Effective treatment using a single-stage revision with non-contact low frequency ultrasonic debridement in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection : a prospective single-arm study.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Baochao Ji, Chenchen Yang, Abudousaimi Aimaiti, Fei Wang, Guoqing Li, Xiaogang Zhang, Yicheng Li, Li Cao
{"title":"Effective treatment using a single-stage revision with non-contact low frequency ultrasonic debridement in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection : a prospective single-arm study.","authors":"Baochao Ji, Chenchen Yang, Abudousaimi Aimaiti, Fei Wang, Guoqing Li, Xiaogang Zhang, Yicheng Li, Li Cao","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-0848.R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In the surgical treatment of a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), traditional mechanical debridement can only remove visibly infected tissue; not all of the biofilms can be removed. The aim of this study was to report the results of a single-stage revision using non-contact low-frequency ultrasonic debridement (NLFUD) in the treatment of chronic PJIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study of patients undergoing single-stage revision for chronic PJI, between August 2021 and June 2022. After mechanical debridement, an 8 mm handheld non-contact low-frequency ultrasound probe was used for debridement at a frequency of 25 ± 5 kHz and power of 90%, for five minutes. Each debridement lasted for ten seconds, with three-second intervals. The probe repeatedly sonicated all soft-tissue and bony surfaces. Before and after NLFUD, 25 ml of fluid was extracted from the surgical field for bacterial culture and counting. Chemical debridement was then used to irrigate the whole field. The bacteriological findings, recurrence of infection, and complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 45 patients (25 infected total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and 20 infected total knee arthroplasties (TKAs)) were included. Overall, 43 patients (95.6%) were free of infection at a mean follow-up of 29 months (24 to 33). There were no complications relating to the ultrasonic debridement, with no neurovascular or muscle injury, no poor wound healing, and no fat liquefaction. The rate of positive culture in the fluid from the surgical field before ultrasonic debridement was 40.0% (18/45), and it significantly increased to 75.6% (34/45) after ultrasonic debridement (p = 0.001). The median number of colony-forming units (CFUs) before debridement was 307 CFU/ml (IQR 225 to 585) significantly improved to 2,372 CFUs/ml (IQR 2,045 to 2,685; p < 0.001) after debridement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that a favourable short-term control of infection can be achieved in these patients by a single-stage revision using NLFUD, without associated complications. However, further robust evidence is required to confirm the clinical benefits of using NLFUD under these circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 6 Supple B","pages":"9-14"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-0848.R2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: In the surgical treatment of a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), traditional mechanical debridement can only remove visibly infected tissue; not all of the biofilms can be removed. The aim of this study was to report the results of a single-stage revision using non-contact low-frequency ultrasonic debridement (NLFUD) in the treatment of chronic PJIs.

Methods: This was a prospective study of patients undergoing single-stage revision for chronic PJI, between August 2021 and June 2022. After mechanical debridement, an 8 mm handheld non-contact low-frequency ultrasound probe was used for debridement at a frequency of 25 ± 5 kHz and power of 90%, for five minutes. Each debridement lasted for ten seconds, with three-second intervals. The probe repeatedly sonicated all soft-tissue and bony surfaces. Before and after NLFUD, 25 ml of fluid was extracted from the surgical field for bacterial culture and counting. Chemical debridement was then used to irrigate the whole field. The bacteriological findings, recurrence of infection, and complications were recorded.

Results: A total of 45 patients (25 infected total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and 20 infected total knee arthroplasties (TKAs)) were included. Overall, 43 patients (95.6%) were free of infection at a mean follow-up of 29 months (24 to 33). There were no complications relating to the ultrasonic debridement, with no neurovascular or muscle injury, no poor wound healing, and no fat liquefaction. The rate of positive culture in the fluid from the surgical field before ultrasonic debridement was 40.0% (18/45), and it significantly increased to 75.6% (34/45) after ultrasonic debridement (p = 0.001). The median number of colony-forming units (CFUs) before debridement was 307 CFU/ml (IQR 225 to 585) significantly improved to 2,372 CFUs/ml (IQR 2,045 to 2,685; p < 0.001) after debridement.

Conclusion: We found that a favourable short-term control of infection can be achieved in these patients by a single-stage revision using NLFUD, without associated complications. However, further robust evidence is required to confirm the clinical benefits of using NLFUD under these circumstances.

单阶段翻修非接触式低频超声清创治疗假体周围关节感染的有效治疗:一项前瞻性单臂研究。
目的:在手术治疗假体周围关节感染(PJI)时,传统的机械清创只能去除明显的感染组织;并不是所有的生物膜都能被去除。本研究的目的是报道使用非接触式低频超声清创(NLFUD)治疗慢性PJIs的单阶段翻修的结果。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,在2021年8月至2022年6月期间对慢性PJI进行单期翻修。机械清创后,使用8 mm手持式非接触式低频超声探头,频率为25±5 kHz,功率为90%,清创5分钟。每次清创持续10秒,间隔3秒。探针反复超声所有软组织和骨表面。在NLFUD前后,从手术野中抽取25 ml液体进行细菌培养和计数。然后用化学清创对整个田地进行灌溉。记录细菌学检查结果、感染复发情况及并发症。结果:共纳入45例患者,其中感染全髋关节置换术(THAs) 25例,感染全膝关节置换术(tka) 20例。总体而言,43例患者(95.6%)在平均随访29个月(24至33个月)时无感染。超声清创无并发症,无神经血管或肌肉损伤,无创面愈合不良,无脂肪液化。超声清创前术野液阳性培养率为40.0%(18/45),超声清创后为75.6%(34/45),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.001)。清创前菌落形成单位(CFU)的中位数为307 CFU/ml (IQR 225至585),显著改善至2372 CFU/ml (IQR 2,045至2,685;P < 0.001)。结论:我们发现,在这些患者中,使用NLFUD进行单期翻修可以获得良好的短期感染控制,无相关并发症。然而,需要进一步的有力证据来证实在这些情况下使用NLFUD的临床益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信