Compatibility, integration, and epistemology: Contemporary issues from a mixed methods research experiment

Q2 Psychology
Andréanne Simard B.A. , Isabelle F.-Dufour Ph. D , Rose Malchelosse-Fournier M. Ps. éd , Jérémy Perreault B. Éd , Carol Hudon Ph. D
{"title":"Compatibility, integration, and epistemology: Contemporary issues from a mixed methods research experiment","authors":"Andréanne Simard B.A. ,&nbsp;Isabelle F.-Dufour Ph. D ,&nbsp;Rose Malchelosse-Fournier M. Ps. éd ,&nbsp;Jérémy Perreault B. Éd ,&nbsp;Carol Hudon Ph. D","doi":"10.1016/j.metip.2025.100187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in Mixed Methods Research (MMR) makes it possible to benefit from the different strengths of each method. However, achieving a successful combination is not always easy. This article discusses the use of MMR in a study of clinical intervention, detailing the challenges, some insurmountable, encountered in designing the methodology, integrating the results, and preparing for the work for publication. These challenges are contextualized by reference to the current literature on MMR. The authors conclude by discussing the evolution of MMR and call for further critical reflection on compatibility, theory, and epistemology, and the resources and skills required to use the method effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93338,"journal":{"name":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259026012500013X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in Mixed Methods Research (MMR) makes it possible to benefit from the different strengths of each method. However, achieving a successful combination is not always easy. This article discusses the use of MMR in a study of clinical intervention, detailing the challenges, some insurmountable, encountered in designing the methodology, integrating the results, and preparing for the work for publication. These challenges are contextualized by reference to the current literature on MMR. The authors conclude by discussing the evolution of MMR and call for further critical reflection on compatibility, theory, and epistemology, and the resources and skills required to use the method effectively.
相容性、整合与认识论:混合方法研究实验的当代问题
在混合方法研究(MMR)中结合定量和定性方法,可以从每种方法的不同优势中受益。然而,实现一个成功的组合并不总是容易的。本文讨论了MMR在临床干预研究中的应用,详细介绍了在设计方法、整合结果和准备发表工作时遇到的一些不可克服的挑战。通过参考目前关于MMR的文献,对这些挑战进行了背景分析。作者最后讨论了MMR的演变,并呼吁对兼容性、理论和认识论以及有效使用该方法所需的资源和技能进行进一步的批判性反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Methods in Psychology (Online)
Methods in Psychology (Online) Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信