Community engagement and chronic viral hepatitis public health interventions: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and complementary crowdsourcing open call.

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2025-05-02 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103234
Yifan Li, Eneyi Kpokiri, Dalia Elasi, Rongrong Sheng, Keying Wang, Hayley Conyers, Ye Zhang, Danjuma K Adda, Philippa C Matthews, Thomas Fitzpatrick, Joseph D Tucker, Dan Wu
{"title":"Community engagement and chronic viral hepatitis public health interventions: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and complementary crowdsourcing open call.","authors":"Yifan Li, Eneyi Kpokiri, Dalia Elasi, Rongrong Sheng, Keying Wang, Hayley Conyers, Ye Zhang, Danjuma K Adda, Philippa C Matthews, Thomas Fitzpatrick, Joseph D Tucker, Dan Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic viral hepatitis causes a high burden of morbidity and mortality, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). While community engagement, which involves stakeholders in addressing health-related issues, has shown promise to enhance hepatitis outcomes, evidence on its impact remains limited. To summarize the current state of knowledge on this topic we performed a systematic review and a crowdsourcing open call.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A parallel mixed-methods approach was used in this study. The systematic review included publications that evaluated a community-engaged intervention, reported chronic viral hepatitis outcomes, included a comparator group, and were published in English up to 12 March 2025. A random-effects model was used to pool the overall effect of the community-engaged interventions on hepatitis outcomes. To ensure innovative ideas from LMICs were included, we organized a complementary crowdsourcing open call using the WHO/TDR practical guide. Thematic analysis identified key themes in the crowdsourced submissions.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>35 studies were included in the systematic review, and 28 crowdsourced submissions were analyzed. In both the systematic review and open call, community-engaged interventions included peer-based interventions, community health workers, interactive educational programs, and patient advocacy. The meta-analysis, predominantly of studies from high-income countries, found community-engaged interventions significantly improved HBV vaccine completion (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.15-2.19; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 88.10%), HBV/HCV test uptake (RR 2.33, 95% CI 1.78-3.06; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 99.10%), HBV and HCV linkage to chronic viral hepatitis care (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.46-2.64; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 96.20%), HBV/HCV treatment adherence (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.27; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%), and HCV sustained virologic response (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.23-1.83; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 93.90%). Open call submissions, largely from LMICs, highlighted community-led interventions where patients led community-based organizations to advocate for improved access to hepatitis care.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Findings underscored the importance of community engagement in chronic viral hepatitis service delivery across the care continuum. Implementing community-engaged interventions can enhance chronic viral hepatitis elimination efforts.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Natural Science Foundation of China.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"83 ","pages":"103234"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12123346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103234","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic viral hepatitis causes a high burden of morbidity and mortality, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). While community engagement, which involves stakeholders in addressing health-related issues, has shown promise to enhance hepatitis outcomes, evidence on its impact remains limited. To summarize the current state of knowledge on this topic we performed a systematic review and a crowdsourcing open call.

Methods: A parallel mixed-methods approach was used in this study. The systematic review included publications that evaluated a community-engaged intervention, reported chronic viral hepatitis outcomes, included a comparator group, and were published in English up to 12 March 2025. A random-effects model was used to pool the overall effect of the community-engaged interventions on hepatitis outcomes. To ensure innovative ideas from LMICs were included, we organized a complementary crowdsourcing open call using the WHO/TDR practical guide. Thematic analysis identified key themes in the crowdsourced submissions.

Findings: 35 studies were included in the systematic review, and 28 crowdsourced submissions were analyzed. In both the systematic review and open call, community-engaged interventions included peer-based interventions, community health workers, interactive educational programs, and patient advocacy. The meta-analysis, predominantly of studies from high-income countries, found community-engaged interventions significantly improved HBV vaccine completion (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.15-2.19; I 2 = 88.10%), HBV/HCV test uptake (RR 2.33, 95% CI 1.78-3.06; I 2 = 99.10%), HBV and HCV linkage to chronic viral hepatitis care (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.46-2.64; I 2 = 96.20%), HBV/HCV treatment adherence (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.27; I 2 = 0%), and HCV sustained virologic response (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.23-1.83; I 2 = 93.90%). Open call submissions, largely from LMICs, highlighted community-led interventions where patients led community-based organizations to advocate for improved access to hepatitis care.

Interpretation: Findings underscored the importance of community engagement in chronic viral hepatitis service delivery across the care continuum. Implementing community-engaged interventions can enhance chronic viral hepatitis elimination efforts.

Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

社区参与和慢性病毒性肝炎公共卫生干预:系统回顾、荟萃分析和互补的众包公开呼吁。
背景:慢性病毒性肝炎引起高发病率和死亡率负担,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。虽然让利益攸关方参与解决卫生相关问题的社区参与有望改善肝炎的结局,但有关其影响的证据仍然有限。为了总结关于这一主题的知识现状,我们进行了系统回顾和众包公开呼吁。方法:本研究采用并行混合方法。该系统评价纳入了评估社区参与干预措施的出版物,报告了慢性病毒性肝炎的结局,包括一个比较组,并在2025年3月12日之前以英文发表。随机效应模型用于汇总社区参与干预对肝炎结局的总体影响。为确保纳入低收入和中等收入国家的创新想法,我们利用世卫组织/TDR实践指南组织了一次补充性的众包公开呼吁。专题分析确定了众包提交作品中的关键主题。结果:系统综述纳入35项研究,分析了28项众包提交。在系统评价和公开征集中,社区参与的干预措施包括基于同伴的干预措施、社区卫生工作者、互动教育计划和患者倡导。主要来自高收入国家的荟萃分析发现,社区参与的干预措施显著提高了HBV疫苗的完成率(RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.15-2.19;I 2 = 88.10%), HBV/HCV检测摄取(RR 2.33, 95% CI 1.78-3.06;I 2 = 99.10%), HBV和HCV与慢性病毒性肝炎护理相关(RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.46-2.64;I 2 = 96.20%), HBV/HCV治疗依从性(RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.27;I 2 = 0%)和HCV持续病毒学应答(RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.23-1.83;i2 = 93.90%)。公开征集意见书主要来自中低收入国家,强调了由患者领导社区组织倡导改善肝炎护理的社区主导干预措施。解释:研究结果强调了社区参与在整个护理连续体中提供慢性病毒性肝炎服务的重要性。实施社区参与的干预措施可加强消除慢性病毒性肝炎的工作。资助项目:国家自然科学基金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信