Respite Experiences and Needs of Caregivers of Older Adults in Singapore: A Qualitative Study

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Zhiying Lim, Jeannette Jen-Mai Lee
{"title":"Respite Experiences and Needs of Caregivers of Older Adults in Singapore: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Zhiying Lim,&nbsp;Jeannette Jen-Mai Lee","doi":"10.1155/hsc/8847165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>In many countries, the caregiving of older adults often falls on their family members. Family caregivers advocate respite care to mitigate the negative impacts of caregiving. Most related studies have been conducted in Western countries and lack an Asian perspective. Hence, this study explored the perceptions and needs for respite care among family caregivers of older adults in Singapore. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 15 caregivers and 5 social workers. An inductive analysis approach was implemented. The results revealed that caregivers perceived “ideal” respite care as a dyadic and preventive strategy, whereby caregivers would attend to their own needs only when adequate care for their care recipients was assured and when they recognized that they had relegated their own needs. However, there was a disparity between their “ideal” respite and actual respite experiences. The experience of negotiating their “ideal” respite was found to be dependent on their personal resources, and the use of respite services also reflects unmet needs of emergency respite. This study identified personal and systemic factors influencing how caregivers negotiate their “ideal” respite. The study highlights the importance of raising awareness and normalizing the need for respite, as caregivers often prioritize their care recipients’ needs above their own. A dyadic approach must be considered in respite care policy and service delivery, whereby care recipients’ health is stabilized while caregivers are supported to meet their personal needs. Importantly, it is useful to view respite as a social need to address the recurrent issues of availability and affordability in the current biomedical-centric respite care provision.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/8847165","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/8847165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many countries, the caregiving of older adults often falls on their family members. Family caregivers advocate respite care to mitigate the negative impacts of caregiving. Most related studies have been conducted in Western countries and lack an Asian perspective. Hence, this study explored the perceptions and needs for respite care among family caregivers of older adults in Singapore. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 15 caregivers and 5 social workers. An inductive analysis approach was implemented. The results revealed that caregivers perceived “ideal” respite care as a dyadic and preventive strategy, whereby caregivers would attend to their own needs only when adequate care for their care recipients was assured and when they recognized that they had relegated their own needs. However, there was a disparity between their “ideal” respite and actual respite experiences. The experience of negotiating their “ideal” respite was found to be dependent on their personal resources, and the use of respite services also reflects unmet needs of emergency respite. This study identified personal and systemic factors influencing how caregivers negotiate their “ideal” respite. The study highlights the importance of raising awareness and normalizing the need for respite, as caregivers often prioritize their care recipients’ needs above their own. A dyadic approach must be considered in respite care policy and service delivery, whereby care recipients’ health is stabilized while caregivers are supported to meet their personal needs. Importantly, it is useful to view respite as a social need to address the recurrent issues of availability and affordability in the current biomedical-centric respite care provision.

新加坡老年人照顾者的喘息经验与需求:一项质性研究
在许多国家,照顾老年人的责任往往落在他们的家庭成员身上。家庭照护者提倡临时照护,以减轻照护的负面影响。大多数相关研究都是在西方国家进行的,缺乏亚洲视角。因此,本研究探讨了新加坡老年人家庭照顾者对临时护理的看法和需求。对15名护理人员和5名社工进行了半结构化访谈。采用归纳分析方法。结果显示,护理人员认为“理想的”临时护理是一种双重和预防性的策略,只有当他们的护理对象得到充分的护理保证,并且当他们认识到他们已经降低了自己的需求时,护理人员才会照顾自己的需求。然而,他们的“理想”喘息和实际喘息体验之间存在差异。人们发现,他们谈判“理想”喘息的经验取决于他们的个人资源,而喘息服务的使用也反映了紧急喘息的需要未得到满足。本研究确定了影响护理人员如何协商“理想”喘息的个人和系统因素。该研究强调了提高认识和使喘息需求正常化的重要性,因为护理人员经常优先考虑他们的护理对象的需求而不是他们自己的需求。在临时护理政策和服务提供方面必须考虑采取双重办法,即稳定受护理者的健康,同时支持照顾者满足其个人需求。重要的是,将喘息视为一种社会需求,以解决当前以生物医学为中心的喘息护理提供中反复出现的可得性和可负担性问题,这是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信