Upfront blood microRNA test in LDCT-reluctant individuals: insights from the biomild trial.

IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Gabriella Sozzi, Federica Sabia, Luigi Rolli, Miriam Segale, Paola Suatoni, Anna Zanghi, Margherita Ruggirello, Alfonso Marchianò, Mattia Boeri, Ugo Pastorino
{"title":"Upfront blood microRNA test in LDCT-reluctant individuals: insights from the biomild trial.","authors":"Gabriella Sozzi, Federica Sabia, Luigi Rolli, Miriam Segale, Paola Suatoni, Anna Zanghi, Margherita Ruggirello, Alfonso Marchianò, Mattia Boeri, Ugo Pastorino","doi":"10.1186/s13046-025-03424-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening can reduce mortality in high-risk individuals, but many individuals with a heavy smoking history may be reluctant to undergo radiologic examinations. A non-invasive blood test might help overcome this barrier. The BioMILD trial evaluated the combination of a plasma microRNA signature classifier (MSC) and LDCT for personalized lung cancer screening in 4,119 individuals who smoke or used to smoke. Based on BioMILD results, we aim to conduct a projection analysis to estimate the number of early lung cancers that could be detected if MSC were used as an initial screening tool for individuals reluctant to undergo LDCT. This model explores the potential of a biomarker-driven approach to address screening hesitation.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>The analysis focuses on 3,139 volunteers meeting NLST criteria. At baseline, 24.9% tested MSC-positive. Over two years, 63 lung cancer cases were detected, with a significantly higher incidence among MSC-positive participants (4.1% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.001). A biomarker-driven approach, where only MSC-positive individuals undergo annual LDCT, was compared to standard LDCT screening for all participants. This strategy could identify 58.7% of lung cancers detected via standard screening, including 56.5% of early-stage cases. Raw cost analysis estimated a per-case lung cancer detection cost of ~€14,000 for the biomarker-driven strategy versus ~€12,000 for standard screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upfront blood MSC test showed a reasonable sensitivity for lung cancer detection, including in early-stage disease, with affordable costs. Such a non-invasive blood test strategy might contribute to improve lung cancer screening endorsement in the high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"44 1","pages":"168"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-025-03424-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening can reduce mortality in high-risk individuals, but many individuals with a heavy smoking history may be reluctant to undergo radiologic examinations. A non-invasive blood test might help overcome this barrier. The BioMILD trial evaluated the combination of a plasma microRNA signature classifier (MSC) and LDCT for personalized lung cancer screening in 4,119 individuals who smoke or used to smoke. Based on BioMILD results, we aim to conduct a projection analysis to estimate the number of early lung cancers that could be detected if MSC were used as an initial screening tool for individuals reluctant to undergo LDCT. This model explores the potential of a biomarker-driven approach to address screening hesitation.

Main body: The analysis focuses on 3,139 volunteers meeting NLST criteria. At baseline, 24.9% tested MSC-positive. Over two years, 63 lung cancer cases were detected, with a significantly higher incidence among MSC-positive participants (4.1% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.001). A biomarker-driven approach, where only MSC-positive individuals undergo annual LDCT, was compared to standard LDCT screening for all participants. This strategy could identify 58.7% of lung cancers detected via standard screening, including 56.5% of early-stage cases. Raw cost analysis estimated a per-case lung cancer detection cost of ~€14,000 for the biomarker-driven strategy versus ~€12,000 for standard screening.

Conclusion: Upfront blood MSC test showed a reasonable sensitivity for lung cancer detection, including in early-stage disease, with affordable costs. Such a non-invasive blood test strategy might contribute to improve lung cancer screening endorsement in the high-risk population.

不愿接受ldct的个体的前期血液microRNA检测:来自biomild试验的见解。
背景:低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)肺癌筛查可以降低高危人群的死亡率,但许多有大量吸烟史的人可能不愿接受放射检查。一项非侵入性血液检查可能有助于克服这一障碍。BioMILD试验评估了血浆microRNA特征分类器(MSC)和LDCT在4119名吸烟或曾经吸烟的个体中进行个性化肺癌筛查的组合。基于BioMILD的结果,我们的目标是进行预测分析,以估计如果MSC被用作不愿接受LDCT的个体的初始筛查工具,可以检测到的早期肺癌的数量。该模型探索了生物标志物驱动方法解决筛选犹豫的潜力。主体:分析集中于3139名符合NLST标准的志愿者。在基线时,24.9%的人检测出msc阳性。在两年多的时间里,共检测出63例肺癌病例,其中MSC阳性参与者的发病率明显更高(4.1%比1.1%,p)。结论:前期血液MSC检测对肺癌检测具有合理的敏感性,包括在早期疾病中,且费用可承受。这种非侵入性血液检测策略可能有助于提高高危人群肺癌筛查的认可度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
1.80%
发文量
333
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research is an esteemed peer-reviewed publication that focuses on cancer research, encompassing everything from fundamental discoveries to practical applications. We welcome submissions that showcase groundbreaking advancements in the field of cancer research, especially those that bridge the gap between laboratory findings and clinical implementation. Our goal is to foster a deeper understanding of cancer, improve prevention and detection strategies, facilitate accurate diagnosis, and enhance treatment options. We are particularly interested in manuscripts that shed light on the mechanisms behind the development and progression of cancer, including metastasis. Additionally, we encourage submissions that explore molecular alterations or biomarkers that can help predict the efficacy of different treatments or identify drug resistance. Translational research related to targeted therapies, personalized medicine, tumor immunotherapy, and innovative approaches applicable to clinical investigations are also of great interest to us. We provide a platform for the dissemination of large-scale molecular characterizations of human tumors and encourage researchers to share their insights, discoveries, and methodologies with the wider scientific community. By publishing high-quality research articles, reviews, and commentaries, the Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research strives to contribute to the continuous improvement of cancer care and make a meaningful impact on patients' lives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信