Temporal trends and racial disparities in atrial fibrillation ablation: A 5-year study

IF 1.7 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Daniel Antwi-Amoabeng MD, MSc, Bryce D. Beutler MD, Vijay Neelam MD, T. David Gbadebo MD
{"title":"Temporal trends and racial disparities in atrial fibrillation ablation: A 5-year study","authors":"Daniel Antwi-Amoabeng MD, MSc,&nbsp;Bryce D. Beutler MD,&nbsp;Vijay Neelam MD,&nbsp;T. David Gbadebo MD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Racial disparities exist in access to cardiovascular interventions, including atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. This study evaluates trends and disparities among racial and ethnic groups in the United States over a five-year period.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2020. Hospitalized AF patients undergoing ablation were identified using ICD-10 codes. Trends in ablation were assessed across racial groups, and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the predictors of cardiac ablation utilization. Time-to-ablation disparities were further analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>White patients had the highest ablation rates (1.08%) followed by Native Americans (1.03%), while Black patients had the lowest ablation rates (0.9%). A significant 52.6% increase in ablation utilization was observed over the study period (<i>p</i> &lt; .001), yet racial disparities remained unchanged. Black (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.61, 95% CI: 0.56–0.64) and Hispanic (aOR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77–0.88) patients had significantly lower odds of undergoing AF ablation compared to White patients. Black patients with higher comorbid disease burden, severe obesity, and protein-calorie malnutrition were less likely to have AF ablation and experienced significant wait times (additional 1.3 days) before receiving ablation in time-to-procedure analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>While the overall rate of AF ablation has increased over time, persistent racial disparities in procedure utilization remain. Hospital location and bed size, socioeconomic factors, and comorbid medical conditions contribute to these disparities, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to close the gap in AF care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70104","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Racial disparities exist in access to cardiovascular interventions, including atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. This study evaluates trends and disparities among racial and ethnic groups in the United States over a five-year period.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2020. Hospitalized AF patients undergoing ablation were identified using ICD-10 codes. Trends in ablation were assessed across racial groups, and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the predictors of cardiac ablation utilization. Time-to-ablation disparities were further analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results

White patients had the highest ablation rates (1.08%) followed by Native Americans (1.03%), while Black patients had the lowest ablation rates (0.9%). A significant 52.6% increase in ablation utilization was observed over the study period (p < .001), yet racial disparities remained unchanged. Black (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.61, 95% CI: 0.56–0.64) and Hispanic (aOR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77–0.88) patients had significantly lower odds of undergoing AF ablation compared to White patients. Black patients with higher comorbid disease burden, severe obesity, and protein-calorie malnutrition were less likely to have AF ablation and experienced significant wait times (additional 1.3 days) before receiving ablation in time-to-procedure analysis.

Conclusions

While the overall rate of AF ablation has increased over time, persistent racial disparities in procedure utilization remain. Hospital location and bed size, socioeconomic factors, and comorbid medical conditions contribute to these disparities, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to close the gap in AF care.

Abstract Image

心房颤动消融的时间趋势和种族差异:一项为期5年的研究
背景在获得心血管干预措施,包括房颤(AF)消融术方面存在种族差异。这项研究评估了五年来美国种族和族裔群体之间的趋势和差异。方法采用2016 - 2020年全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库进行横断面分析。使用ICD-10代码识别住院房颤患者。研究人员评估了不同种族人群的消融术趋势,并使用多变量logistic回归模型来评估心脏消融术使用的预测因素。使用Cox比例风险回归进一步分析消融时间差异。结果白人患者消融率最高(1.08%),印第安人次之(1.03%),黑人患者消融率最低(0.9%)。在研究期间,观察到消融利用率显著增加52.6% (p < .001),但种族差异保持不变。黑人(校正优势比(aOR) 0.61, 95% CI: 0.56-0.64)和西班牙裔(aOR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77-0.88)患者接受房颤消融的几率明显低于白人患者。伴有较高合并症负担、严重肥胖和蛋白质-卡路里营养不良的黑人患者接受房颤消融的可能性较小,并且在接受消融前等待时间较长(额外1.3天)。结论:虽然心房颤动消融的总体发生率随着时间的推移而增加,但在手术应用方面仍然存在持续的种族差异。医院位置和床位大小、社会经济因素和合并症导致了这些差异,强调需要有针对性的干预措施来缩小房颤护理的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信