interest was a change in the total FSFI score and domains pre- and postsurgery.
Tabulation, integration, and results: Meta-analysis was performed for each outcome using Cochrane Review Manager 5. Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using pre- and postsurgery FSFI scores. The mean difference between pre- and posthysterectomy FSFI scores showed a small statistically significant improvement in sexual function after surgery: -1.54 (CI -2.83, -0.25). There were small statistically significant improvements in sexual function in the domains of desire (-0.75, CI -1.34, -0.17), arousal (-0.85, CI -1.46, -0.25), orgasm (-0.46, CI -0.81, -0.12), and satisfaction (-0.69, CI -1.20, -0.18). There were no statistically significant changes in the domains of lubrication and pain. The level of evidence is low, with moderate heterogeneity and risk of bias.
Conclusion: After hysterectomy with ovarian preservation, premenopausal women report small, yet statistically significant, improvement in overall sexual function, which is not likely clinically significant.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.