Clinical outcomes of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for postoperative recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

IF 2.6 3区 医学
Takahito Sugase, Takashi Kanemura, Norihiro Matsuura, Keijiro Sugimura, Tomohira Takeoka, Yuki Ushimaru, Yasunori Masuike, Yoshitomo Yanagimoto, Ryota Mori, Masatoshi Kitakaze, Masahiko Kubo, Yosuke Mukai, Hisateru Komatsu, Toshinori Sueda, Yoshinori Kagawa, Junichi Nishimura, Hiroshi Wada, Masayoshi Yasui, Hiroshi Miyata
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for postoperative recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.","authors":"Takahito Sugase, Takashi Kanemura, Norihiro Matsuura, Keijiro Sugimura, Tomohira Takeoka, Yuki Ushimaru, Yasunori Masuike, Yoshitomo Yanagimoto, Ryota Mori, Masatoshi Kitakaze, Masahiko Kubo, Yosuke Mukai, Hisateru Komatsu, Toshinori Sueda, Yoshinori Kagawa, Junichi Nishimura, Hiroshi Wada, Masayoshi Yasui, Hiroshi Miyata","doi":"10.1093/dote/doaf029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has been the first-line treatment for metastatic or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, postoperative recurrences have not been sufficiently investigated. We investigated the clinical outcomes of pembrolizumab plus cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (CF) therapy for postoperative recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 100 consecutive patients with postoperative recurrence and compared their treatment response and survival outcomes in response to pembrolizumab plus CF therapy and conventional CF therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pembrolizumab plus CF therapy had higher response and objective response rates (41% vs. 27%, 77% vs. 57%, respectively) and prolonged progression-free survival (median 6.5 vs. 4.9 months, P = 0.011) and overall survival (not reached [NR] vs. 14.0 months, P = 0.087) compared to CF therapy. Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) ≧20% had a longer duration of response with pembrolizumab plus CF therapy compared with conventional CF therapy (NR vs. 10.2 months, P = 0.007). Conversely, the additional benefit of pembrolizumab in CF therapy was limited when ETS was <20% (4.0 vs. 3.4 months, P = 0.814). CF therapy was associated with worse survival outcomes for recurrences within 6 months post-surgery compared to those after 6 months. Pembrolizumab plus CF therapy provided comparable survival outcomes regardless of the timing of recurrence; however, it was less effective in combined positive score < 10 within the first 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>First-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for postoperative recurrent esophageal cancer improved clinical outcomes compared to conventional CF therapy and can be expected to be one of the treatment options even in early postoperative recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"38 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaf029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has been the first-line treatment for metastatic or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, postoperative recurrences have not been sufficiently investigated. We investigated the clinical outcomes of pembrolizumab plus cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (CF) therapy for postoperative recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 100 consecutive patients with postoperative recurrence and compared their treatment response and survival outcomes in response to pembrolizumab plus CF therapy and conventional CF therapy.

Results: Pembrolizumab plus CF therapy had higher response and objective response rates (41% vs. 27%, 77% vs. 57%, respectively) and prolonged progression-free survival (median 6.5 vs. 4.9 months, P = 0.011) and overall survival (not reached [NR] vs. 14.0 months, P = 0.087) compared to CF therapy. Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) ≧20% had a longer duration of response with pembrolizumab plus CF therapy compared with conventional CF therapy (NR vs. 10.2 months, P = 0.007). Conversely, the additional benefit of pembrolizumab in CF therapy was limited when ETS was <20% (4.0 vs. 3.4 months, P = 0.814). CF therapy was associated with worse survival outcomes for recurrences within 6 months post-surgery compared to those after 6 months. Pembrolizumab plus CF therapy provided comparable survival outcomes regardless of the timing of recurrence; however, it was less effective in combined positive score < 10 within the first 6 months.

Conclusion: First-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for postoperative recurrent esophageal cancer improved clinical outcomes compared to conventional CF therapy and can be expected to be one of the treatment options even in early postoperative recurrence.

派姆单抗联合化疗治疗食管鳞癌术后复发的临床疗效。
背景:免疫联合化疗已成为转移性或不可切除的局部晚期食管癌的一线治疗方法。然而,术后复发尚未得到充分的调查。我们研究了派姆单抗+顺铂+ 5-氟尿嘧啶(CF)治疗术后复发性食管鳞状细胞癌的临床结果。方法:我们回顾性分析了连续100例术后复发患者,并比较了他们对派姆单抗联合CF治疗和常规CF治疗的治疗反应和生存结果。结果:与CF治疗相比,派姆单抗联合CF治疗具有更高的缓解率和客观缓解率(分别为41%对27%,77%对57%),延长无进展生存期(中位6.5个月对4.9个月,P = 0.011)和总生存期(未达到[NR]对14.0个月,P = 0.087)。与常规CF治疗相比,派姆单抗联合CF治疗的早期肿瘤缩小(ETS≧20%)持续时间更长(NR vs. 10.2个月,P = 0.007)。结论:与传统的食管癌治疗相比,一线派姆单抗联合化疗可改善食管癌术后复发的临床结果,即使是术后早期复发,也有望成为治疗选择之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信