Differences in Characteristics of Trauma Between General Trauma and Suicidal Trauma-Trauma Mechanism, Injury Site, and Severity: A Single-Center Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Emergency Medicine International Pub Date : 2025-05-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/emmi/6058288
Ji Young Hyun, Yae Jun Son, SuHyun Kim, Keum Seok Bae, Jae Sik Chung, Il Hwan Park, Young Un Choi
{"title":"Differences in Characteristics of Trauma Between General Trauma and Suicidal Trauma-Trauma Mechanism, Injury Site, and Severity: A Single-Center Study.","authors":"Ji Young Hyun, Yae Jun Son, SuHyun Kim, Keum Seok Bae, Jae Sik Chung, Il Hwan Park, Young Un Choi","doi":"10.1155/emmi/6058288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Among patients with trauma, those with self-harm exhibit different characteristics than those who experience general accidents. Unstable vital signs following a severe injury often limit accurate imaging and injury assessment during initial treatment, rendering decision-making challenging for definitive care. Identifying correlations between damage area and severity can improve predictions and treatment decisions. We identify differences in characteristics of trauma between patients who experienced general accidents and those who attempted suicide. <b>Methods:</b> This study investigates differences in trauma characteristics between accidental and self-harm injuries in a single-center cohort of 10,180 patients (2015-2023). We analyzed age, sex, trauma mechanism, intention of suicide, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score, injury severity score (ISS), and height for falls. We divided intentionality into accident and self-harm and analyzed and compared their characteristics. <b>Results:</b> The self-harm group was significantly younger (mean: 10 years younger, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and had a higher proportion of falls (41.0%) and stab injuries (48.9%). Self-harm falls were more severe, with a mean fall height of 10.8m (vs. 4.14m in the accidental group, <i>p</i> < 0.001), resulting in a higher ISS (18.6 vs. 15.5, <i>p</i> < 0.05). In the self-harm group, fall attempts were common among teenagers and those in their 20s, while knife injuries were common in individuals in their 40s and 50s. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study confirmed the relationship between the injury mechanism and AIS in patients with trauma. The damaged area and degree of damage differed between the self-harm and accident groups, even with the same mechanism. Understanding these patterns can enhance initial ER assessments and reduce missed injuries in high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11528,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"6058288"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/emmi/6058288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Among patients with trauma, those with self-harm exhibit different characteristics than those who experience general accidents. Unstable vital signs following a severe injury often limit accurate imaging and injury assessment during initial treatment, rendering decision-making challenging for definitive care. Identifying correlations between damage area and severity can improve predictions and treatment decisions. We identify differences in characteristics of trauma between patients who experienced general accidents and those who attempted suicide. Methods: This study investigates differences in trauma characteristics between accidental and self-harm injuries in a single-center cohort of 10,180 patients (2015-2023). We analyzed age, sex, trauma mechanism, intention of suicide, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score, injury severity score (ISS), and height for falls. We divided intentionality into accident and self-harm and analyzed and compared their characteristics. Results: The self-harm group was significantly younger (mean: 10 years younger, p < 0.05) and had a higher proportion of falls (41.0%) and stab injuries (48.9%). Self-harm falls were more severe, with a mean fall height of 10.8m (vs. 4.14m in the accidental group, p < 0.001), resulting in a higher ISS (18.6 vs. 15.5, p < 0.05). In the self-harm group, fall attempts were common among teenagers and those in their 20s, while knife injuries were common in individuals in their 40s and 50s. Conclusion: This study confirmed the relationship between the injury mechanism and AIS in patients with trauma. The damaged area and degree of damage differed between the self-harm and accident groups, even with the same mechanism. Understanding these patterns can enhance initial ER assessments and reduce missed injuries in high-risk patients.

普通创伤和自杀性创伤特征的差异——创伤机制、损伤部位和严重程度:一项单中心研究。
背景:在创伤患者中,自残患者表现出与一般事故患者不同的特征。严重损伤后不稳定的生命体征通常限制了初始治疗期间准确的成像和损伤评估,使最终护理的决策具有挑战性。确定损伤区域和严重程度之间的相关性可以改善预测和治疗决策。我们确定了经历过一般事故的患者和企图自杀的患者之间创伤特征的差异。方法:研究2015-2023年10180例单中心队列患者意外伤害与自残伤害的创伤特征差异。我们分析了年龄、性别、创伤机制、自杀意图、简易伤害量表(AIS)评分、伤害严重程度评分(ISS)和跌倒的身高。我们将故意分为意外伤害和自残,并对其特征进行了分析和比较。结果:自残组明显年轻化(平均年轻10岁,p < 0.05),摔伤发生率(41.0%)和刺伤发生率(48.9%)较高。自残跌倒更严重,平均跌倒高度为10.8m(意外组为4.14m, p < 0.001),导致ISS更高(18.6比15.5,p < 0.05)。在自残组中,跌倒尝试在青少年和20多岁的人中很常见,而刀伤在40多岁和50多岁的人中很常见。结论:本研究证实了创伤患者损伤机制与AIS之间的关系。自残组和事故组的损伤面积和损伤程度不同,即使机制相同。了解这些模式可以提高初步急诊评估,减少高危患者的漏诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine International
Emergency Medicine International EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for doctors, nurses, paramedics and ambulance staff. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to prehospital care, disaster preparedness and response, acute medical and paediatric emergencies, critical care, sports medicine, wound care, and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信