Iliana Chollett, Christopher Gardner, Larry Perruso, John F. Walter III
{"title":"Sediment Maps for the Continental Shelf of the US Gulf of America and South Atlantic Bight Using Compositional Kriging","authors":"Iliana Chollett, Christopher Gardner, Larry Perruso, John F. Walter III","doi":"10.1002/gdj3.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We produced maps of sediment fractions for the US Gulf of America (formerly Gulf of Mexico) and South Atlantic Bight at 1 km<sup>2</sup> spatial resolution using compositional kriging. Quantitative tools were used to identify the optimal pixel size of the output map, which was produced using compositional kriging of log-ratio transformed variables. Input data were extracted from the databases usSEABED and dbSEABED, and were in the form of 167,854 sediment samples with the percentage composition of sand, mud and gravel. Sediments for the Gulf of America were mostly muddy (35% median, while sand and gravel took 20% and 0%) and for the South Atlantic Bight were mostly sandy (86%, with sand and gravel fractions having 0% of the median). Gravel was always the least common fraction. Anisotropy (variable spatial continuity in different directions) was negligible in the Gulf of America but relevant in the South Atlantic Bight. Sediment data were uncorrelated with bathymetry in both regions. Spatial resolution for the output maps was identified as 1 km<sup>2</sup> based on quantitative analyses. Interpolated maps were computed using compositional kriging on log-ratio transformed variables. The standard deviation of the estimator based on the kriging variance was 0.12 for gravel, 0.18 for sand and 0.06 for mud in the Gulf and 0.14 for gravel, 0.17 for sand and 0.001 for mud in the Atlantic. Compositional kriging is the method that provides the best accuracy in terms of mean absolute error. Interpolation of raw variables provides the best accuracy according to root mean square error, but handling of fractions individually is statistically inappropriate for this type of data.</p>","PeriodicalId":54351,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience Data Journal","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gdj3.70014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience Data Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gdj3.70014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We produced maps of sediment fractions for the US Gulf of America (formerly Gulf of Mexico) and South Atlantic Bight at 1 km2 spatial resolution using compositional kriging. Quantitative tools were used to identify the optimal pixel size of the output map, which was produced using compositional kriging of log-ratio transformed variables. Input data were extracted from the databases usSEABED and dbSEABED, and were in the form of 167,854 sediment samples with the percentage composition of sand, mud and gravel. Sediments for the Gulf of America were mostly muddy (35% median, while sand and gravel took 20% and 0%) and for the South Atlantic Bight were mostly sandy (86%, with sand and gravel fractions having 0% of the median). Gravel was always the least common fraction. Anisotropy (variable spatial continuity in different directions) was negligible in the Gulf of America but relevant in the South Atlantic Bight. Sediment data were uncorrelated with bathymetry in both regions. Spatial resolution for the output maps was identified as 1 km2 based on quantitative analyses. Interpolated maps were computed using compositional kriging on log-ratio transformed variables. The standard deviation of the estimator based on the kriging variance was 0.12 for gravel, 0.18 for sand and 0.06 for mud in the Gulf and 0.14 for gravel, 0.17 for sand and 0.001 for mud in the Atlantic. Compositional kriging is the method that provides the best accuracy in terms of mean absolute error. Interpolation of raw variables provides the best accuracy according to root mean square error, but handling of fractions individually is statistically inappropriate for this type of data.
Geoscience Data JournalGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍:
Geoscience Data Journal provides an Open Access platform where scientific data can be formally published, in a way that includes scientific peer-review. Thus the dataset creator attains full credit for their efforts, while also improving the scientific record, providing version control for the community and allowing major datasets to be fully described, cited and discovered.
An online-only journal, GDJ publishes short data papers cross-linked to – and citing – datasets that have been deposited in approved data centres and awarded DOIs. The journal will also accept articles on data services, and articles which support and inform data publishing best practices.
Data is at the heart of science and scientific endeavour. The curation of data and the science associated with it is as important as ever in our understanding of the changing earth system and thereby enabling us to make future predictions. Geoscience Data Journal is working with recognised Data Centres across the globe to develop the future strategy for data publication, the recognition of the value of data and the communication and exploitation of data to the wider science and stakeholder communities.