Clinical efficacy and safety of two highly purified human menopausal gonadotropins in women undergoing in vitro fertilization.

IF 3.4 Q2 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
Reproduction & fertility Pub Date : 2025-06-10 Print Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1530/RAF-24-0132
Kamini A Rao, Geeta Khanna, Himanshu Bavishi, N Sanjeeva Reddy, Kajal Mangukiya, Renu Jain, Kishan Pv
{"title":"Clinical efficacy and safety of two highly purified human menopausal gonadotropins in women undergoing in vitro fertilization.","authors":"Kamini A Rao, Geeta Khanna, Himanshu Bavishi, N Sanjeeva Reddy, Kajal Mangukiya, Renu Jain, Kishan Pv","doi":"10.1530/RAF-24-0132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This study compared the efficacy and safety of two highly purified (HP) human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) preparations, Gynogen HP and Menopur, in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for in vitro fertilization (IVF). A multicenter, randomized, active-controlled noninferiority comparative study was conducted between 2019 and 2021. Women aged 21-40 undergoing COS for their first or second IVF cycle, with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection, were randomized to receive either Gynogen HP or Menopur. The primary endpoint was to determine the total number of oocytes retrieved. Key secondary endpoints included total hMG dose, days of hMG stimulation, fertilization rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and safety. A total of 150 patients were randomized into two groups: 77 received Gynogen HP and 73 received Menopur COS. The primary endpoint, the number of oocytes retrieved (mean ± standard deviation (SD)), was similar between the Gynogen HP (6.3 ± 3.39) and Menopur (6.7 ± 4.52) groups. The least square (LS) mean values were 5.9 for the Gynogen HP and 6.3 for Menopur, with an LS mean difference of - 0.4 (95% CI: -1.83, 1.07; P = 0.6067), indicating that noninferiority as the lower limit of the 95% CI was above the non-inferiority threshold of -2.0. Secondary efficacy endpoints and safety analysis showed no significant differences between groups. Gynogen HP is noninferior and therapeutically equivalent to Menopur in terms of the number of oocytes retrieval, with a comparable safety profile. These results support the use of Gynogen HP for COS in women undergoing IVF as a part of assisted reproduction techniques.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>This study compared two fertility medications (Gynogen HP and Menopur) that are used to help women recruit eggs for IVF treatment. The researchers assessed if these medications are equally potent and safe. The study involved 150 women undergoing their first or second round of IVF between 2019 and 2021. Half of the women received Gynogen HP, while another half received Menopur. The main finding was that both medications worked similarly - women on Gynogen HP recruited an average of 6.3 eggs, while those on Menopur recruited an average of 6.7 eggs. This small difference was not meaningful from a medical perspective. Other important factors, such as pregnancy rates and safety concerns, were also similar between the two medications. Researchers concluded that Gynogen HP works just as well as Menopur for IVF treatment and is equally safe to use. This means doctors can confidently prescribe either medication for women undergoing IVF.</p>","PeriodicalId":101312,"journal":{"name":"Reproduction & fertility","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproduction & fertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/RAF-24-0132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This study compared the efficacy and safety of two highly purified (HP) human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) preparations, Gynogen HP and Menopur, in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for in vitro fertilization (IVF). A multicenter, randomized, active-controlled noninferiority comparative study was conducted between 2019 and 2021. Women aged 21-40 undergoing COS for their first or second IVF cycle, with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection, were randomized to receive either Gynogen HP or Menopur. The primary endpoint was to determine the total number of oocytes retrieved. Key secondary endpoints included total hMG dose, days of hMG stimulation, fertilization rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and safety. A total of 150 patients were randomized into two groups: 77 received Gynogen HP and 73 received Menopur COS. The primary endpoint, the number of oocytes retrieved (mean ± standard deviation (SD)), was similar between the Gynogen HP (6.3 ± 3.39) and Menopur (6.7 ± 4.52) groups. The least square (LS) mean values were 5.9 for the Gynogen HP and 6.3 for Menopur, with an LS mean difference of - 0.4 (95% CI: -1.83, 1.07; P = 0.6067), indicating that noninferiority as the lower limit of the 95% CI was above the non-inferiority threshold of -2.0. Secondary efficacy endpoints and safety analysis showed no significant differences between groups. Gynogen HP is noninferior and therapeutically equivalent to Menopur in terms of the number of oocytes retrieval, with a comparable safety profile. These results support the use of Gynogen HP for COS in women undergoing IVF as a part of assisted reproduction techniques.

Lay summary: This study compared two fertility medications (Gynogen HP and Menopur) that are used to help women recruit eggs for IVF treatment. The researchers assessed if these medications are equally potent and safe. The study involved 150 women undergoing their first or second round of IVF between 2019 and 2021. Half of the women received Gynogen HP, while another half received Menopur. The main finding was that both medications worked similarly - women on Gynogen HP recruited an average of 6.3 eggs, while those on Menopur recruited an average of 6.7 eggs. This small difference was not meaningful from a medical perspective. Other important factors, such as pregnancy rates and safety concerns, were also similar between the two medications. Researchers concluded that Gynogen HP works just as well as Menopur for IVF treatment and is equally safe to use. This means doctors can confidently prescribe either medication for women undergoing IVF.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

两种高纯度人绝经期促性腺激素(Gynogen HP vs. menopause)在体外受精妇女中的临床疗效和安全性。
本研究比较了两种高纯度(HP)人绝经期促性腺激素(hMG)制剂Gynogen HP和menopause在接受体外受精(IVF)控制性卵巢刺激(COS)的女性中的疗效和安全性。在2019年至2021年间进行的一项多中心、随机、主动对照的非劣效性比较研究。年龄在21岁至40岁之间的女性在第一次或第二次试管婴儿周期中接受COS,接受或不接受胞浆内单精子注射,随机接受Gynogen HP或绝经组。主要终点是确定提取的卵母细胞总数。主要次要终点包括hMG总剂量、hMG刺激天数、受精率、着床率、临床妊娠率和安全性。150例患者随机分为两组:77例接受Gynogen HP治疗,73例接受menopause COS治疗。Gynogen HP组(6.3±3.39)和绝经组(6.7±4.52)的主要终点卵母细胞数(平均±SD)相似。最小二乘(LS)均值分别为5.9和6.3,LS均值差为- 0.4 (95% CI: -1.83, 1.07;p = 0.6067);95% CI下限高于非劣效性阈值-2.0,表明非劣效性。次要疗效终点和安全性分析显示两组间无显著差异。Gynogen HP在卵母细胞回收数量方面不逊色,在治疗上与绝经相同,具有相当的安全性。这些结果支持在接受体外受精的妇女中使用Gynogen HP作为辅助生殖技术的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信