Impact of Prospective Audit and Feedback by Transitions of Care Pharmacists on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Isabella N Hernandez, Anastasia Bilinskaya, Shally S Singh, David M O'Sullivan, Abigail M Henry
{"title":"Impact of Prospective Audit and Feedback by Transitions of Care Pharmacists on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia.","authors":"Isabella N Hernandez, Anastasia Bilinskaya, Shally S Singh, David M O'Sullivan, Abigail M Henry","doi":"10.1177/08971900251345976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The 2019 Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Core Elements of Hospital Antibiotic Stewardship identifies community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) as a crucial area for improving antibiotic use. Transitions of care (TOC) pharmacists can optimize medication therapy for CAP patients. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective, multi-hospital analysis of discharge antibiotic prescribing. Between December 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023, TOC pharmacists intervened to decrease discharge days of therapy (DOT) for CAP therapy. The study compared records of CAP patients with a TOC antibiotic stewardship intervention vs those without. An additional three-group analysis compared patients without an intervention to those with an accepted intervention to those with a rejected intervention. <b>Results:</b> 196 patient records were included in the analysis; 80 had a TOC pharmacist intervention and 116 did not. 62 interventions were accepted and 18 were rejected. Mean final discharge DOT was 3.8 ± 1.7 days in the non-intervention group and 3.4 ± 1.6 days in the intervention group (<i>P</i> = 0.231). Mean total DOT was 6.8 ± 2.3 days and 6.8 ± 1.8 days, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.963). The percentage of patients with appropriate total DOT was 59.5% and 66.3%, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.337). In the three-group analysis, mean final discharge DOT was 2.9 ± 1.7 days in the accepted group and 4.2 ± 0.9 days in the rejected group (<i>P</i> = 0.030). Mean total DOT was 6.4 ± 1.6 days and 8.1 ± 1.8 days, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.009). The percentage of patients with appropriate total DOT was 82.3% and 11.1%, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> The accepted TOC pharmacist interventions significantly reduced both discharge DOT and total DOT. These findings emphasize the impact TOC pharmacists can have with antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"8971900251345976"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900251345976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 2019 Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Core Elements of Hospital Antibiotic Stewardship identifies community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) as a crucial area for improving antibiotic use. Transitions of care (TOC) pharmacists can optimize medication therapy for CAP patients. Methods: This was a retrospective, multi-hospital analysis of discharge antibiotic prescribing. Between December 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023, TOC pharmacists intervened to decrease discharge days of therapy (DOT) for CAP therapy. The study compared records of CAP patients with a TOC antibiotic stewardship intervention vs those without. An additional three-group analysis compared patients without an intervention to those with an accepted intervention to those with a rejected intervention. Results: 196 patient records were included in the analysis; 80 had a TOC pharmacist intervention and 116 did not. 62 interventions were accepted and 18 were rejected. Mean final discharge DOT was 3.8 ± 1.7 days in the non-intervention group and 3.4 ± 1.6 days in the intervention group (P = 0.231). Mean total DOT was 6.8 ± 2.3 days and 6.8 ± 1.8 days, respectively (P = 0.963). The percentage of patients with appropriate total DOT was 59.5% and 66.3%, respectively (P = 0.337). In the three-group analysis, mean final discharge DOT was 2.9 ± 1.7 days in the accepted group and 4.2 ± 0.9 days in the rejected group (P = 0.030). Mean total DOT was 6.4 ± 1.6 days and 8.1 ± 1.8 days, respectively (P = 0.009). The percentage of patients with appropriate total DOT was 82.3% and 11.1%, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The accepted TOC pharmacist interventions significantly reduced both discharge DOT and total DOT. These findings emphasize the impact TOC pharmacists can have with antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.

前瞻审核及转岗药师反馈对社区获得性肺炎管理的影响。
背景:2019年美国疾病控制与预防中心的《医院抗生素管理核心要素》将社区获得性肺炎(CAP)确定为改善抗生素使用的关键领域。过渡护理(TOC)药师可以优化药物治疗的CAP患者。方法:对多家医院的出院抗生素处方进行回顾性分析。2022年12月1日至2023年6月30日期间,TOC药师干预减少CAP治疗的出院天数(DOT)。该研究比较了接受TOC抗生素管理干预的CAP患者与未接受干预的CAP患者的记录。另一项三组分析比较了未接受干预的患者、接受干预的患者和拒绝干预的患者。结果:196例患者病历被纳入分析;80人有TOC药剂师干预,116人没有。62项干预被接受,18项被拒绝。非干预组平均最终出院DOT为3.8±1.7 d,干预组平均最终出院DOT为3.4±1.6 d (P = 0.231)。平均总DOT分别为6.8±2.3 d和6.8±1.8 d (P = 0.963)。总DOT合适的患者比例分别为59.5%和66.3% (P = 0.337)。三组分析,接受组平均最终出院DOT为2.9±1.7 d,拒绝组平均最终出院DOT为4.2±0.9 d (P = 0.030)。平均总DOT分别为6.4±1.6 d和8.1±1.8 d (P = 0.009)。总DOT合适的患者比例分别为82.3%和11.1% (P < 0.001)。结论:接受TOC药师干预后,出院DOT和总DOT均显著降低。这些发现强调了TOC药剂师可以对抗菌素管理倡议产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信