Integrated Geophysical Search for 19th-Century Underground Tanks in Krakow (Poland): Analysis of 2D, 2.5D and 3D ERT Surveys

IF 2.1 3区 地球科学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Bernadetta Pasierb, Wiesław Nawrocki
{"title":"Integrated Geophysical Search for 19th-Century Underground Tanks in Krakow (Poland): Analysis of 2D, 2.5D and 3D ERT Surveys","authors":"Bernadetta Pasierb,&nbsp;Wiesław Nawrocki","doi":"10.1002/arp.1974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The paper presents the results of a noninvasive geophysical search for 19th-century underground tanks located in the former Austrian imperial barracks complex of Archduke Rudolf in Krakow (Poland). The location of the tanks was necessary to assess their condition for safety reasons. Complementary geophysical methods in terms of field conditions and data acquisition, that is, magnetometry, ground penetrating radar (GPR) and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), were used to locate the tanks. Interdisciplinary surveys made it possible to identify the subsurface structure, locate sewage settling tanks and verify archival documentation. The paper presents the problems that arise in imaging underground structures using applied geophysical methods. The aim of the study was also to assess the effectiveness of these methods in subsurface identification, including 2D, 2.5D and 3D ERT surveys. The applied sequence of measurements (magnetometric, GPR and ERT) proved to be correct and the most effective. It allowed for narrowing down the research area. Magnetometric measurements allowed for the location of iron elements related to the construction of the tanks. GPR measurements determined their range. The ERT results showed that 2D and 2.5D surveys conducted in the parallel-line arrangement are as effective in determining the location of an anomalous object as the 3D orthogonal-line arrangement. The 3D method enabled the identification of additional anomalies not detected by the 2.5D method. From the point of view of the practicality of both techniques, the 2.5D method turned out to be better than the 3D method, due to the simplicity of the fieldwork, lower spatial and hardware requirements, a greater depth range and lower complexity of data acquisition and processing.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55490,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Prospection","volume":"32 2","pages":"483-502"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Prospection","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arp.1974","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper presents the results of a noninvasive geophysical search for 19th-century underground tanks located in the former Austrian imperial barracks complex of Archduke Rudolf in Krakow (Poland). The location of the tanks was necessary to assess their condition for safety reasons. Complementary geophysical methods in terms of field conditions and data acquisition, that is, magnetometry, ground penetrating radar (GPR) and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), were used to locate the tanks. Interdisciplinary surveys made it possible to identify the subsurface structure, locate sewage settling tanks and verify archival documentation. The paper presents the problems that arise in imaging underground structures using applied geophysical methods. The aim of the study was also to assess the effectiveness of these methods in subsurface identification, including 2D, 2.5D and 3D ERT surveys. The applied sequence of measurements (magnetometric, GPR and ERT) proved to be correct and the most effective. It allowed for narrowing down the research area. Magnetometric measurements allowed for the location of iron elements related to the construction of the tanks. GPR measurements determined their range. The ERT results showed that 2D and 2.5D surveys conducted in the parallel-line arrangement are as effective in determining the location of an anomalous object as the 3D orthogonal-line arrangement. The 3D method enabled the identification of additional anomalies not detected by the 2.5D method. From the point of view of the practicality of both techniques, the 2.5D method turned out to be better than the 3D method, due to the simplicity of the fieldwork, lower spatial and hardware requirements, a greater depth range and lower complexity of data acquisition and processing.

波兰克拉科夫19世纪地下储罐的综合地球物理搜索:2D、2.5D和3D ERT调查分析
本文介绍了位于克拉科夫(波兰)鲁道夫大公的前奥地利帝国军营综合体的19世纪地下坦克的非侵入性地球物理搜索结果。出于安全原因,有必要对储罐的位置进行评估。根据现场条件和数据采集,采用了互补的地球物理方法,即磁强计、探地雷达(GPR)和电阻率层析成像(ERT)来定位储罐。跨学科调查使得确定地下结构、定位污水沉淀池和核实档案文件成为可能。本文介绍了应用地球物理方法对地下构造进行成像时出现的问题。该研究的目的还包括评估这些方法在地下识别中的有效性,包括2D、2.5D和3D ERT调查。应用的测量顺序(磁强计、探地雷达和ERT)证明是正确和最有效的。它可以缩小研究范围。磁强计测量可以确定与储罐结构有关的铁元素的位置。探地雷达测量确定了它们的射程。ERT结果表明,以平行线排列进行的2D和2.5D测量与三维正交线排列一样有效地确定异常物体的位置。3D方法能够识别2.5D方法无法检测到的其他异常。从两种技术的实用性来看,2.5D方法由于实地工作简单,对空间和硬件的要求更低,深度范围更大,数据采集和处理的复杂性更低,因此优于3D方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archaeological Prospection
Archaeological Prospection 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the Journal will be international, covering urban, rural and marine environments and the full range of underlying geology. The Journal will contain articles relating to the use of a wide range of propecting techniques, including remote sensing (airborne and satellite), geophysical (e.g. resistivity, magnetometry) and geochemical (e.g. organic markers, soil phosphate). Reports and field evaluations of new techniques will be welcomed. Contributions will be encouraged on the application of relevant software, including G.I.S. analysis, to the data derived from prospection techniques and cartographic analysis of early maps. Reports on integrated site evaluations and follow-up site investigations will be particularly encouraged. The Journal will welcome contributions, in the form of short (field) reports, on the application of prospection techniques in support of comprehensive land-use studies. The Journal will, as appropriate, contain book reviews, conference and meeting reviews, and software evaluation. All papers will be subjected to peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信