Clinical Impact of New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Data from a Single-Center Retrospective Registry.

Aleksey A Baranov, Aram G Badoian, Dmitrii A Khelimskii, Aryuna Yu Tsydenova, Ivan S Peregudov, Vladimir V Beloborodov, Aleksey G Filippenko, Toyche U Khalkhozhaev, Oleg V Krestyaninov
{"title":"Clinical Impact of New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Data from a Single-Center Retrospective Registry.","authors":"Aleksey A Baranov, Aram G Badoian, Dmitrii A Khelimskii, Aryuna Yu Tsydenova, Ivan S Peregudov, Vladimir V Beloborodov, Aleksey G Filippenko, Toyche U Khalkhozhaev, Oleg V Krestyaninov","doi":"10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The clinical significance of new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains controversial. In the presented study, we aimed to assess the impact of new LBBB on clinical outcomes after TAVR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 473 patients underwent TAVR for severe aortic stenosis between 2015 and 2023. According to the exclusion criteria, the study cohort comprised of 322 patients for analysis. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular death, with secondary endpoints including all-cause mortality and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with new LBBB had a significantly smaller indexed aortic valve area (0.3 ± 0.1 vs. 0.4 ± 0.1, P < 0.01) and interventricular membranous septum length (6.2 ± 1.6 vs. 6.9 ± 1.8, P < 0.01). By multivariable analysis, new LBBB remained an independent predictor of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio [HR] 7.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16 - 43.50, P = 0.03) during the 2.9-year follow-up period. There were no significant differences in the incidence of all-cause mortality (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.17 - 1.37, P = 0.16) and PPI (HR 2.61, 95% CI 0.85 - 0.80, P = 0.08) between patients with new LBBB compared to those without it.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>New LBBB after TAVR procedure is associated with an increased risk of death from cardiovascular causes, but it did not increase the risk of all-cause mortality and PPI over the long-term period.</p>","PeriodicalId":72457,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":"40 3","pages":"e20240187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124747/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The clinical significance of new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains controversial. In the presented study, we aimed to assess the impact of new LBBB on clinical outcomes after TAVR.

Methods: A total of 473 patients underwent TAVR for severe aortic stenosis between 2015 and 2023. According to the exclusion criteria, the study cohort comprised of 322 patients for analysis. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular death, with secondary endpoints including all-cause mortality and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) during follow-up.

Results: Patients with new LBBB had a significantly smaller indexed aortic valve area (0.3 ± 0.1 vs. 0.4 ± 0.1, P < 0.01) and interventricular membranous septum length (6.2 ± 1.6 vs. 6.9 ± 1.8, P < 0.01). By multivariable analysis, new LBBB remained an independent predictor of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio [HR] 7.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16 - 43.50, P = 0.03) during the 2.9-year follow-up period. There were no significant differences in the incidence of all-cause mortality (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.17 - 1.37, P = 0.16) and PPI (HR 2.61, 95% CI 0.85 - 0.80, P = 0.08) between patients with new LBBB compared to those without it.

Conclusion: New LBBB after TAVR procedure is associated with an increased risk of death from cardiovascular causes, but it did not increase the risk of all-cause mortality and PPI over the long-term period.

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发左束支传导阻滞的临床影响:来自单中心回顾性登记的数据。
导论:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后新发左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)的临床意义仍有争议。在本研究中,我们旨在评估新的LBBB对TAVR后临床结果的影响。方法:2015 - 2023年共473例重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者行TAVR。根据排除标准,研究队列纳入322例患者进行分析。主要终点是心血管死亡,次要终点包括随访期间的全因死亡率和永久性起搏器植入(PPI)。结果:新发LBBB患者主动脉瓣指数面积(0.3±0.1∶0.4±0.1,P < 0.01)和室间隔膜长度(6.2±1.6∶6.9±1.8,P < 0.01)均明显减小。通过多变量分析,在2.9年的随访期间,新发LBBB仍然是心血管死亡的独立预测因子(危险比[HR] 7.09, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.16 - 43.50, P = 0.03)。新发LBBB患者的全因死亡率(HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.17 - 1.37, P = 0.16)和PPI (HR 2.61, 95% CI 0.85 - 0.80, P = 0.08)与无新发LBBB患者相比无显著差异。结论:TAVR术后新发LBBB与心血管原因死亡风险增加有关,但在长期内没有增加全因死亡率和PPI的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信