Interpretable multi-label classification model for predicting post-anesthesia care unit complications: a prospective cohort study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Guoting Ma, Wenjun Yan, Zunqiang Zhao, Yanjia Li, Lingkai Wang
{"title":"Interpretable multi-label classification model for predicting post-anesthesia care unit complications: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Guoting Ma, Wenjun Yan, Zunqiang Zhao, Yanjia Li, Lingkai Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03145-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are potential associations between post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) complications that significantly impact enhanced recovery after surgery. Timely identification of these signs is essential for implementing comprehensive, systematic management strategies and delivering personalized anesthetic care. However, relevant studies are currently limited. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable multi-label classification model to predict PACU complications concurrently.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study enrolled adult patients who underwent general anesthesia and elective surgery and were transferred to the PACU after surgery. The patients were dynamically monitored and evaluated for the occurrence of six common PACU complications: respiratory adverse events, hypothermia, hemodynamic instability, nausea/vomiting, agitation/delirium, and pain. A multi-label classification model was developed on the basis of 16 key features, and a Markov network was embedded to quantify and analyze the association network among these complications. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was applied to conduct interpretability analysis of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 16,838 total patients, 6,830 (40.6%) experienced at least one complication. In the training cohort, 2,125 (57.0%) patients experienced two or more complications at the same time. The AUCs for the six complications in the three cohorts ranged from 0.735 to 0.914, 0.720 to 0.920, and 0.693 to 0.928, respectively. Respiratory adverse events performed best. Age, gender, BMI, duration of anesthesia, and postoperative analgesia emerged as the five most important features. The relative importance of respiratory adverse events to hemodynamic instability was the highest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The integration of a multi-label classification model with interpretable methods has significant advantages in simultaneously predicting PACU complications, identifying the risk factors for specific complications, optimizing postoperative resource allocation, and improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"278"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03145-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are potential associations between post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) complications that significantly impact enhanced recovery after surgery. Timely identification of these signs is essential for implementing comprehensive, systematic management strategies and delivering personalized anesthetic care. However, relevant studies are currently limited. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable multi-label classification model to predict PACU complications concurrently.

Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled adult patients who underwent general anesthesia and elective surgery and were transferred to the PACU after surgery. The patients were dynamically monitored and evaluated for the occurrence of six common PACU complications: respiratory adverse events, hypothermia, hemodynamic instability, nausea/vomiting, agitation/delirium, and pain. A multi-label classification model was developed on the basis of 16 key features, and a Markov network was embedded to quantify and analyze the association network among these complications. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was applied to conduct interpretability analysis of the model.

Results: Of the 16,838 total patients, 6,830 (40.6%) experienced at least one complication. In the training cohort, 2,125 (57.0%) patients experienced two or more complications at the same time. The AUCs for the six complications in the three cohorts ranged from 0.735 to 0.914, 0.720 to 0.920, and 0.693 to 0.928, respectively. Respiratory adverse events performed best. Age, gender, BMI, duration of anesthesia, and postoperative analgesia emerged as the five most important features. The relative importance of respiratory adverse events to hemodynamic instability was the highest.

Conclusion: The integration of a multi-label classification model with interpretable methods has significant advantages in simultaneously predicting PACU complications, identifying the risk factors for specific complications, optimizing postoperative resource allocation, and improving patient outcomes.

预测麻醉后护理病房并发症的可解释多标签分类模型:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:麻醉后护理单位(PACU)并发症之间存在潜在关联,这些并发症显著影响术后恢复。及时识别这些体征对于实施全面、系统的管理策略和提供个性化的麻醉护理至关重要。然而,目前相关的研究还很有限。本研究旨在建立并验证一种可解释的多标签分类模型,以同时预测PACU并发症。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了接受全身麻醉和择期手术并在手术后转入PACU的成年患者。对患者进行动态监测并评估6种常见PACU并发症的发生情况:呼吸不良事件、体温过低、血流动力学不稳定、恶心/呕吐、躁动/谵妄和疼痛。基于16个关键特征建立了多标签分类模型,并嵌入马尔可夫网络来量化和分析这些复杂特征之间的关联网络。采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)方法对模型进行可解释性分析。结果:在16838例患者中,6830例(40.6%)出现了至少一种并发症。在培训队列中,2125例(57.0%)患者同时出现两种或两种以上并发症。3个队列6种并发症的auc分别为0.735 ~ 0.914、0.720 ~ 0.920、0.693 ~ 0.928。呼吸道不良反应表现最好。年龄、性别、体重指数、麻醉时间和术后镇痛是五个最重要的特征。呼吸不良事件对血流动力学不稳定的相对重要性最高。结论:将多标签分类模型与可解释方法相结合,在同时预测PACU并发症、识别特定并发症的危险因素、优化术后资源分配、改善患者预后方面具有显著优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信