Does CT improve the accuracy of predicting implant fixation status for periprosthetic fractures around uncemented femoral components?

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Reese Courington, Rogerio Ferreira, M Kareem Shaath, Cody Green, Joshua Langford, George John Haidukewych
{"title":"Does CT improve the accuracy of predicting implant fixation status for periprosthetic fractures around uncemented femoral components?","authors":"Reese Courington, Rogerio Ferreira, M Kareem Shaath, Cody Green, Joshua Langford, George John Haidukewych","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-0829.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFFs) around total hip arthroplasty (THA) stems are challenging. Typically, loose stems are revised, while well-fixed implants undergo fracture open reduction and internal fixation. Determining implant fixation status preoperatively is important. The purpose of this study was to define the accuracy of predicting the status of preoperative stem fixation using radiography and CT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 24 patients with Vancouver B-type PPFF with preoperative radiography and CT scans were included. Patients with obviously loose implants (detached or subsided stem), fractures that occurred within 90 days of index THA, and cemented femoral components were excluded. Two fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeons and two traumatologists reviewed radiographs and predicted stem fixation status. They then evaluated CT scans, and fixation status was reassessed. Each surgeon undertook two evaluations one month apart. The correct response was determined by intraoperative findings. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability values were calculated, as well as validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 15 implants (62.5%) were well-fixed and nine (37.5%) were loose. Radiography alone predicted correct fixation status in 53.1% of cases (102/192). When adding CT, correct predictions improved to 54.7% (105/192). Fixation status predictions were changed in 18.2% of cases (35/192) after reviewing CT scans: 8.3% (16/192) from correct to incorrect, and 9.9% (19/192) from incorrect to correct. Interobserver reliability ranged from poor to moderate agreement, and intraobserver reliability demonstrated moderate agreement for all raters. No difference in accuracy was noted between adult reconstruction or trauma surgeons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ability to predict fixation status for PPFFs around uncemented femoral components remains challenging. The addition of preoperative CT did not significantly improve accuracy. Intraoperative testing of femoral component fixation status is essential to determine if revision or fixation is appropriate. Preoperative CT for Vancouver B PPFF does not significantly improve accuracy in assessing stem fixation status compared with plain radiography.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 6 Supple B","pages":"42-46"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-0829.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFFs) around total hip arthroplasty (THA) stems are challenging. Typically, loose stems are revised, while well-fixed implants undergo fracture open reduction and internal fixation. Determining implant fixation status preoperatively is important. The purpose of this study was to define the accuracy of predicting the status of preoperative stem fixation using radiography and CT.

Methods: A total of 24 patients with Vancouver B-type PPFF with preoperative radiography and CT scans were included. Patients with obviously loose implants (detached or subsided stem), fractures that occurred within 90 days of index THA, and cemented femoral components were excluded. Two fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeons and two traumatologists reviewed radiographs and predicted stem fixation status. They then evaluated CT scans, and fixation status was reassessed. Each surgeon undertook two evaluations one month apart. The correct response was determined by intraoperative findings. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability values were calculated, as well as validity.

Results: Overall, 15 implants (62.5%) were well-fixed and nine (37.5%) were loose. Radiography alone predicted correct fixation status in 53.1% of cases (102/192). When adding CT, correct predictions improved to 54.7% (105/192). Fixation status predictions were changed in 18.2% of cases (35/192) after reviewing CT scans: 8.3% (16/192) from correct to incorrect, and 9.9% (19/192) from incorrect to correct. Interobserver reliability ranged from poor to moderate agreement, and intraobserver reliability demonstrated moderate agreement for all raters. No difference in accuracy was noted between adult reconstruction or trauma surgeons.

Conclusion: The ability to predict fixation status for PPFFs around uncemented femoral components remains challenging. The addition of preoperative CT did not significantly improve accuracy. Intraoperative testing of femoral component fixation status is essential to determine if revision or fixation is appropriate. Preoperative CT for Vancouver B PPFF does not significantly improve accuracy in assessing stem fixation status compared with plain radiography.

CT是否能提高预测股骨假体周围未骨水泥假体周围骨折假体固定状态的准确性?
目的:全髋关节置换术(THA)周围股骨假体周围骨折(ppff)具有挑战性。通常情况下,对松动的假体进行复位,同时对固定良好的假体进行骨折切开复位和内固定。术前确定种植体固定状态很重要。本研究的目的是确定利用x线摄影和CT预测术前椎弓根固定状态的准确性。方法:对24例温哥华b型PPFF患者进行术前x线及CT检查。排除假体明显松动(假体脱落或沉降)、指数THA术后90天内发生骨折以及股骨假体骨水泥的患者。两名接受过奖学金培训的成人重建外科医生和两名创伤学家回顾了x线片并预测了干固定状态。然后他们评估了CT扫描,并重新评估了固定状态。每位外科医生间隔一个月进行两次评估。正确的反应由术中发现决定。计算观察者间和观察者内的信度值以及效度。结果:总体而言,15个种植体(62.5%)固定良好,9个(37.5%)松动。仅x线摄影预测正确固定状态的病例为53.1%(102/192)。加入CT后,预测正确率提高到54.7%(105/192)。回顾CT扫描后,18.2%的病例(35/192)的固定状态预测发生了变化:8.3%(16/192)从正确到不正确,9.9%(19/192)从错误到正确。观察者之间的信度从差到中等程度的一致,而观察者内部的信度显示了所有评分者的中等程度的一致。成人重建外科医生和创伤外科医生在准确性上没有差异。结论:预测未骨水泥股骨假体周围ppff的固定状态的能力仍然具有挑战性。术前CT检查并没有显著提高准确率。术中检测股骨假体的固定状态对于确定是否需要进行翻修或固定是必要的。与x线平片相比,术前CT对Vancouver B PPFF评估椎体固定状态的准确性没有显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信