Current evidence for robotic and laparoscopic liver resections: Results from the international study group.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Hwee-Leong Tan, Darren W Q Chua, Brian K P Goh
{"title":"Current evidence for robotic and laparoscopic liver resections: Results from the international study group.","authors":"Hwee-Leong Tan, Darren W Q Chua, Brian K P Goh","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2025.102238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Minimally-invasive liver resection (MILR) has been increasingly adopted across the world with improvements in surgical technique and instrumentation. While MILR has been shown to confer several perioperative benefits compared to open liver resection, the steep learning curve associated with MILR remains a significant hurdle. Robotic liver resection (RLR) leverages on inherent technical advantages the robotic platform has over conventional laparoscopy, holding the potential for RLR to achieve the perioperative advantages of MILR while overcoming the limitations of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). In this review, we summarize the current evidence comparing the outcomes of RLR and LLR from the International Robotic and Laparoscopic Liver Resection Study Group.</p>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":" ","pages":"102238"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2025.102238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Minimally-invasive liver resection (MILR) has been increasingly adopted across the world with improvements in surgical technique and instrumentation. While MILR has been shown to confer several perioperative benefits compared to open liver resection, the steep learning curve associated with MILR remains a significant hurdle. Robotic liver resection (RLR) leverages on inherent technical advantages the robotic platform has over conventional laparoscopy, holding the potential for RLR to achieve the perioperative advantages of MILR while overcoming the limitations of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). In this review, we summarize the current evidence comparing the outcomes of RLR and LLR from the International Robotic and Laparoscopic Liver Resection Study Group.

目前机器人和腹腔镜肝切除术的证据:来自国际研究小组的结果。
随着手术技术和器械的改进,微创肝切除术(MILR)在世界范围内越来越多地被采用。虽然与开放肝切除术相比,MILR已被证明具有一些围手术期的益处,但MILR相关的陡峭学习曲线仍然是一个重大障碍。机器人肝切除术(Robotic liver resection, RLR)利用机器人平台相对于传统腹腔镜固有的技术优势,在克服腹腔镜肝切除术局限性的同时,具有实现MILR围手术期优势的潜力。在这篇综述中,我们总结了目前比较国际机器人和腹腔镜肝脏切除术研究小组RLR和LLR结果的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Oncology-Oxford
Surgical Oncology-Oxford 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
169
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信