Identification of Risk Factors for Long-Term Surgical Outcomes Following Laminoplasty for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nao Otomo, Narihito Nagoshi, Junichi Yamane, Hitoshi Kono, Azusa Miyamoto, Kazuki Takeda, Tatsuya Yamamoto, Reo Shibata, Soraya Nishimura, Yasuhiro Kamata, Kenshi Daimon, Toshiki Okubo, Yoshiomi Kobayashi, Takahito Iga, Satoshi Suzuki, Masahiro Ozaki, Morio Matsumoto, Masaya Nakamura, Kota Watanabe
{"title":"Identification of Risk Factors for Long-Term Surgical Outcomes Following Laminoplasty for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.","authors":"Nao Otomo, Narihito Nagoshi, Junichi Yamane, Hitoshi Kono, Azusa Miyamoto, Kazuki Takeda, Tatsuya Yamamoto, Reo Shibata, Soraya Nishimura, Yasuhiro Kamata, Kenshi Daimon, Toshiki Okubo, Yoshiomi Kobayashi, Takahito Iga, Satoshi Suzuki, Masahiro Ozaki, Morio Matsumoto, Masaya Nakamura, Kota Watanabe","doi":"10.1177/21925682251347507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective multi-institutional study.ObjectivesAlthough previous studies have evaluated the surgical outcomes of laminoplasty in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), the long-term results remain unclear. The purpose of this study is to assess outcomes more than 10 years post-surgery and identify to identify factors that affect the long-term prognosis.MethodsEighty-four OPLL patients with more than a minimum of 10-year follow-up after surgery were divided into a good group with more than 50% improvement of the recovery rate of the cervical Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and a poor group with less than 50% improvement. The demographic data and radiographic parameters of cervical spinal alignment were compared, and significant poor prognostic factors were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression.ResultsFour preoperative factors showed significant differences between 2 groups: the presence of type 2 diabetes (<i>P</i> = 0.012), the baseline JOA scores (<i>P</i> = 0.001), the narrowest segment in the cervical (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and the presence of T2-weighted high signal on MRI (<i>P</i> = 0.030). Logistic regression analysis identified 3 of 4 factors were significantly associated with postoperative poor outcomes: the presence of type 2 diabetes (<i>P</i> = 0.011), the baseline JOA scores (<i>P</i> = 0.022), and the presence of T2-weighted high signal on MRI (<i>P</i> = 0.035).ConclusionThis study identified three risk factors associated with poor long-term surgical outcomes following laminoplasty for cervical OPLL. These findings could be significant indicators for predicting long-term outcomes in cervical OPLL patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251347507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129939/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251347507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective multi-institutional study.ObjectivesAlthough previous studies have evaluated the surgical outcomes of laminoplasty in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), the long-term results remain unclear. The purpose of this study is to assess outcomes more than 10 years post-surgery and identify to identify factors that affect the long-term prognosis.MethodsEighty-four OPLL patients with more than a minimum of 10-year follow-up after surgery were divided into a good group with more than 50% improvement of the recovery rate of the cervical Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and a poor group with less than 50% improvement. The demographic data and radiographic parameters of cervical spinal alignment were compared, and significant poor prognostic factors were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression.ResultsFour preoperative factors showed significant differences between 2 groups: the presence of type 2 diabetes (P = 0.012), the baseline JOA scores (P = 0.001), the narrowest segment in the cervical (P < 0.001) and the presence of T2-weighted high signal on MRI (P = 0.030). Logistic regression analysis identified 3 of 4 factors were significantly associated with postoperative poor outcomes: the presence of type 2 diabetes (P = 0.011), the baseline JOA scores (P = 0.022), and the presence of T2-weighted high signal on MRI (P = 0.035).ConclusionThis study identified three risk factors associated with poor long-term surgical outcomes following laminoplasty for cervical OPLL. These findings could be significant indicators for predicting long-term outcomes in cervical OPLL patients.

颈椎后纵韧带骨化椎板成形术后长期手术结果的危险因素鉴定。
研究设计:回顾性多机构研究。虽然之前的研究已经评估了颈椎后纵韧带骨化(OPLL)患者椎板成形术的手术结果,但长期结果仍不清楚。本研究的目的是评估术后10年以上的预后,并确定影响长期预后的因素。方法将84例术后随访时间≥10年的OPLL患者分为改善50%以上的颈椎日本骨科协会(JOA)评分优良组和改善50%以下的不良组。比较两组患者的人口学资料和颈椎线的影像学参数,并通过多因素logistic回归评估显著的不良预后因素。结果两组患者术前是否存在2型糖尿病(P = 0.012)、基线JOA评分(P = 0.001)、宫颈最窄段(P < 0.001)、MRI是否存在t2加权高信号(P = 0.030)等4个因素差异均有统计学意义。Logistic回归分析发现,4个因素中有3个与术后不良预后显著相关:2型糖尿病(P = 0.011)、基线JOA评分(P = 0.022)和MRI上出现t2加权高信号(P = 0.035)。结论:本研究确定了颈椎椎板成形术治疗后长期手术效果差的三个危险因素。这些发现可能是预测颈椎OPLL患者长期预后的重要指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信