Propensity Score Matching: A Step-by-Step Guide to Coding in R and Application in Observational Research Studies.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
American Surgeon Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-02 DOI:10.1177/00031348251331293
Melissa A Kendall, Tyler Zander, Rachel L Wolansky, Lucas Teixeira, Paul C Kuo
{"title":"Propensity Score Matching: A Step-by-Step Guide to Coding in R and Application in Observational Research Studies.","authors":"Melissa A Kendall, Tyler Zander, Rachel L Wolansky, Lucas Teixeira, Paul C Kuo","doi":"10.1177/00031348251331293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although randomized controlled trials are the gold standard approach to identify relationships between an intervention and outcomes, observational studies remain invaluable. They allow for increased study power and efficiency, decreased cost, and demonstrate unique relationships that would be otherwise unfeasible or unethical. However, they are inherently biased by their non-randomized nature. Propensity score matching (PSM) combats this. We outline a step-by-step guide, from PICO question development, database and data processing/analytics software selection, and PSM coding techniques. We demonstrate this through an example evaluating cholecystectomy timing and outcomes in pregnant patients with cholecystitis. We discuss matching methods selected based on data set characteristics. Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT) is applied to evaluate the intervention effect on patients who received the intervention. Balance between the intervention and comparison groups pre- and post-PSM is demonstrated mathematically by calculating standard mean differences and visually with Love Plots. Finally, treatment effect post-PSM is evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"1949-1955"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251331293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although randomized controlled trials are the gold standard approach to identify relationships between an intervention and outcomes, observational studies remain invaluable. They allow for increased study power and efficiency, decreased cost, and demonstrate unique relationships that would be otherwise unfeasible or unethical. However, they are inherently biased by their non-randomized nature. Propensity score matching (PSM) combats this. We outline a step-by-step guide, from PICO question development, database and data processing/analytics software selection, and PSM coding techniques. We demonstrate this through an example evaluating cholecystectomy timing and outcomes in pregnant patients with cholecystitis. We discuss matching methods selected based on data set characteristics. Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT) is applied to evaluate the intervention effect on patients who received the intervention. Balance between the intervention and comparison groups pre- and post-PSM is demonstrated mathematically by calculating standard mean differences and visually with Love Plots. Finally, treatment effect post-PSM is evaluated.

倾向得分匹配:一步一步的指南在R编码和应用观察研究。
虽然随机对照试验是确定干预措施与结果之间关系的金标准方法,但观察性研究仍然是非常宝贵的。它们可以提高研究能力和效率,降低成本,并展示出独特的关系,否则这些关系是不可行的或不道德的。然而,由于它们的非随机性质,它们本身就存在偏见。倾向得分匹配(PSM)可以解决这个问题。我们概述了一步一步的指南,从PICO问题开发,数据库和数据处理/分析软件选择,以及PSM编码技术。我们通过一个评估胆囊炎孕妇胆囊切除术时机和结果的例子来证明这一点。我们讨论了基于数据集特征选择的匹配方法。对被治疗者的平均治疗效果(ATT)用于评估接受干预的患者的干预效果。干预组和对照组在psm前后之间的平衡通过计算标准均值差异和视觉爱情图来证明。最后对psm后的治疗效果进行评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信