Gabriella Sozzi, Federica Sabia, Luigi Rolli, Miriam Segale, Paola Suatoni, Anna Zanghi, Margherita Ruggirello, Alfonso Marchianò, Mattia Boeri, Ugo Pastorino
{"title":"Upfront blood microRNA test in LDCT-reluctant individuals: insights from the biomild trial.","authors":"Gabriella Sozzi, Federica Sabia, Luigi Rolli, Miriam Segale, Paola Suatoni, Anna Zanghi, Margherita Ruggirello, Alfonso Marchianò, Mattia Boeri, Ugo Pastorino","doi":"10.1186/s13046-025-03424-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening can reduce mortality in high-risk individuals, but many individuals with a heavy smoking history may be reluctant to undergo radiologic examinations. A non-invasive blood test might help overcome this barrier. The BioMILD trial evaluated the combination of a plasma microRNA signature classifier (MSC) and LDCT for personalized lung cancer screening in 4,119 individuals who smoke or used to smoke. Based on BioMILD results, we aim to conduct a projection analysis to estimate the number of early lung cancers that could be detected if MSC were used as an initial screening tool for individuals reluctant to undergo LDCT. This model explores the potential of a biomarker-driven approach to address screening hesitation.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>The analysis focuses on 3,139 volunteers meeting NLST criteria. At baseline, 24.9% tested MSC-positive. Over two years, 63 lung cancer cases were detected, with a significantly higher incidence among MSC-positive participants (4.1% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.001). A biomarker-driven approach, where only MSC-positive individuals undergo annual LDCT, was compared to standard LDCT screening for all participants. This strategy could identify 58.7% of lung cancers detected via standard screening, including 56.5% of early-stage cases. Raw cost analysis estimated a per-case lung cancer detection cost of ~€14,000 for the biomarker-driven strategy versus ~€12,000 for standard screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upfront blood MSC test showed a reasonable sensitivity for lung cancer detection, including in early-stage disease, with affordable costs. Such a non-invasive blood test strategy might contribute to improve lung cancer screening endorsement in the high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"44 1","pages":"168"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-025-03424-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening can reduce mortality in high-risk individuals, but many individuals with a heavy smoking history may be reluctant to undergo radiologic examinations. A non-invasive blood test might help overcome this barrier. The BioMILD trial evaluated the combination of a plasma microRNA signature classifier (MSC) and LDCT for personalized lung cancer screening in 4,119 individuals who smoke or used to smoke. Based on BioMILD results, we aim to conduct a projection analysis to estimate the number of early lung cancers that could be detected if MSC were used as an initial screening tool for individuals reluctant to undergo LDCT. This model explores the potential of a biomarker-driven approach to address screening hesitation.
Main body: The analysis focuses on 3,139 volunteers meeting NLST criteria. At baseline, 24.9% tested MSC-positive. Over two years, 63 lung cancer cases were detected, with a significantly higher incidence among MSC-positive participants (4.1% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.001). A biomarker-driven approach, where only MSC-positive individuals undergo annual LDCT, was compared to standard LDCT screening for all participants. This strategy could identify 58.7% of lung cancers detected via standard screening, including 56.5% of early-stage cases. Raw cost analysis estimated a per-case lung cancer detection cost of ~€14,000 for the biomarker-driven strategy versus ~€12,000 for standard screening.
Conclusion: Upfront blood MSC test showed a reasonable sensitivity for lung cancer detection, including in early-stage disease, with affordable costs. Such a non-invasive blood test strategy might contribute to improve lung cancer screening endorsement in the high-risk population.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research is an esteemed peer-reviewed publication that focuses on cancer research, encompassing everything from fundamental discoveries to practical applications.
We welcome submissions that showcase groundbreaking advancements in the field of cancer research, especially those that bridge the gap between laboratory findings and clinical implementation. Our goal is to foster a deeper understanding of cancer, improve prevention and detection strategies, facilitate accurate diagnosis, and enhance treatment options.
We are particularly interested in manuscripts that shed light on the mechanisms behind the development and progression of cancer, including metastasis. Additionally, we encourage submissions that explore molecular alterations or biomarkers that can help predict the efficacy of different treatments or identify drug resistance. Translational research related to targeted therapies, personalized medicine, tumor immunotherapy, and innovative approaches applicable to clinical investigations are also of great interest to us.
We provide a platform for the dissemination of large-scale molecular characterizations of human tumors and encourage researchers to share their insights, discoveries, and methodologies with the wider scientific community.
By publishing high-quality research articles, reviews, and commentaries, the Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research strives to contribute to the continuous improvement of cancer care and make a meaningful impact on patients' lives.