Barriers and facilitators to implementing Food is Medicine programs: Evidence from 21 food bank-healthcare partnerships.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bailey Houghtaling, Eliza Short, Christopher R Long, Elizabeth T Anderson Steeves, Maryan Isack, Laura Flournoy, Nicole Cawrse, Elise August, Wm Thomas Summerfelt, Eric Calloway
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to implementing Food is Medicine programs: Evidence from 21 food bank-healthcare partnerships.","authors":"Bailey Houghtaling, Eliza Short, Christopher R Long, Elizabeth T Anderson Steeves, Maryan Isack, Laura Flournoy, Nicole Cawrse, Elise August, Wm Thomas Summerfelt, Eric Calloway","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibaf013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Food is Medicine (FIM) programs identify people experiencing food insecurity and diet-related chronic disease and connect them with nutritious foods. Food banks and healthcare partners are well positioned to deliver FIM programs; however, there is limited knowledge about factors that influence FIM program implementation in this context.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The goal of this study was to understand barriers and facilitators to FIM program implementation within food bank-healthcare partnerships in diverse US settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A phenomenological study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with 21 programmatically and contextually diverse Food as Medicine 3.0 (FAM3) grantees, including food bank leads and some healthcare partners. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0 informed interview guide development, coding, and interpretation. Interviews and the analysis were completed by a team of trained researchers following best practices. Data was analyzed using Dedoose (version 9.2.12).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty participants across 21 FAM3 grantees engaged in an interview. Most grantees shared challenges related to initiating and maintaining the healthcare partnerships needed for FIM programs. The tracking, gathering, and/or sharing of FIM program implementation and evaluation data was another primary challenge. Furthermore, limited healthcare and food bank staff capacity to carry out FIM programs was another prominent barrier. Despite these challenges, FIM programs were considered adaptable, testable, and to meet a core need among neighbors, all of which were implementation facilitators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results of this study inform the need to design and test implementation strategies to overcome barriers to the implementation of a promising food bank-healthcare partnership model for FIM.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12169342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Food is Medicine (FIM) programs identify people experiencing food insecurity and diet-related chronic disease and connect them with nutritious foods. Food banks and healthcare partners are well positioned to deliver FIM programs; however, there is limited knowledge about factors that influence FIM program implementation in this context.

Purpose: The goal of this study was to understand barriers and facilitators to FIM program implementation within food bank-healthcare partnerships in diverse US settings.

Methods: A phenomenological study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with 21 programmatically and contextually diverse Food as Medicine 3.0 (FAM3) grantees, including food bank leads and some healthcare partners. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0 informed interview guide development, coding, and interpretation. Interviews and the analysis were completed by a team of trained researchers following best practices. Data was analyzed using Dedoose (version 9.2.12).

Results: Fifty participants across 21 FAM3 grantees engaged in an interview. Most grantees shared challenges related to initiating and maintaining the healthcare partnerships needed for FIM programs. The tracking, gathering, and/or sharing of FIM program implementation and evaluation data was another primary challenge. Furthermore, limited healthcare and food bank staff capacity to carry out FIM programs was another prominent barrier. Despite these challenges, FIM programs were considered adaptable, testable, and to meet a core need among neighbors, all of which were implementation facilitators.

Conclusions: Results of this study inform the need to design and test implementation strategies to overcome barriers to the implementation of a promising food bank-healthcare partnership model for FIM.

实施食品即药物计划的障碍和促进因素:来自21个食品银行-医疗保健合作伙伴关系的证据。
背景:食品即药物(FIM)计划确定正在经历粮食不安全和与饮食有关的慢性疾病的人群,并将他们与营养食品联系起来。食品银行和医疗保健合作伙伴在提供FIM项目方面处于有利地位;然而,在这种情况下,关于影响FIM计划实施的因素的知识有限。目的:本研究的目的是了解在美国不同环境下食品银行-医疗保健合作伙伴关系中实施FIM计划的障碍和促进因素。方法:采用半结构化访谈的现象学研究,对21名食品作为医学3.0 (FAM3)受助人进行了访谈,其中包括食品银行负责人和一些医疗保健合作伙伴。实施研究综合框架(CFIR) 2.0为访谈指南的开发、编码和解释提供了信息。访谈和分析由一组训练有素的研究人员按照最佳做法完成。使用Dedoose(9.2.12版本)分析数据。结果:来自21个FAM3受助人的50名参与者参与了访谈。大多数受资助者都面临与启动和维护FIM项目所需的医疗保健合作伙伴关系相关的挑战。跟踪、收集和/或共享FIM项目实施和评估数据是另一个主要挑战。此外,有限的医疗保健和食品银行工作人员执行FIM项目的能力是另一个突出的障碍。尽管存在这些挑战,FIM程序被认为是可适应的、可测试的,并且能够满足邻居之间的核心需求,所有这些都是实现促进者。结论:本研究的结果表明,需要设计和测试实施策略,以克服实施食品银行-医疗保健合作模式的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信