Artificial Intelligence for Assessment of Digital Mammography Positioning Reveals Persistent Challenges.

IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Laurie R Margolies, Georgia G Spear, Jennifer I Payne, Sian E Iles, Mohamed Abdolell
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence for Assessment of Digital Mammography Positioning Reveals Persistent Challenges.","authors":"Laurie R Margolies, Georgia G Spear, Jennifer I Payne, Sian E Iles, Mohamed Abdolell","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mammographic breast cancer detection depends on high-quality positioning, which is traditionally assessed and monitored subjectively. This study used artificial intelligence (AI) to evaluate mammography positioning on digital screening mammograms to identify and quantify unmet mammography positioning quality (MPQ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected within an IRB-approved collaboration. In total, 126 367 digital mammography studies (553 339 images) were processed. Unmet MPQ criteria, including exaggeration, portion cutoff, posterior tissue missing, nipple not in profile, too high on image receptor, inadequate pectoralis length, sagging, and posterior nipple line (PNL) length difference, were evaluated using MPQ AI algorithms. The similarity of unmet MPQ occurrence and rank order was compared for each health system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 163 759 and 219 785 unmet MPQ criteria were identified, respectively, at the health systems. The rank order and the probability distribution of the unmet MPQ criteria were not statistically significantly different between health systems (P = .844 and P = .92, respectively). The 3 most-common unmet MPQ criteria were: short PNL length on the craniocaudal (CC) view, inadequate pectoralis muscle, and excessive exaggeration on the CC view. The percentages of unmet positioning criteria out of the total potential unmet positioning criteria at health system 1 and health system 2 were 8.4% (163 759/1 949 922) and 7.3% (219 785/3 030 129), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Artificial intelligence identified a similar distribution of unmet MPQ criteria in 2 health systems' daily work. Knowledge of current commonly unmet MPQ criteria can facilitate the improvement of mammography quality through tailored education strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaf025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Mammographic breast cancer detection depends on high-quality positioning, which is traditionally assessed and monitored subjectively. This study used artificial intelligence (AI) to evaluate mammography positioning on digital screening mammograms to identify and quantify unmet mammography positioning quality (MPQ).

Methods: Data were collected within an IRB-approved collaboration. In total, 126 367 digital mammography studies (553 339 images) were processed. Unmet MPQ criteria, including exaggeration, portion cutoff, posterior tissue missing, nipple not in profile, too high on image receptor, inadequate pectoralis length, sagging, and posterior nipple line (PNL) length difference, were evaluated using MPQ AI algorithms. The similarity of unmet MPQ occurrence and rank order was compared for each health system.

Results: Altogether, 163 759 and 219 785 unmet MPQ criteria were identified, respectively, at the health systems. The rank order and the probability distribution of the unmet MPQ criteria were not statistically significantly different between health systems (P = .844 and P = .92, respectively). The 3 most-common unmet MPQ criteria were: short PNL length on the craniocaudal (CC) view, inadequate pectoralis muscle, and excessive exaggeration on the CC view. The percentages of unmet positioning criteria out of the total potential unmet positioning criteria at health system 1 and health system 2 were 8.4% (163 759/1 949 922) and 7.3% (219 785/3 030 129), respectively.

Conclusion: Artificial intelligence identified a similar distribution of unmet MPQ criteria in 2 health systems' daily work. Knowledge of current commonly unmet MPQ criteria can facilitate the improvement of mammography quality through tailored education strategies.

用于评估数字乳房x线摄影定位的人工智能揭示了持续的挑战。
目的:乳房x线摄影检测乳腺癌依赖于高质量的定位,传统上是主观评估和监测。本研究利用人工智能(AI)评估数字筛查乳房x线照片的乳房x线定位,以识别和量化未满足的乳房x线定位质量(MPQ)。方法:数据是在irb批准的合作中收集的。总共处理了126 367份数字乳房x线摄影研究(553 339张图像)。未满足MPQ标准,包括夸张、部分截断、后部组织缺失、乳头不轮廓、图像受体过高、胸肌长度不足、下垂和后乳头线(PNL)长度差异,使用MPQ AI算法进行评估。比较各卫生系统未满足MPQ发生率和等级顺序的相似性。结果:在卫生系统中,共有163 759人和219 785人分别被确定为不符合MPQ标准。未满足MPQ标准的排序顺序和概率分布在不同卫生系统间差异无统计学意义(P =。844和P =。92年,分别)。3个最常见的未满足MPQ标准是:颅侧(CC)视图上PNL长度短,胸肌不足,CC视图上过度夸张。卫生系统1和卫生系统2未达到潜在定位标准的比例分别为8.4%(163 759/1 949 922)和7.3%(219 785/3 030 129)。结论:人工智能在两个卫生系统的日常工作中发现了类似的未满足MPQ标准的分布。了解目前普遍未达到的MPQ标准可以通过量身定制的教育策略促进乳房x光检查质量的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
81
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信