Sediment Maps for the Continental Shelf of the US Gulf of America and South Atlantic Bight Using Compositional Kriging

IF 3.3 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Iliana Chollett, Christopher Gardner, Larry Perruso, John F. Walter III
{"title":"Sediment Maps for the Continental Shelf of the US Gulf of America and South Atlantic Bight Using Compositional Kriging","authors":"Iliana Chollett,&nbsp;Christopher Gardner,&nbsp;Larry Perruso,&nbsp;John F. Walter III","doi":"10.1002/gdj3.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We produced maps of sediment fractions for the US Gulf of America (formerly Gulf of Mexico) and South Atlantic Bight at 1 km<sup>2</sup> spatial resolution using compositional kriging. Quantitative tools were used to identify the optimal pixel size of the output map, which was produced using compositional kriging of log-ratio transformed variables. Input data were extracted from the databases usSEABED and dbSEABED, and were in the form of 167,854 sediment samples with the percentage composition of sand, mud and gravel. Sediments for the Gulf of America were mostly muddy (35% median, while sand and gravel took 20% and 0%) and for the South Atlantic Bight were mostly sandy (86%, with sand and gravel fractions having 0% of the median). Gravel was always the least common fraction. Anisotropy (variable spatial continuity in different directions) was negligible in the Gulf of America but relevant in the South Atlantic Bight. Sediment data were uncorrelated with bathymetry in both regions. Spatial resolution for the output maps was identified as 1 km<sup>2</sup> based on quantitative analyses. Interpolated maps were computed using compositional kriging on log-ratio transformed variables. The standard deviation of the estimator based on the kriging variance was 0.12 for gravel, 0.18 for sand and 0.06 for mud in the Gulf and 0.14 for gravel, 0.17 for sand and 0.001 for mud in the Atlantic. Compositional kriging is the method that provides the best accuracy in terms of mean absolute error. Interpolation of raw variables provides the best accuracy according to root mean square error, but handling of fractions individually is statistically inappropriate for this type of data.</p>","PeriodicalId":54351,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience Data Journal","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gdj3.70014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience Data Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gdj3.70014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We produced maps of sediment fractions for the US Gulf of America (formerly Gulf of Mexico) and South Atlantic Bight at 1 km2 spatial resolution using compositional kriging. Quantitative tools were used to identify the optimal pixel size of the output map, which was produced using compositional kriging of log-ratio transformed variables. Input data were extracted from the databases usSEABED and dbSEABED, and were in the form of 167,854 sediment samples with the percentage composition of sand, mud and gravel. Sediments for the Gulf of America were mostly muddy (35% median, while sand and gravel took 20% and 0%) and for the South Atlantic Bight were mostly sandy (86%, with sand and gravel fractions having 0% of the median). Gravel was always the least common fraction. Anisotropy (variable spatial continuity in different directions) was negligible in the Gulf of America but relevant in the South Atlantic Bight. Sediment data were uncorrelated with bathymetry in both regions. Spatial resolution for the output maps was identified as 1 km2 based on quantitative analyses. Interpolated maps were computed using compositional kriging on log-ratio transformed variables. The standard deviation of the estimator based on the kriging variance was 0.12 for gravel, 0.18 for sand and 0.06 for mud in the Gulf and 0.14 for gravel, 0.17 for sand and 0.001 for mud in the Atlantic. Compositional kriging is the method that provides the best accuracy in terms of mean absolute error. Interpolation of raw variables provides the best accuracy according to root mean square error, but handling of fractions individually is statistically inappropriate for this type of data.

Abstract Image

美国墨西哥湾和南大西洋湾大陆架沉积物图的成分克里格法
我们使用成分克里格法以1平方公里的空间分辨率绘制了美国墨西哥湾(以前的墨西哥湾)和南大西洋湾的沉积物组分图。使用定量工具确定输出图的最佳像素大小,输出图使用对数比变换变量的组成克里格法生成。输入数据从usSEABED和dbSEABED数据库中提取,以167,854个沉积物样品的形式,其中包含砂、泥和砾石的百分比组成。美国海湾的沉积物主要是泥质(中值35%,砂砾占20%和0%),南大西洋海湾的沉积物主要是砂质(86%,砂砾占中值的0%)。砾石总是最不常见的部分。各向异性(不同方向的可变空间连续性)在美国海湾可以忽略不计,但在南大西洋湾则相关。这两个地区的沉积物数据与水深测量不相关。根据定量分析,输出地图的空间分辨率确定为1 km2。利用对数比变换变量的组合克里格法计算插值映射。在海湾地区,基于克里格方差的估计量的标准差为砾石0.12,砂0.18,泥浆0.06;在大西洋地区,砾石0.14,砂0.17,泥浆0.001。成分克里金法是在平均绝对误差方面提供最佳精度的方法。原始变量的插值根据均方根误差提供了最好的精度,但是单独处理分数在统计上不适合这种类型的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoscience Data Journal
Geoscience Data Journal GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Geoscience Data Journal provides an Open Access platform where scientific data can be formally published, in a way that includes scientific peer-review. Thus the dataset creator attains full credit for their efforts, while also improving the scientific record, providing version control for the community and allowing major datasets to be fully described, cited and discovered. An online-only journal, GDJ publishes short data papers cross-linked to – and citing – datasets that have been deposited in approved data centres and awarded DOIs. The journal will also accept articles on data services, and articles which support and inform data publishing best practices. Data is at the heart of science and scientific endeavour. The curation of data and the science associated with it is as important as ever in our understanding of the changing earth system and thereby enabling us to make future predictions. Geoscience Data Journal is working with recognised Data Centres across the globe to develop the future strategy for data publication, the recognition of the value of data and the communication and exploitation of data to the wider science and stakeholder communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信