Convergence of plant-leafminer associations on two continents

IF 3.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Xiaona Chen , Xiaohua Dai , Qingyun Guo , Charles S. Eiseman
{"title":"Convergence of plant-leafminer associations on two continents","authors":"Xiaona Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaohua Dai ,&nbsp;Qingyun Guo ,&nbsp;Charles S. Eiseman","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Plant-herbivore interactions are known to play a pivotal role in shaping global biodiversity and maintaining biosphere stability, with leafminers being recognized as a unique and specialized ecological group within these networks. Despite their ecological significance, plant-leafminer interaction networks have remained understudied, particularly at regional scales. Using up-to-date datasets from Europe and North America, the convergence and divergence of plant-leafminer associations across these continents were examined. Contrary to the hypothesis that significant incongruence would arise due to contrasting biogeographical histories, it was found that plant-leafminer network structures were relatively similar, potentially driven by shared backbone partners or lower taxonomic resolutions. While overall network structures exhibited relative convergence, taxon-specific metrics revealed both similarities and divergences, highlighting the complexity of these interactions. Angiosperms were identified as the dominant host plant phylum, and Lepidoptera emerged as the most prevalent leafminer order. Many leafminers were observed to exhibit narrow host ranges, with plants typically associated with between one and five leafminer genera. However, shared generalist leafminers and host plants, which interact with a wide range of partners, were also present across the two continents. Significant phylogenetic signals were detected on both continents, particularly within subclades such as Spermatophyta, Eudicots + Nymphaeaceae, and Monocots + Eudicots, indicating that closely related plants tend to host similar leafminer communities. This study represents the first systematic comparison of plant-leafminer network structures at the continental scale, providing novel insights into insect-host interaction networks under diverse evolutionary and biogeographic contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article e03656"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425002574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant-herbivore interactions are known to play a pivotal role in shaping global biodiversity and maintaining biosphere stability, with leafminers being recognized as a unique and specialized ecological group within these networks. Despite their ecological significance, plant-leafminer interaction networks have remained understudied, particularly at regional scales. Using up-to-date datasets from Europe and North America, the convergence and divergence of plant-leafminer associations across these continents were examined. Contrary to the hypothesis that significant incongruence would arise due to contrasting biogeographical histories, it was found that plant-leafminer network structures were relatively similar, potentially driven by shared backbone partners or lower taxonomic resolutions. While overall network structures exhibited relative convergence, taxon-specific metrics revealed both similarities and divergences, highlighting the complexity of these interactions. Angiosperms were identified as the dominant host plant phylum, and Lepidoptera emerged as the most prevalent leafminer order. Many leafminers were observed to exhibit narrow host ranges, with plants typically associated with between one and five leafminer genera. However, shared generalist leafminers and host plants, which interact with a wide range of partners, were also present across the two continents. Significant phylogenetic signals were detected on both continents, particularly within subclades such as Spermatophyta, Eudicots + Nymphaeaceae, and Monocots + Eudicots, indicating that closely related plants tend to host similar leafminer communities. This study represents the first systematic comparison of plant-leafminer network structures at the continental scale, providing novel insights into insect-host interaction networks under diverse evolutionary and biogeographic contexts.
两大洲植物-叶螨协会的趋同
植物与食草动物的相互作用在塑造全球生物多样性和维持生物圈稳定方面发挥着关键作用,而叶蝉被认为是这些网络中独特而特殊的生态群体。尽管它们具有重要的生态意义,但植物-叶螨相互作用网络的研究仍然不足,特别是在区域尺度上。利用来自欧洲和北美的最新数据集,研究了这些大陆上植物-叶螨协会的趋同和分化。与生物地理历史差异会导致显著不一致的假设相反,研究发现植物-叶螨网络结构相对相似,可能是由共享的骨干伙伴或较低的分类分辨率驱动的。虽然整体网络结构表现出相对趋同,但分类群特异性指标显示出相似性和差异性,突出了这些相互作用的复杂性。被子植物是主要寄主植物门,鳞翅目是最常见的叶蚁目。许多叶蝉的寄主范围很窄,植物通常与一到五个叶蝉属有关。然而,与广泛的合作伙伴相互作用的共同通才叶矿工和寄主植物也出现在两大洲。在两个大陆上都发现了显著的系统发育信号,特别是在种子植物亚分支中,如Eudicots + 若虫科和单子叶植物+ Eudicots,表明密切相关的植物倾向于拥有相似的叶螨群落。该研究首次在大陆尺度上对植物-叶螨网络结构进行了系统比较,为不同进化和生物地理背景下的昆虫-宿主相互作用网络提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信