Bronze Age wool textile and fur items from northern Eurasia: Identification of the fiber origin and differentiation between domestic animal species

IF 0.9 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
N.I. Shishlina , O.F. Chernova
{"title":"Bronze Age wool textile and fur items from northern Eurasia: Identification of the fiber origin and differentiation between domestic animal species","authors":"N.I. Shishlina ,&nbsp;O.F. Chernova","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2025.100635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The preserved Bronze Age wool textile samples obtained from various sites in the southern Caucasus and northern Eurasia were used to carry out technological analysis of the fibers in order to identify animal fiber origin. The aim of our study was to compare the dataset of the Bronze Age archaeological wool fibers and the reference dataset of mammalian species based on such characteristics as the structure of the wool fibers and hairs. The two identified types of raw material for woolen cloths in the southern Caucasus, the steppe, forest-steppe and forest belts of eastern Europe, southern Siberia and Kazakhstan demonstrate that the use of secondary products such as goat underwool and sheep wool is likely to have been linked to changes in animal husbandry in some local societies and appearance of various specialized types of local animal husbandry, including deliberate keeping of sheep for production of meat and milk and gradual transition towards wool production that was necessary to meet the needs of prehistoric society in innovation raw materials and novel cloths. Horse leather/hairs were also used to make items, presumably, clothes. In all likelihood, during the transition from the third to the second millennia BCE some northern Eurasia regions began to adopt specialized goat and sheep husbandry for wool, such specialization is reflected in the age composition of the sheep and goat flocks based on the analysis of archaeological assemblages, for example, an assemblage from a settlement in the southern Urals attributed to the Srubnaya (Timber-Grave) culture which dates to the first half of the second millennium BCE. The analysis of our dataset did not identify hairs and fur of other animals (domestic dog, camel, ground-squirrel, hair, beaver, etc.), though bones of these animals have been found in archaeological contexts in various areas of the study region. This analysis has revealed a special role that goat and sheep wool played in the production of novel wool cloths in northern Eurasia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100635"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Research in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352226725000455","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The preserved Bronze Age wool textile samples obtained from various sites in the southern Caucasus and northern Eurasia were used to carry out technological analysis of the fibers in order to identify animal fiber origin. The aim of our study was to compare the dataset of the Bronze Age archaeological wool fibers and the reference dataset of mammalian species based on such characteristics as the structure of the wool fibers and hairs. The two identified types of raw material for woolen cloths in the southern Caucasus, the steppe, forest-steppe and forest belts of eastern Europe, southern Siberia and Kazakhstan demonstrate that the use of secondary products such as goat underwool and sheep wool is likely to have been linked to changes in animal husbandry in some local societies and appearance of various specialized types of local animal husbandry, including deliberate keeping of sheep for production of meat and milk and gradual transition towards wool production that was necessary to meet the needs of prehistoric society in innovation raw materials and novel cloths. Horse leather/hairs were also used to make items, presumably, clothes. In all likelihood, during the transition from the third to the second millennia BCE some northern Eurasia regions began to adopt specialized goat and sheep husbandry for wool, such specialization is reflected in the age composition of the sheep and goat flocks based on the analysis of archaeological assemblages, for example, an assemblage from a settlement in the southern Urals attributed to the Srubnaya (Timber-Grave) culture which dates to the first half of the second millennium BCE. The analysis of our dataset did not identify hairs and fur of other animals (domestic dog, camel, ground-squirrel, hair, beaver, etc.), though bones of these animals have been found in archaeological contexts in various areas of the study region. This analysis has revealed a special role that goat and sheep wool played in the production of novel wool cloths in northern Eurasia.
来自欧亚大陆北部的青铜时代羊毛纺织品和毛皮制品:纤维来源的鉴定和家畜物种的区分
从南高加索和欧亚大陆北部的不同地点获得的保存完好的青铜器时代羊毛纺织品样品被用来对纤维进行技术分析,以确定动物纤维的来源。我们的研究目的是基于羊毛纤维和毛发结构等特征,将青铜器时代考古羊毛纤维数据集与哺乳动物物种参考数据集进行比较。在南高加索地区、东欧的草原、森林草原和森林带、西伯利亚南部和哈萨克斯坦,已查明的两种羊毛原料表明,山羊绒毛和绵羊羊毛等次级产品的使用很可能与一些地方社会畜牧业的变化以及各种专门类型的地方畜牧业的出现有关。包括有意饲养羊来生产肉和奶,以及逐渐向羊毛生产过渡,这是满足史前社会在创新原材料和新型布料方面的需要所必需的。马皮/马毛也被用来制作物品,大概是衣服。很有可能,在公元前三千年到公元前二千年的过渡时期,欧亚大陆北部的一些地区开始采用专门的山羊和绵羊养殖来生产羊毛,这种专业化反映在基于考古组合分析的绵羊和山羊群的年龄构成中,例如,乌拉尔南部的一个定居点的组合被认为是Srubnaya(木材坟墓)文化,可以追溯到公元前二千年的上半叶。对我们数据集的分析没有发现其他动物的毛发和皮毛(家犬、骆驼、地松鼠、毛发、海狸等),尽管在研究区域的各个地区的考古背景中发现了这些动物的骨头。这一分析揭示了山羊和绵羊羊毛在欧亚大陆北部新型羊毛织物的生产中所起的特殊作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Archaeological Research in Asia presents high quality scholarly research conducted in between the Bosporus and the Pacific on a broad range of archaeological subjects of importance to audiences across Asia and around the world. The journal covers the traditional components of archaeology: placing events and patterns in time and space; analysis of past lifeways; and explanations for cultural processes and change. To this end, the publication will highlight theoretical and methodological advances in studying the past, present new data, and detail patterns that reshape our understanding of it. Archaeological Research in Asia publishes work on the full temporal range of archaeological inquiry from the earliest human presence in Asia with a special emphasis on time periods under-represented in other venues. Journal contributions are of three kinds: articles, case reports and short communications. Full length articles should present synthetic treatments, novel analyses, or theoretical approaches to unresolved issues. Case reports present basic data on subjects that are of broad interest because they represent key sites, sequences, and subjects that figure prominently, or should figure prominently, in how scholars both inside and outside Asia understand the archaeology of cultural and biological change through time. Short communications present new findings (e.g., radiocarbon dates) that are important to the extent that they reaffirm or change the way scholars in Asia and around the world think about Asian cultural or biological history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信