Medicare Eligibility and Health Care Use Among Adults With Psychological Distress.

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sungchul Park, Katherine A Koh, Michael Liu, Rishi K Wadhera
{"title":"Medicare Eligibility and Health Care Use Among Adults With Psychological Distress.","authors":"Sungchul Park, Katherine A Koh, Michael Liu, Rishi K Wadhera","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Although Medicare provides nearly universal health insurance coverage for individuals aged 65 years or older, clinicians and policymakers have expressed concern about access to and coverage of mental health services in the program. It is unclear how transitioning to Medicare affects adults with psychological distress, who may be particularly vulnerable to changes in mental health services.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the association of Medicare eligibility with use of mental health care, general health care, and acute care services among adults with psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this cross-sectional study using the 2009-2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and a regression discontinuity design, health care use among adults aged 59 to 64 years and those aged 66 to 71 years with psychological distress, defined as those who scored 3 or higher on the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire or 13 or higher on the 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, was evaluated. Data were analyzed from March 2023 to February 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Medicare eligibility at age 65 years.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>Mental health care use, including outpatient mental heath visits and psychotropic medication fills, general health care use, and acute care use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population included 3970 adults with psychological distress (mean [SD] age, 64.0 [3.6] years; 59.7% [n = 2370] female). Medicare eligibility at age 65 years was associated with a decrease in outpatient mental health visits with any health care professional (adjusted change of -3.4 percentage points [95% CI, -5.4 to -1.4 percentage points]), no change in mental health visits with psychiatrists (-0.7 percentage points [95% CI, -4.1 to 2.6 percentage points]), and a decrease in psychotropic medication fills (-5.3 percentage points [95% CI, -10.3 to -0.3 percentage points]) among adults with psychological distress. There was no change in general health care use, including all outpatient visits (0.6 percentage points [95% CI, -5.4 to 6.5 percentage points]) and prescription drug use (0.1 percentage points [95% CI, -2.2 to 2.5 percentage points]). In contrast, Medicare eligibility was associated with increases in acute care use, such as inpatient admissions (5.5 percentage points [95% CI, 2.2-8.9 percentage points]) and emergency department visits (8.1 percentage points [95% CI, 3.3-13.0 percentage points]) among adults with psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>These findings suggest that Medicare eligibility at age 65 years was associated with decreased use of mental health outpatient services and increased acute care use among adults with psychological distress. These findings highlight the need for policies that address gaps in mental health care in the Medicare program.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 5","pages":"e251089"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Although Medicare provides nearly universal health insurance coverage for individuals aged 65 years or older, clinicians and policymakers have expressed concern about access to and coverage of mental health services in the program. It is unclear how transitioning to Medicare affects adults with psychological distress, who may be particularly vulnerable to changes in mental health services.

Objectives: To examine the association of Medicare eligibility with use of mental health care, general health care, and acute care services among adults with psychological distress.

Design, setting, and participants: In this cross-sectional study using the 2009-2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and a regression discontinuity design, health care use among adults aged 59 to 64 years and those aged 66 to 71 years with psychological distress, defined as those who scored 3 or higher on the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire or 13 or higher on the 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, was evaluated. Data were analyzed from March 2023 to February 2025.

Exposures: Medicare eligibility at age 65 years.

Main outcomes: Mental health care use, including outpatient mental heath visits and psychotropic medication fills, general health care use, and acute care use.

Results: The study population included 3970 adults with psychological distress (mean [SD] age, 64.0 [3.6] years; 59.7% [n = 2370] female). Medicare eligibility at age 65 years was associated with a decrease in outpatient mental health visits with any health care professional (adjusted change of -3.4 percentage points [95% CI, -5.4 to -1.4 percentage points]), no change in mental health visits with psychiatrists (-0.7 percentage points [95% CI, -4.1 to 2.6 percentage points]), and a decrease in psychotropic medication fills (-5.3 percentage points [95% CI, -10.3 to -0.3 percentage points]) among adults with psychological distress. There was no change in general health care use, including all outpatient visits (0.6 percentage points [95% CI, -5.4 to 6.5 percentage points]) and prescription drug use (0.1 percentage points [95% CI, -2.2 to 2.5 percentage points]). In contrast, Medicare eligibility was associated with increases in acute care use, such as inpatient admissions (5.5 percentage points [95% CI, 2.2-8.9 percentage points]) and emergency department visits (8.1 percentage points [95% CI, 3.3-13.0 percentage points]) among adults with psychological distress.

Conclusions and relevance: These findings suggest that Medicare eligibility at age 65 years was associated with decreased use of mental health outpatient services and increased acute care use among adults with psychological distress. These findings highlight the need for policies that address gaps in mental health care in the Medicare program.

有心理困扰的成年人的医疗保险资格和医疗保健使用。
重要性:尽管医疗保险为65岁或以上的个人提供了几乎普遍的健康保险,但临床医生和政策制定者对该计划中心理健康服务的获取和覆盖表示担忧。目前尚不清楚向医疗保险过渡对有心理困扰的成年人有何影响,他们可能特别容易受到心理健康服务变化的影响。目的:研究有心理困扰的成年人中,医疗保险资格与使用精神卫生保健、一般卫生保健和急症护理服务的关系。设计、环境和参与者:在这项使用2009-2019年医疗支出小组调查和回归不连续设计的横断面研究中,评估了59至64岁和66至71岁有心理困扰的成年人的医疗保健使用情况,定义为在2项患者健康问卷中得分为3分或更高,在6项凯斯勒心理困扰量表中得分为13分或更高。数据分析时间为2023年3月至2025年2月。暴露:65岁的医疗保险资格。主要结局:精神卫生保健使用,包括门诊精神卫生访问和精神药物填充,一般卫生保健使用和急性护理使用。结果:研究人群包括3970名有心理困扰的成年人(平均[SD]年龄64.0[3.6]岁;59.7% [n = 2370]女性)。65岁的医疗保险资格与任何医疗保健专业人员的门诊精神健康就诊减少(调整后变化为-3.4个百分点[95% CI, -5.4至-1.4个百分点]),与精神科医生的精神健康就诊没有变化(-0.7个百分点[95% CI, -4.1至2.6个百分点]),以及心理困扰的成年人的精神药物填充减少(-5.3个百分点[95% CI, -10.3至-0.3个百分点])有关。一般医疗保健使用没有变化,包括所有门诊就诊(0.6个百分点[95% CI, -5.4至6.5个百分点])和处方药使用(0.1个百分点[95% CI, -2.2至2.5个百分点])。相比之下,医疗保险资格与急性护理使用的增加有关,例如在有心理困扰的成年人中住院(5.5个百分点[95% CI, 2.2-8.9个百分点])和急诊就诊(8.1个百分点[95% CI, 3.3-13.0个百分点])。结论和相关性:这些研究结果表明,65岁的医疗保险资格与心理困扰的成年人减少使用心理健康门诊服务和增加使用急性护理有关。这些发现强调了需要制定政策来解决医疗保险计划中精神卫生保健方面的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信