Control of warfarin treatment in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and falsely high INR at point-of-care-testing

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Jørn Dalsgaard Nielsen , Thomas Steffen Hermann , Konstantinos Dimopoulos , Anne Storgaard Nørskov
{"title":"Control of warfarin treatment in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and falsely high INR at point-of-care-testing","authors":"Jørn Dalsgaard Nielsen ,&nbsp;Thomas Steffen Hermann ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Dimopoulos ,&nbsp;Anne Storgaard Nørskov","doi":"10.1016/j.thromres.2025.109361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The standard of care for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Several studies have indicated that lupus anticoagulant (LA) can interfere with the international normalized ratio (INR) results obtained by point-of-care testing (POCT) devices. A subset of patients with APS has clinically significant systematic differences between POCT INR and plasma INR (P-INR) measured in the hospital laboratory.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to investigate a potential correlation between POCT INR (CoaguChek, Roche Diagnostics) and P-INR in these patients.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In our anticoagulation clinic, we compared 363 paired CoaguChek-INR (CC-INR) with P-INR results using Owren's method from 37 patients with APS receiving self-managed VKA. Each patient had a minimum of three paired measurements of CC-INR and P-INR and a median CC-INR/P-INR ratio &gt; 1.20.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In all patients, we found a strong linear correlation between CC-INR and P-INR (median R<sup>2</sup>: 0.89; IQR: 0.78–0.94). Each patient had their own characteristic regression line from which CC-INR could be converted to P-INR. Thirty-four patients continued with self-managed treatment and the use of a conversion table. However, 3 patients had to switch to INR control in the anticoagulation clinic, as the upper limit of their therapeutic CC-INR interval exceeded the maximum (INR: 8.0) on their CoaguChek device.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In a subset of patients with APS who, during self-managed VKA therapy, had persistently higher POCT INR than P-INR, the majority could continue with self-managed therapy using a conversion table, as the falsely elevated POCT INR values <!--> <!-->were linearly correlated to P-INR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23064,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis research","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 109361"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384825001112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The standard of care for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Several studies have indicated that lupus anticoagulant (LA) can interfere with the international normalized ratio (INR) results obtained by point-of-care testing (POCT) devices. A subset of patients with APS has clinically significant systematic differences between POCT INR and plasma INR (P-INR) measured in the hospital laboratory.

Objectives

We aimed to investigate a potential correlation between POCT INR (CoaguChek, Roche Diagnostics) and P-INR in these patients.

Materials and methods

In our anticoagulation clinic, we compared 363 paired CoaguChek-INR (CC-INR) with P-INR results using Owren's method from 37 patients with APS receiving self-managed VKA. Each patient had a minimum of three paired measurements of CC-INR and P-INR and a median CC-INR/P-INR ratio > 1.20.

Results

In all patients, we found a strong linear correlation between CC-INR and P-INR (median R2: 0.89; IQR: 0.78–0.94). Each patient had their own characteristic regression line from which CC-INR could be converted to P-INR. Thirty-four patients continued with self-managed treatment and the use of a conversion table. However, 3 patients had to switch to INR control in the anticoagulation clinic, as the upper limit of their therapeutic CC-INR interval exceeded the maximum (INR: 8.0) on their CoaguChek device.

Conclusions

In a subset of patients with APS who, during self-managed VKA therapy, had persistently higher POCT INR than P-INR, the majority could continue with self-managed therapy using a conversion table, as the falsely elevated POCT INR values  were linearly correlated to P-INR.
华法林对抗磷脂综合征患者和护理点检测虚高INR患者的治疗控制
血栓性抗磷脂综合征(APS)的标准治疗是使用维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)抗凝治疗。一些研究表明,狼疮抗凝剂(LA)可能会干扰通过即时检测(POCT)装置获得的国际标准化比率(INR)结果。一部分APS患者在POCT INR和医院实验室测量的血浆INR (P-INR)之间存在临床显著的系统性差异。目的:研究这些患者的POCT INR (CoaguChek,罗氏诊断)和P-INR之间的潜在相关性。材料和方法在我们的抗凝临床,我们比较了37例接受自我管理VKA的APS患者的363对CoaguChek-INR (CC-INR)和P-INR结果。每位患者至少有3次CC-INR和P-INR的成对测量,以及CC-INR/P-INR的中位数比值>;1.20.结果在所有患者中,我们发现CC-INR与P-INR之间存在很强的线性相关(中位R2: 0.89;差:0.78 - -0.94)。每个患者都有自己的特征回归线,CC-INR可由此转化为P-INR。34名患者继续自我管理治疗并使用转换表。然而,有3例患者在抗凝临床不得不切换到INR控制,因为他们的治疗CC-INR间隔的上限超过了CoaguChek设备上的最大值(INR: 8.0)。结论在一些APS患者中,在自我管理VKA治疗期间,POCT INR持续高于P-INR,大多数患者可以使用转换表继续自我管理治疗,因为错误升高的POCT INR值与P-INR呈线性相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thrombosis research
Thrombosis research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
364
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Thrombosis Research is an international journal dedicated to the swift dissemination of new information on thrombosis, hemostasis, and vascular biology, aimed at advancing both science and clinical care. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research, reviews, editorials, opinions, and critiques, covering both basic and clinical studies. Priority is given to research that promises novel approaches in the diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, and prevention of thrombotic and hemorrhagic diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信