Distribution regression with censored selection

IF 9.9 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Songnian Chen , Nianqing Liu , Hanghui Zhang
{"title":"Distribution regression with censored selection","authors":"Songnian Chen ,&nbsp;Nianqing Liu ,&nbsp;Hanghui Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconom.2025.106030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Chernozhukov, Fernández-Val, and Luo (2023, CFL (2023) hereafter) considered a distribution regression model subject to sample selection with a binary selection mechanism. In this paper, we show how to identify and estimate a semi-parametric distribution regression model subject to a censored selection rule. With censored selection, we do not need to impose the usual outcome exclusion restriction or exclusion of the level of the latent selection variable from the selection sorting function for model identification, unlike CFL (2023). We propose new semiparametric estimators and corresponding inference procedures for model parameters and related functional parameters. We apply our method to investigate wage inequality in the UK for the period 1978–2000 using the Family Expenditure Survey (FES) data. Our findings reveal that (i) the selection sorting exclusion and outcome exclusion restrictions imposed by CFL (2023) are rejected; (ii) there is negative selection into work at most quantile levels for females, but not for males; (iii) in contrast to CFL (2023), our selection sorting effect pattern does not offer clear evidence on assortative matching or glass ceiling in the UK labor market; (iv) the latent gender wage gaps after correcting for selection bias are about 25%–50% of CFL (2023)’s estimates, and are also significantly smaller than the observed wage gaps; (v) similar to CFL (2023), there exists some strong evidence on gender discrimination in the UK labor market.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Econometrics","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 106030"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304407625000843","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chernozhukov, Fernández-Val, and Luo (2023, CFL (2023) hereafter) considered a distribution regression model subject to sample selection with a binary selection mechanism. In this paper, we show how to identify and estimate a semi-parametric distribution regression model subject to a censored selection rule. With censored selection, we do not need to impose the usual outcome exclusion restriction or exclusion of the level of the latent selection variable from the selection sorting function for model identification, unlike CFL (2023). We propose new semiparametric estimators and corresponding inference procedures for model parameters and related functional parameters. We apply our method to investigate wage inequality in the UK for the period 1978–2000 using the Family Expenditure Survey (FES) data. Our findings reveal that (i) the selection sorting exclusion and outcome exclusion restrictions imposed by CFL (2023) are rejected; (ii) there is negative selection into work at most quantile levels for females, but not for males; (iii) in contrast to CFL (2023), our selection sorting effect pattern does not offer clear evidence on assortative matching or glass ceiling in the UK labor market; (iv) the latent gender wage gaps after correcting for selection bias are about 25%–50% of CFL (2023)’s estimates, and are also significantly smaller than the observed wage gaps; (v) similar to CFL (2023), there exists some strong evidence on gender discrimination in the UK labor market.
带有删节选择的分布回归
Chernozhukov, Fernández-Val, and Luo (2023, CFL(2023),后文)考虑了一种基于二元选择机制的样本选择的分布回归模型。在本文中,我们展示了如何识别和估计受删节选择规则约束的半参数分布回归模型。与CFL(2023)不同,使用审查选择,我们不需要强加通常的结果排除限制或从模型识别的选择排序函数中排除潜在选择变量的水平。我们提出了模型参数和相关函数参数的半参数估计和相应的推理方法。我们使用家庭支出调查(FES)数据应用我们的方法来调查1978-2000年期间英国的工资不平等。研究结果表明:(1)CFL(2023)的选择排序排除和结果排除限制被拒绝;(ii)在大多数分位数水平上,女性存在负向选择,但男性没有;(iii)与CFL(2023)相比,我们的选择分类效应模式没有提供关于英国劳动力市场分类匹配或玻璃天花板的明确证据;(iv)修正选择偏差后的潜在性别工资差距约为CFL(2023)估计的25%-50%,也显著小于观察到的工资差距;(v)与CFL(2023)相似,英国劳动力市场存在一些关于性别歧视的有力证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Econometrics
Journal of Econometrics 社会科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.60%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Econometrics serves as an outlet for important, high quality, new research in both theoretical and applied econometrics. The scope of the Journal includes papers dealing with identification, estimation, testing, decision, and prediction issues encountered in economic research. Classical Bayesian statistics, and machine learning methods, are decidedly within the range of the Journal''s interests. The Annals of Econometrics is a supplement to the Journal of Econometrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信