Cobalt toxicity from third-body wear following revision of fractured ceramic-on-ceramic hip bearings with a metal articulation : the fractured ceramic syndrome.
E Bailey Terhune, E Grant Sutter, Rishi Balkissoon, Graham Pallante, Lawrence M Specht, Jerrold Leikin, Young-Min Kwon, David G Lewallen, Tad L Gerlinger, Joshua J Jacobs
{"title":"Cobalt toxicity from third-body wear following revision of fractured ceramic-on-ceramic hip bearings with a metal articulation : the fractured ceramic syndrome.","authors":"E Bailey Terhune, E Grant Sutter, Rishi Balkissoon, Graham Pallante, Lawrence M Specht, Jerrold Leikin, Young-Min Kwon, David G Lewallen, Tad L Gerlinger, Joshua J Jacobs","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-1114.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) articulations in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have the advantage of low wear but the unique risk of fracture. After revision for CoC-bearing fracture, third-body ceramic particles can lead to massive wear of cobalt-chrome (CoCr) bearings, causing extremely elevated blood cobalt. We present a multicentre series of five cases where patients sustained fractures of ceramic liners, were revised using a CoCr articulation, and rapidly developed severe cobalt toxicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified five cases of cobalt toxicity after fractured CoC THA treated with revision to CoCr on polyethylene bearings. Mean follow-up was three years (5 to 72 months) after re-revision to remove the CoCr bearing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Symptoms of cobalt toxicity occurred at a mean ten months (6 to 12) after revision for ceramic fracture. All patients developed vision and hearing loss, balance difficulties, and peripheral neuropathy. Several had cardiomyopathy, endocrine abnormalities, and local skin discolouration. Only two reported hip pain. Repeat revision for recognized cobalt toxicity occurred at a mean 22 months after revision for ceramic fracture. Mean serum cobalt level at re-revision was 991 ng/ml (normal value < 1 ng/ml; 734 to 1,302). All CoCr femoral heads exhibited massive wear, and deep tissues showed prominent metal staining. Treatment consisted of debridement and revision to a ceramic femoral head with highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) liner. Serum cobalt improved to a mean 25 μg/l (1 to 76) at final follow-up. All patients reported partial improvement in vision and hearing, however their peripheral neuropathy and balance difficulties did not recover.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Systemic cobalt toxicity is a devastating complication of ceramic-bearing fracture in THA treated with CoCr bearings, which may not present with hip symptoms. The diagnosis of this syndrome of systemic cobalt toxicity was significantly delayed following systemic symptoms in this series. Debridement and re-revision to a ceramic-on-HXLPE bearing leads to improvement, but not full resolution, of cobalt toxicity complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 6 Supple B","pages":"92-100"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-1114.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) articulations in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have the advantage of low wear but the unique risk of fracture. After revision for CoC-bearing fracture, third-body ceramic particles can lead to massive wear of cobalt-chrome (CoCr) bearings, causing extremely elevated blood cobalt. We present a multicentre series of five cases where patients sustained fractures of ceramic liners, were revised using a CoCr articulation, and rapidly developed severe cobalt toxicity.
Methods: We identified five cases of cobalt toxicity after fractured CoC THA treated with revision to CoCr on polyethylene bearings. Mean follow-up was three years (5 to 72 months) after re-revision to remove the CoCr bearing.
Results: Symptoms of cobalt toxicity occurred at a mean ten months (6 to 12) after revision for ceramic fracture. All patients developed vision and hearing loss, balance difficulties, and peripheral neuropathy. Several had cardiomyopathy, endocrine abnormalities, and local skin discolouration. Only two reported hip pain. Repeat revision for recognized cobalt toxicity occurred at a mean 22 months after revision for ceramic fracture. Mean serum cobalt level at re-revision was 991 ng/ml (normal value < 1 ng/ml; 734 to 1,302). All CoCr femoral heads exhibited massive wear, and deep tissues showed prominent metal staining. Treatment consisted of debridement and revision to a ceramic femoral head with highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) liner. Serum cobalt improved to a mean 25 μg/l (1 to 76) at final follow-up. All patients reported partial improvement in vision and hearing, however their peripheral neuropathy and balance difficulties did not recover.
Conclusion: Systemic cobalt toxicity is a devastating complication of ceramic-bearing fracture in THA treated with CoCr bearings, which may not present with hip symptoms. The diagnosis of this syndrome of systemic cobalt toxicity was significantly delayed following systemic symptoms in this series. Debridement and re-revision to a ceramic-on-HXLPE bearing leads to improvement, but not full resolution, of cobalt toxicity complications.
期刊介绍:
We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.