Defining early health technology assessment: building consensus using Delphi technique.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Janneke P C Grutters, Janet Bouttell, Payam Abrishami, Sulafa Y M Ahmed, Amanda Cole, Dalia Dawoud, Carla Fernández-Barceló, Geert W J Frederix, Neil Hawkins, Jonathan Karnon, Sharon Leadbitter, Christopher McCabe, Jani Mueller, Samuel Owusu Achiaw, Andrew Partington, Laura Sampietro-Colom, Abril Seyahian, Rabia Sucu, Michelle Tew, Sasha van Katwyk, Yves Verboven, Yi Wang
{"title":"Defining early health technology assessment: building consensus using Delphi technique.","authors":"Janneke P C Grutters, Janet Bouttell, Payam Abrishami, Sulafa Y M Ahmed, Amanda Cole, Dalia Dawoud, Carla Fernández-Barceló, Geert W J Frederix, Neil Hawkins, Jonathan Karnon, Sharon Leadbitter, Christopher McCabe, Jani Mueller, Samuel Owusu Achiaw, Andrew Partington, Laura Sampietro-Colom, Abril Seyahian, Rabia Sucu, Michelle Tew, Sasha van Katwyk, Yves Verboven, Yi Wang","doi":"10.1017/S0266462325100123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although early health technology assessment (HTA) is increasingly being used to guide and inform decisions on product development, a consensus definition is currently lacking. A working group under the HTA International Society was established to develop a consensus-based definition of early HTA. The working group developed a definition using an iterative process that comprised five stages of work and included a two-round Delphi survey with 133 respondents in the first and 99 respondents in the second round of the survey, with various backgrounds and levels of expertise. Following this process, the working group reached the first consensus-based definition of early HTA, which is an HTA conducted to inform decisions about subsequent development, research, and/or investment by explicitly evaluating the potential value of a conceptual or actual health technology. In total, 86 (87 percent) of the 99 panelists who participated in the second round of the Delphi survey either strongly agreed or agreed with this definition. This consensus definition represents an important milestone in early HTA. It will enhance the uniformity of terminology, increasing the visibility of research and policy in this field. We also hope that it will act as a catalyst sparkling further research and developments in this discipline.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"e34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325100123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although early health technology assessment (HTA) is increasingly being used to guide and inform decisions on product development, a consensus definition is currently lacking. A working group under the HTA International Society was established to develop a consensus-based definition of early HTA. The working group developed a definition using an iterative process that comprised five stages of work and included a two-round Delphi survey with 133 respondents in the first and 99 respondents in the second round of the survey, with various backgrounds and levels of expertise. Following this process, the working group reached the first consensus-based definition of early HTA, which is an HTA conducted to inform decisions about subsequent development, research, and/or investment by explicitly evaluating the potential value of a conceptual or actual health technology. In total, 86 (87 percent) of the 99 panelists who participated in the second round of the Delphi survey either strongly agreed or agreed with this definition. This consensus definition represents an important milestone in early HTA. It will enhance the uniformity of terminology, increasing the visibility of research and policy in this field. We also hope that it will act as a catalyst sparkling further research and developments in this discipline.

定义早期卫生技术评估:利用德尔菲技术建立共识。
尽管早期卫生技术评估(HTA)越来越多地被用于指导和为产品开发决策提供信息,但目前缺乏共识定义。HTA国际协会成立了一个工作组,以制定基于协商一致意见的早期HTA定义。工作组使用一个迭代过程制定了一个定义,该过程包括五个阶段的工作,包括两轮德尔菲调查,第一轮调查有133名受访者,第二轮调查有99名受访者,他们具有不同的背景和专业水平。在这一过程之后,工作组达成了第一个基于共识的早期HTA定义,这是一种HTA,通过明确评估概念或实际卫生技术的潜在价值,为后续开发、研究和/或投资决策提供信息。参加第二轮德尔菲调查的99名小组成员中,总共有86人(87%)强烈同意或同意这一定义。这一共识定义代表了早期HTA的一个重要里程碑。它将加强术语的统一性,提高这一领域的研究和政策的可见度。我们也希望它将作为一个催化剂,在这一学科的进一步研究和发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信