Neel Badhe, Christopher Busby, Abbas See, Christopher Deacon, Tareq Altell, Ben J Ollivere, Ben A Marson
{"title":"Waterproof casts for the management of upper limb fractures in children : a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Neel Badhe, Christopher Busby, Abbas See, Christopher Deacon, Tareq Altell, Ben J Ollivere, Ben A Marson","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2025-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Upper limb fractures in children are often managed in casts. Waterproof casts which allow safe immersion in water may be used. These may improve comfort, convenience, and satisfaction when compared with standard casts. The aim of this review was to compare the efficacy, safety, and satisfaction of waterproof casts with standard casts in the management of upper limb fractures in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in September 2024. Comprehensive searches of Medline, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases were performed. Studies were included which recruited children aged 0 to 18 years with upper limb fractures, which were managed in waterproof or standard casts. Patient-reported outcomes, functional outcomes, and complication rates were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of five studies involving 390 children were included. Those managed with a waterproof cast reported significantly superior satisfaction with regard to comfort (mean difference (MD) 1.92 (95% CI 0.15 to 3.69); p = 0.034), itchiness (MD 0.21 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.43); p = 0.047), and overall child and parent satisfaction (MD 0.53 (95% CI 0.01 to 1.05); p = 0.048). Those managed with a waterproof cast also had significantly improved functional outcomes as measured by the Activities Scale for Kids-Performance (ASK-P) score, with a MD of 16.90 (95% CI 6.87 to 26.93; p = 0.001). There were no significant differences regarding heat or sweatiness, pain, return to recreational activities, unexpected returns for cast maintenance, radiological deformity, or skin problems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Waterproof casts seem to provide an alternative to standard casts in the management of upper limb fractures in children. There were improved functional outcomes at the time of removal of the cast, improved comfort, and less itching. Pooling of the studies was limited due to the heterogeneity of the reporting of outcomes and the small sizes of the studies. Neither long-term outcomes, nor economic analysis based on healthcare-related quality of life, are available. A definitive RCT based on a core outcome set is required to confirm the efficacy and investigate the cost-effectiveness of waterproof casts in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 6","pages":"587-594"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2025-0011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Upper limb fractures in children are often managed in casts. Waterproof casts which allow safe immersion in water may be used. These may improve comfort, convenience, and satisfaction when compared with standard casts. The aim of this review was to compare the efficacy, safety, and satisfaction of waterproof casts with standard casts in the management of upper limb fractures in children.
Methods: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in September 2024. Comprehensive searches of Medline, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases were performed. Studies were included which recruited children aged 0 to 18 years with upper limb fractures, which were managed in waterproof or standard casts. Patient-reported outcomes, functional outcomes, and complication rates were assessed.
Results: A total of five studies involving 390 children were included. Those managed with a waterproof cast reported significantly superior satisfaction with regard to comfort (mean difference (MD) 1.92 (95% CI 0.15 to 3.69); p = 0.034), itchiness (MD 0.21 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.43); p = 0.047), and overall child and parent satisfaction (MD 0.53 (95% CI 0.01 to 1.05); p = 0.048). Those managed with a waterproof cast also had significantly improved functional outcomes as measured by the Activities Scale for Kids-Performance (ASK-P) score, with a MD of 16.90 (95% CI 6.87 to 26.93; p = 0.001). There were no significant differences regarding heat or sweatiness, pain, return to recreational activities, unexpected returns for cast maintenance, radiological deformity, or skin problems.
Conclusion: Waterproof casts seem to provide an alternative to standard casts in the management of upper limb fractures in children. There were improved functional outcomes at the time of removal of the cast, improved comfort, and less itching. Pooling of the studies was limited due to the heterogeneity of the reporting of outcomes and the small sizes of the studies. Neither long-term outcomes, nor economic analysis based on healthcare-related quality of life, are available. A definitive RCT based on a core outcome set is required to confirm the efficacy and investigate the cost-effectiveness of waterproof casts in children.
期刊介绍:
We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.