The Ticking Clock of Aortic Root Replacement - Single-Center Experience After Urgent and Emergent Aortic Root Replacement Using the BioIntegral and Freestyle™ Bioconduits.

Konstantina Spetsotaki, Jingjing Shi, Ajay Moza, Matthias Menne, Ali Aljalloud
{"title":"The Ticking Clock of Aortic Root Replacement - Single-Center Experience After Urgent and Emergent Aortic Root Replacement Using the BioIntegral and Freestyle™ Bioconduits.","authors":"Konstantina Spetsotaki, Jingjing Shi, Ajay Moza, Matthias Menne, Ali Aljalloud","doi":"10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aortic root pathologies needing full aortic root replacement are challenging entities correlated to high morbidity and mortality due to their complexity and mostly refer to high-risk patients. In this retrospective study, we report our surgical experience and clinical results of patients undergoing a Bentall procedure as primary or reoperative surgery with the application of aortic bioconduits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent full aortic root replacement utilizing either BioIntegral (BI) or Medtronic Freestyle™ (FS) bioconduit in the Cardiothoracic Surgery Department of the University Hospital Aachen RWTH from January 2015 until September 2020, in an urgent or emergency setting, were analyzed and followed up until December 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six patients underwent aortic root replacement with bioconduits (N=11 with BI, N=15 with FS) in our center. Twenty-three cases were of infective cause, and three were of noninfective cause; 30.76% were urgent, and 69.23% were emergency cases. Two (7.70%) patients died during operation due to irreversible aortic root damage. In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were four out 26 (15.4%) patients. The mean follow-up time for all the patients was 52.01 ± 39.41 months. Patients who received a primary aortic root replacement had significantly higher survival than redo cases. BI surgery needed longer cardiopulmonary bypass times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical outcome was equal for both bioconduits. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed for deeper insights into this complex entity.</p>","PeriodicalId":72457,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":"40 3","pages":"e20240307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Aortic root pathologies needing full aortic root replacement are challenging entities correlated to high morbidity and mortality due to their complexity and mostly refer to high-risk patients. In this retrospective study, we report our surgical experience and clinical results of patients undergoing a Bentall procedure as primary or reoperative surgery with the application of aortic bioconduits.

Methods: Patients who underwent full aortic root replacement utilizing either BioIntegral (BI) or Medtronic Freestyle™ (FS) bioconduit in the Cardiothoracic Surgery Department of the University Hospital Aachen RWTH from January 2015 until September 2020, in an urgent or emergency setting, were analyzed and followed up until December 2023.

Results: Twenty-six patients underwent aortic root replacement with bioconduits (N=11 with BI, N=15 with FS) in our center. Twenty-three cases were of infective cause, and three were of noninfective cause; 30.76% were urgent, and 69.23% were emergency cases. Two (7.70%) patients died during operation due to irreversible aortic root damage. In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were four out 26 (15.4%) patients. The mean follow-up time for all the patients was 52.01 ± 39.41 months. Patients who received a primary aortic root replacement had significantly higher survival than redo cases. BI surgery needed longer cardiopulmonary bypass times.

Conclusion: Clinical outcome was equal for both bioconduits. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed for deeper insights into this complex entity.

主动脉根部置换的滴答时钟-使用BioIntegral和Freestyle™bio导管进行紧急和紧急主动脉根部置换后的单中心体验。
导言:主动脉根部病变需要全主动脉根部置换术是具有挑战性的实体,由于其复杂性,与高发病率和死亡率相关,主要涉及高风险患者。在这项回顾性研究中,我们报告了本特尔手术作为首次或再手术应用主动脉生物导管的患者的手术经验和临床结果。方法:分析2015年1月至2020年9月在亚琛工业大学医院胸外科使用BioIntegral (BI)或Medtronic Freestyle™(FS)生物导管进行全主动脉根部置换的患者,并随访至2023年12月。结果:本组26例患者行生物导管主动脉根部置换术(BI组11例,FS组15例)。感染性病例23例,非感染性病例3例;急症占30.76%,急症占69.23%。2例(7.70%)患者术中因主动脉根部不可逆损伤死亡。住院和30天死亡率为4 / 26(15.4%)。所有患者平均随访时间为52.01±39.41个月。接受原发性主动脉根部置换术的患者的生存率明显高于重做的患者。BI手术需要更长的体外循环时间。结论:两种生物导管的临床效果相同。为了更深入地了解这一复杂的实体,需要进行更大规模的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信